Nick Wallis Profile picture
Apr 11, 2024 36 tweets 7 min read Read on X
At the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry, watching David Smith, former Post Office MD (2010) give evidence. Image
You can watch along live here:
I have limited capacity to type, so I'll jus screenshot and post up interesting documents. David Smith commissioned the infamous Ismay report:

postofficescandal.uk/post/rod-ismay…
This is David Smith's Witness Statement:

postofficehorizoninquiry.org.uk/evidence/witn0…
Some interesting pars...

19....in around June or July 2010, I remember that some questions were raised regarding Horizon, in light of a parliamentary question from Ms Patel
(Member of Parliament) and a Channel 4 news report which was looking into the losses that SPMs...
... were experiencing. I believe that the Board were asked by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills ("BIS") (now known as the Department for Business and Trade) to pull together answers to these
questions and conversations were subsequently held...
20.1 cannot recall precisely what happened next but I can remember that we asked for confirmation as to why we were being told that the system was
robust. This resulted in a report being written which I understand has beennamed 'the Ismay Report' by the Inquiry...
... had the report given any sense that there was a
problem, we would have done a deeper dive into the system. However, it was unequivocal in telling us that the system was robust and providing reasons
as to why.
Smith, in oral evidence, has admitted there was no written brief for Ismay's report and is being both unequivocal that he would have wanted to know from Ismay about any problems with Horizon, whilst also admitting they were involved in an assurance exercise...
This was his written response to Priti Patel MP, after being instructed by the then PO minister Ed Davey to respond to concerns about the Horizon system: Image
A few days later, this email came from the Shareholder Executive (now UKGI) a govt body: Image
So Smith sends this email a day after replying to Priti Patel: Image
Asked why he blithely told Priti Patel everything was fine and the next day started asking questions, he says the email from ShEx got him thinking.
His email of questions continues: Image
Here's how it finishes: Image
Says it was about "trying to stress test what people were telling me so that I've got confidence and so that ShEx have confidence in our position"
The PO's response to C4: Image
The Ismay report was commissioned almost immediately afterwards. Smith said he told Ismay the board wants an "honest view" and "not one-sided". He then contradicts this by saying "I was asking him to give me the rationale as to why the business...
... thought we were comfortable and confident in the assertions we were making."
This Ismay's evidence: Image
Smith says its not true. He is taken to an email sent on his behalf by his PA which contradicts him: Image
Smith says the Inquiry might be "splitting hairs here".
Inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams intervenes to say he's "struggling" with parts of Smith's evidence.
After to some to-ing or fro-ing, Chair points out that Smith intended Ismay to draw together conclusions that "had already been arrived at". Smith agrees
On receiving the Ismay report, Smith says in his WS: Image
Counsel to the Inquiry asks how he came to the conclusion no investigation was needed. Smith says they took the assurances from Fujitsu and Seema Misra's case was a "test" of the Horizon system, which it had passed.
Says he didn't review the Misra case in detail. Counsel to the inquiry brings up Smith's email to his team after Seema was sent to prison: Image
Smith apologises to Seema Misra and tells the inquiry he was just congratulating his team.

Counsel to the inquiry finishes, and Flora Page, Seema's barrister asks the Chair before asking her questions that he read Smith the self-incrimination warning. Chair asks why...
Page replies "We say that the Ismay report was a cover-up."

Chair complies. The self-incrimination warning gives witnessses the opportunity to request to not answer a question if they think it might help convict them in a criminal trial.
Page says that when Smith commissioned the Ismay report he and his senior leadership team knew "that Horizon's integrity was very much in doubt and that you wanted to cover it up."

Smith replies: "No. Absolutely not."
Page brings up the top level meeting in Sep 2010 which shows there was discussion about a serious bug in Horizon and remote access by Fujitsu, the Friday before the Misra trial began. This was not disclosed to the Misra team. "What sort of culture were you presiding over?" asks..
... Page. Smith says he was not aware of it at the time. He says he is "shocked and frankly appalled if that was the sequence of events"
Page asks if he knew that Ismay was told about "back doors" to Horizon after writing his report and did nothing about it. Smith says he. was unaware. Page calls up this email: Image
And says the Misra trial was being used to justify the Post Office's confidence in Horizon. Smith disagrees.
Smith's evidence ends.
@threadreaderapp unroll pls

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Wallis

Nick Wallis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickwallis

Sep 17
This is a Bill which should stiffen the resolve of everyone in public life to find out the truth and tell it, though I accept it might cause internal lawyers and officials to try to keep important information from their CEOs and comms teams.

pressgazette.co.uk/news/bill-coul…
I wonder if it will lead to more people whistleblowing - ie those from within an organisation who know the truth will seek to contradict whatever lie or version of the truth is being peddled in public, in order to ensure they are not charged with a criminal offence when the...
... truth comes out. Whistleblowing protections are still not great if you are a franchisee or contractor.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 5
Morning. On the way back to Westminster Magistrates Court for day two of Graham Linehan’s trial for harassment and damaging a phone. Here is ⁦@Glinner⁩ at the end of yesterday’s hearing. Image
... he really is - he's almost like a cipher - a twitter avatar floating around. I wanted the Met to be aware of him. Also I reported a credible death threat from FW and nothing was done about it and every time I do go to the police about these guys - nothing is done about it
DC the first time you used the word sociopath about SB was on 13 Oct when you tweet about him, FW and a link to the twtter spaces discussion
GL the "you will pay" one
DC - yes - why call him a sociopath
GL I'm told he sent pizzas to his victims at 4am
Read 101 tweets
Sep 4
I am at Westminster Magistrates court sitting directly across the courtroom from Graham Linehan who is sitting in the dock, about to stand trial for harassment and damaging a camera. That is @sharrond62 in the photo who has arrived to support @Glinner Image
... taking photos outside of the attendees
SB and the buildings
SV why the attendees
SB there may have potentially been someone famous
SV did you make a statement with a view to starting civil proceedings against L
SB yes after I made a statement to the police
[a statement is handed round]
SV is this your civil statement
SB yes
SV dated 14 Nov
SB yes
SV anything else that day
SB ?
SV remember being told by police the criminal matter was being dropped
SB no
Read 100 tweets
Dec 17, 2024
Hello and welcome to a busy and likely final hearing day (Day 200) of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. Earlier BBC Breakfast created an impromptu studio to allow Nina Warhurst to interview Janet Skinner, Lee Castleton, St John and Tim Brentnall Image
The Post Office barrister Nicola Greaney KC is on her feet. She gave a cursory overview of the Post Office's failings throughout the scandal. Sample quotes:
"This inquiry has been a humbling experience not only for those that gave evidence but for those that currently work at Post Office or used to and who are all equally appalled by Post Office's failures. No one who has read and listened to the evidence during this inquiry could come to any conclusion other than that the Horizon IT scandal is the most widespread miscarriage of justice in British legal history and that its roots lay in fundamental structural and governance failings."
And: "Post Office acknowledges that the inquiry will rightly be critical of a number of individuals, not only from Post Office. It invites the inquiry to bear in mind the serious governance and structural failures that permitted their actions to be unchecked, resulting in failings to the detriment of Postmasters. Post Office raises this not to excuse but to explain the context in which those failures occurred."
Read 84 tweets
Dec 16, 2024
Good morning and welcome to the penultimate day of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. Sir Wyn Williams is in the Chair. He begins by recording the death of Mrs Margaret Boston - a former Subpostmaster in Brex in Rotherham in South Yorkshire. She died on 2 November. She was a core participant in the Inquiry.Image
"Incompetence", "wilful blindness" and "inertia" are key components of this scandal. Board was not effective. Are board effectiveness reviews the best way to see if boards are operating effectively?
There was failure of oversight -UKGI and govt more generally needs to learn from this.
TM goes to redress, restorative justice (RJ) and restoring trust. Ministers say they want full and fair compensation. It not been prompt and in many cases it has not been either full or fair.
Read 98 tweets
Nov 11, 2024
JR takes him to the following article: Image
[sorry that was JB]
JB: what's your take on this
JR: I'll listen to anything Alan Bates says
JB have you done any blue sky thinking on this
JR: we have sped things up, it hasn't reduced the accuracy or fairness or reduced the evidential bar.
JR: we've sped up to due more capacity and we're all keen to get it done in DBT

[JB wants to take him to the PO Horizon Offences Act which came in just before the election]

JB: what was your involvement in this
JR: large cohort of people affected - they could either...
Read 101 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(