Dan Rosenheck Profile picture
Apr 11 • 17 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
🧵on a few interesting nuggets from our story this week on lessons from our 50K YouGov polling sample (): (1/x)economist.com/united-states/…
1. As you move up in age, white voters move right—except for the baby boomers, who are more Dem than either Gen X (younger) or Silent (older). Young white women are Trumpier than young white men?! Black voters move left at higher ages, & their gender gap shrinks. 2/x Image
This supports recent work by @jburnmurdoch on race () & @nate_cohn on age (). I haven't seen anything on young whites’ reverse gender gap: we have Biden up 59-41 2-way w/ white women 18-24 (n=569) & 65-35 w/ white men 18-24 (583). 3/xft.com/content/a76076…
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
We all talk about race, but the best single predictor of voting intention in our survey is religion. (Most voters are white, and race doesn't tell you anything about white voters’ preferences.) For white, Hispanic, and Asian voters, the more important u say religion is to u 4/x Image
the likelier you are to back Trump—regardless of religious affiliation. But controlling for race & religious imptnce, affiliation still has a yuge impact: Trump gets like 30% of white religion-somewhat-impt Jews, but 75% of white religion-somewhat-impt born-again Christians. 5/x
Only among black voters does religious importance fail to predict Trump support, which makes sense given the political history of majority-black churches. Apologies for the ugly ggplot here. 6/x Image
Prob the most striking finding was that the 2nd-best predictor of being a Biden 2020/Trump 2024 swing voter (after being young) was being a non-white parent of a child under 18. V big effect size on a solid sample (2K weighted non-white parents, ~200 Biden-Trump flippers). 7/n Image
I don’t think this has to do with culture wars over wokeness in curricula, b/c only 3% of Biden-Trump swing voters listed education as their top issue. My operating hypothesis is that it’s a consequence of lockdowns and school closures, but would love to see a thorough study 8/n
There’s also a fun bit on the complex relationship between income and vote choice. If you just plot them by themselves, it looks like Trump does best among middle-income voters. 9/n Image
But lower-income voters are disproportionately non-white, and non-whites are disproportionately Democratic. Looking just at white voters, it’s flat from $0-$50K and then declines...10/n Image
but this too is a statistical artifact, b/c the highest-income white voters are also the most likely to be educated, which is tied to voting Dem. If we break it down by race AND education, the old party system of Dems representing labor and Reps capital reveals itself 11/n
Apologies for another ghastly ggplot, but you can see that within race-education groups, the highest-income voters are the Trumpiest, and that having a union member in the household increases Dem vote share by ~10 % pts. Similar effect to adding one tier of education 12/n Image
Here's a cleaner/more legible version in Economist style, though it only shows the pattern among white voters. 13/n Image
Using this giant dataset, we fit a LASSO logistic regression to predict 2-party vote intention. It now lives at an interactive (), where u can plug in any combo of 8 demographic variables & see estimated Trump/Biden probabilities for both 2020 & 2024 14/neconomist.com/us-voter
Unfortunately cell-phone screen-size limits meant we could only use 8 of the 18 variables in our full model, but it's still like ~73% accurate in the test set. Here’s my #BuildAnAmericanVoter profile—please plug in yours and share! 15/n Image
Of possible interest: @NateSilver538 @gelliottmorris @lxeagle17 @leedrutman @Redistrict @loganr2wh @RyanDEnos @johnmsides @rnishimura @smfrogers @bradwascher @GalenMetzger1 @electionclark @ElectProject @vavreck @amandacox @sahilchinoy @admcrlson @CharlieCookDC @lennybronner 16/17
cc @cwarshaw @nathanlgonzales @LarrySabato @b_schaffner @BrendanNyhan @KevinQ @jon_m_rob @kkondik @SeanTrende @Edsall @RonBrownstein @databyler @dhopkins1776 @PatrickRuffini @DrewLinzer @NormOrnstein @benwallacewells @sissenberg @badler @ForecasterEnten 17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Rosenheck

Dan Rosenheck Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanRosenheck

Nov 3, 2020
After a few technical hiccups this morning, @TheEconomist's US Congressional forecasts have been finalized. Dems are >99% to hold the House, with an avg of 244 seats, and 80% to flip the Senate, with an avg of 52.2 seats. projects.economist.com/us-2020-foreca… 1/n
There HAS been tightening: our mean Dem Senate seat total fell by 0.3 in the final 2 days. Much of this has been final polls reverting towards fundamentals: Dem chances in KS fell from a hi of 37% down to 17%; in SC from a hi of 41% to 31%; in ME from a hi of 78% down to 69% 2/n
This suggests that we may have over-weighted Sept/early Oct polls relative to fundamentals. But that's one for 2022. The Dems have a clear path to a bare 50-seat majority thru CO/AZ/NC/ME, tho the scant recent public polling in ME has shown Collins closing the gap. 3/n
Read 7 tweets
Jul 27, 2020
This is a helpful reminder. George W. Bush was also up by 10-11 pts on Gore in August before going on to lose the popular vote. However, in my view, the VERY big diff b/w 2020 and these prior cycles is fundamentals. Both 1988 and 2000 featured parties with popular 2-term 1/n
incumbents running for a very difficult 3rd straight term amid a pretty-good economy. In my fundamentals model, that yields an expectation of a very close race (in the end, not a very good prediction for 1988). The basic patterns political scientists have identified 2 explain 2/n
why people wind up voting the way they do yielded a very different conclusion than the polls did. So there was very good reason to doubt that those polling leads would hold up. By contrast, in 2020, the fundamentals suggest that an unpopular incumbent seeking reelection amid 3/n
Read 15 tweets
Apr 10, 2020
THREAD re the "everybody's-got-it" school of covid truthery, which my story this wk in @TheEconomist economist.com/graphic-detail…, based on study by @inschool4life & @Alex_Washburne, supports. Most impt pt is that these results do NOT mean we should end/loosen lockdowns now/soon. 1/n
By now, every1 following this knows that only a minority of people w/ covid-19 are getting tested, & that a substantial share have mild or totally asymptomatic cases. The official case-fatality rate (CFR), which is deaths divided by CONFIRMED cases, of 6% is obv way too high. 2/n
To estimate infection-fatality rate (IFR), which is deaths divided by total infections, have 2 estimate number of undiagnosed cases. Evidence is dribbling in that it's v hi. A review: 1. Entire pop of Italian town of Vò was tested by Mar 6. 3% infected independent.co.uk/news/world/eur… 3/n
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(