1) WHO's leading vaccine official testified in court that she advised against #COVID passports & was ignored.
COVID vaccines didn't stop transmission; passports gave a false sense of security.
2) Dr. Hanna Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization.
3) Dr. Nohynek testified that Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission. The EU implemented passports around this time.
4) The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Dr. Nohynek advised Finland to cease passports in late 2021 but was ignored.
5) Dr. Nohynek cannot be ignored. Besides chairing WHO's SAGE, she is one of Finland’s top vaccine advisors and serves on the boards of Vaccines Togetherand the International Vaccine Institute.
6) Her court testimony was first reported yesterday by @IkeNovikoff
7) Courtroom drama continued today with testimony from @DrAseemMalhotra who will state that some authorities and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.
8) Read the story and @DrAseemMalhotra testimony at @DisInfoChron and please subscribe! pauldthacker.com/blog/#/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) @FullFact even tried to bolster confidence in Pfizer’s #COVID vaccine by pointing out that—while Pfizer paid an unprecedented $2.3 billion fine for healthcare fraud—everyone needs to calm the fuck down, none of Pfizer’s fraud involved a vaccine.
3) The regulator found that Pfizer began spreading vaccine misinformation in 2020 to promote their COVID vaccine, meaning Pfizer was misleading the public about their vaccine throughout the pandemic.
1) Allison Neitzel served as physician-expert on misinformation stories at NBC, Mother Jones, MedPage Today, & others, but was forced to apologise last week for spreading misinformation and defaming physicians.
2) In one incident, @AliNeitzelMD attacked physician @TracyBethHoeg as "Hoeg hag."
HOEG: “The fact [Neitzel] has not nearly completed her training but has appointed herself as an expert physician in pointing out misinformation strikes me as both odd and ironic.”
3) Here's a posting of Allison Neitzel's "Sorry if you were hurt" apology, where she explained spreading misinformation about multiple physicians.
1) A US Attorney's Office and the FBI are now monitoring public universities' release of #FOIA documents on sensitive science. What is going on?
The documents involve "disinformation researcher" Kate Starbird of UW & virologist Ralph Baric of UNC. pauldthacker.com/blog/#/
2) The Justice Department's involvement became public though a state FOI.
An AUSA emailed Kate Starbird about reviewing release of public documents. Starbird is a "disinformation researcher" at UW.
3) “[W]e would ask to have an extension of time before the records are produced so that we can have time to review them and assess whether we’ll have to file suit to protect them from disclosure.”
cc: @davelevinthal
@JimLaPorta
@gregorykorte
2) Cohen's awkward “most researchers say” article is classic science writing. What science writers label “reporting’ is just calling up the known experts and then quoting them as experts.
Science writers report for, not on science. #sciomm
3) Day after Cohen's "most researchers say" article appeared, Kristian Andersen sent this email to Anthony Fauci.
“[S]ome of the features (potentially) look engineered .... Eddie Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.
1) Four years ago this week, published Taylor & Francis published a commentary claiming it was a “conspiracy theory” to speculate if COVID started in a Wuhan lab.
2) The purported authors of the commentary are:
Shan-Lu Liu, Ohio State University
Linda J. Saif, Ohio State University
Susan R. Weiss, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Lishan Su, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3) But ghostwriters included Ralph Baric at UNC and Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
1) Florida has a Grand Jury looking into the pandemic response, interviewing and assessing evidence, and hearing from scientists.
They released initial findings. Guess what?
Not much evidence for "masks work" propaganda you've been hearing from "follow the science" experts.
2) Some KEY POINTS: The CDC has not put out quality science on masks through their journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). pauldthacker.com/blog/#/
3) ANOTHER KEY FINDING: False assurances that “masks work” may have harmed high-risk individuals who were misled into believing masks offer more protection than they do.