🧵1/ Thread on the Islamophobic and antisemitic disinformation about the #SydneyAttack . I downloaded X posts that wrongly stated that the attacker, Joel Cauchi, was either a Muslim or Jewish terrorist
2/ The size of the network was at least 140,000 posts (from X). This time series graph shows that initially, most of the disinformation (red bars) accused the attacker of being a Muslim or Islamist. At about 1700 UTC we see more and more disinfo about the attacker
3/ being Jewish (orange bars). This temporal analysis reflects the fact that there is a notable tendency when it comes to such attacks in Western countries to accuse, without evidence, the perpetrator of being Muslim. To accuse the attacker of being Jewish is less common
4/ This time series graph highlights a number of the accounts who got the most engagement on their disinformation, including @goldingbf @SaffronSunanda @visegrad24 @Klaus_Arminius @mattwallace888 and @xavierjp__ . These six accounts alone got more than 10 million views
5/ Often the same accounts come up when it comes to hate speech. @Visegrad24 , which gets a lot of engagement, is definitely one of these accounts. Accounts like @Mattwallace888 , who boosted the 'cohen' rumour also have huge reach, with over 1.7 million followers
6/ I think particularly problematic is that two British journalists/media personalities @JuliaHB1 and @RachelRileyRRR both connected the attack to Islam. As people who work in media, they should, in theory, know better.
7/ The origin of the false accusation against Ben Cohen (which relied on the not-so-subtle premise that Cohen is a Jewish name) is less clear. One of the earliest mentions on X was this obscure account - which hasn't tweeted much. Smells like an influence op.
8/ Some of the other most shared posts implicating Cohen can be considered 'pro-Russian' - like @stairwayto3dom - certainly anti-Ukrainian. Others claiming he was a Zionist include the well known 'Russian bot' (as the Guardian termed her) Maram Susli
9/ Another problematic aspect of the Cohen disinformation is that Australia's Channel 7 news actually seemed to pick up these X rumors, and in a promo, falsely named the attacker as 'Benjamin Cohen'. (They are going to issue an apology later according to the Brisbane Times).
10/ So it's pretty clear what happened here. There was a tragic attack in Sydney. The familiar accusations that the perpetrator was Muslim circulated initially. The war in Gaza also prompted some to instrumentalise it to make propaganda points - eg Rachel Riley's 'global
11/ intifada' comment. Similarly, there were attempts to claim the attacker was a pro-Israel Zionist by accounts who famously are pro-Assad and pro Russia - such as Maram Susli. This was likely a reflexive accusation designed to diffuse the inevitable political cost
12/ this would have had on the pro-Palestinian movement. As Riley's tweet shows, it was already being used to mobilise criticism of pro-Palestinian protesters. As is common with disinformation, political actors will exploit an event to mobilise narratives that better fit their
13/ broader narratives. Ultimately, and sadly, this narrative of 'the attacker is either a Muslim or a Jew' reflects the politicization of the Gaza war along pro West versus pro Russia lines, and does nothing more than aggravate polarization. But that's the point I guess.
13/ But this is how digital disinformation works - it's a combination of bad faith posts, misinformation/sloppy journalism, prejudice, global geopolitcs and polarization. Anyway, given the dangers of such rhetoric, I hope at least
14/ that journalists and influencers who aren't simply disinfluencers do some soul-searching to explore why they jumped to such conclusions . #disinformation
15. * note on methods. I downloaded all tweets mentioning sydney + keywords including *zionist* *jewish* *muslim* *islamist* using @nodexl . This yielded over 1780 unique tweets (excluding RTs). I used GPT to quickly code their stance (i.e. who they were accusing of being behind the stabbing), and manually cross checked 50 for accuracy. I ran a network analysis and some either time series analysis to rank influencers.
16. Errata - tweet 6 should be @RachelRileyRR - not Rachel Riley with three Rs. Thanks @richardjbellamy for spotting this.
17: update: By including *Bondi+ Cohen* in the search results, it's quite clear that one of the most influential early spreaders of the disinfo that the attacker was Benjamin Cohen was @aussiecossack - Simeon Boikov - described as a 'pro-putin' influencer holed up in the Russian consulate
This feels disingenous. The way disinfo works is for people to seed rumors online, so that they get picked up by people and amplified by influencers or media outlets- even if unconfirmed. It is based on the simple premise that if enough people say something, it becomes a narrative. If you don't know this you're a liar or naive, and definitely shouldn't call yourself a journalist in 2024
Update: @JuliaHB1 and @RachelRileyRR apologise for their tweets implicating Muslims and Islam in the Sydney attacks. They're quite problematic apologies that don't seem to reflect on the implications of why they jumped to conclusions, but apologies are something. I imagine this will be the end of it. Islamophobia doesn't seem to be much of a priority in the UK
ABC have done a great timeline - features some of my analysis
1/ THREAD: On populist gaslighting and the war on truth-tellers 🧵
2/ Something concerning is happening in our information ecosystem: populists aren't just spreading misinfo, they're systematically trying to undermine the very concept of verifiable truth
3/ When fact-checkers or experts present evidence contradicting false claims, they get labeled as "elitist manipulators" or 'censors' - effectively inverting reality
🧵 THREAD: Meta's disturbing new "free speech" announcement is a masterclass in how platforms enable digital harm under the guise of freedom 1/9 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Meta announces it's getting rid of factcheckers & "restrictions" on gender/immigration content. This isn't about free speech - it's about platforming hate & disinformation under the guise of "mainstream discourse" 2/9
Key red flags: ❗️❗️❗️
Moving content teams to Texas "for less bias" (read: political motivation)
Replacing factcheckers with "community notes"
Framing basic content moderation as "censorship" 3/9
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.