🧵1/ Thread on the Islamophobic and antisemitic disinformation about the #SydneyAttack . I downloaded X posts that wrongly stated that the attacker, Joel Cauchi, was either a Muslim or Jewish terrorist
2/ The size of the network was at least 140,000 posts (from X). This time series graph shows that initially, most of the disinformation (red bars) accused the attacker of being a Muslim or Islamist. At about 1700 UTC we see more and more disinfo about the attacker
3/ being Jewish (orange bars). This temporal analysis reflects the fact that there is a notable tendency when it comes to such attacks in Western countries to accuse, without evidence, the perpetrator of being Muslim. To accuse the attacker of being Jewish is less common
4/ This time series graph highlights a number of the accounts who got the most engagement on their disinformation, including @goldingbf @SaffronSunanda @visegrad24 @Klaus_Arminius @mattwallace888 and @xavierjp__ . These six accounts alone got more than 10 million views
5/ Often the same accounts come up when it comes to hate speech. @Visegrad24 , which gets a lot of engagement, is definitely one of these accounts. Accounts like @Mattwallace888 , who boosted the 'cohen' rumour also have huge reach, with over 1.7 million followers
6/ I think particularly problematic is that two British journalists/media personalities @JuliaHB1 and @RachelRileyRRR both connected the attack to Islam. As people who work in media, they should, in theory, know better.
7/ The origin of the false accusation against Ben Cohen (which relied on the not-so-subtle premise that Cohen is a Jewish name) is less clear. One of the earliest mentions on X was this obscure account - which hasn't tweeted much. Smells like an influence op.
8/ Some of the other most shared posts implicating Cohen can be considered 'pro-Russian' - like @stairwayto3dom - certainly anti-Ukrainian. Others claiming he was a Zionist include the well known 'Russian bot' (as the Guardian termed her) Maram Susli
9/ Another problematic aspect of the Cohen disinformation is that Australia's Channel 7 news actually seemed to pick up these X rumors, and in a promo, falsely named the attacker as 'Benjamin Cohen'. (They are going to issue an apology later according to the Brisbane Times).
10/ So it's pretty clear what happened here. There was a tragic attack in Sydney. The familiar accusations that the perpetrator was Muslim circulated initially. The war in Gaza also prompted some to instrumentalise it to make propaganda points - eg Rachel Riley's 'global
11/ intifada' comment. Similarly, there were attempts to claim the attacker was a pro-Israel Zionist by accounts who famously are pro-Assad and pro Russia - such as Maram Susli. This was likely a reflexive accusation designed to diffuse the inevitable political cost
12/ this would have had on the pro-Palestinian movement. As Riley's tweet shows, it was already being used to mobilise criticism of pro-Palestinian protesters. As is common with disinformation, political actors will exploit an event to mobilise narratives that better fit their
13/ broader narratives. Ultimately, and sadly, this narrative of 'the attacker is either a Muslim or a Jew' reflects the politicization of the Gaza war along pro West versus pro Russia lines, and does nothing more than aggravate polarization. But that's the point I guess.
13/ But this is how digital disinformation works - it's a combination of bad faith posts, misinformation/sloppy journalism, prejudice, global geopolitcs and polarization. Anyway, given the dangers of such rhetoric, I hope at least
14/ that journalists and influencers who aren't simply disinfluencers do some soul-searching to explore why they jumped to such conclusions . #disinformation
15. * note on methods. I downloaded all tweets mentioning sydney + keywords including *zionist* *jewish* *muslim* *islamist* using @nodexl . This yielded over 1780 unique tweets (excluding RTs). I used GPT to quickly code their stance (i.e. who they were accusing of being behind the stabbing), and manually cross checked 50 for accuracy. I ran a network analysis and some either time series analysis to rank influencers.
16. Errata - tweet 6 should be @RachelRileyRR - not Rachel Riley with three Rs. Thanks @richardjbellamy for spotting this.
17: update: By including *Bondi+ Cohen* in the search results, it's quite clear that one of the most influential early spreaders of the disinfo that the attacker was Benjamin Cohen was @aussiecossack - Simeon Boikov - described as a 'pro-putin' influencer holed up in the Russian consulate
This feels disingenous. The way disinfo works is for people to seed rumors online, so that they get picked up by people and amplified by influencers or media outlets- even if unconfirmed. It is based on the simple premise that if enough people say something, it becomes a narrative. If you don't know this you're a liar or naive, and definitely shouldn't call yourself a journalist in 2024
Update: @JuliaHB1 and @RachelRileyRR apologise for their tweets implicating Muslims and Islam in the Sydney attacks. They're quite problematic apologies that don't seem to reflect on the implications of why they jumped to conclusions, but apologies are something. I imagine this will be the end of it. Islamophobia doesn't seem to be much of a priority in the UK
ABC have done a great timeline - features some of my analysis
🧵1/ Just want to point out a few disturbing elements regarding misinformation in this article - "What's I've Heard From Gaza" published in the @TheAtlantic . I will focus on two specific references that are quite crucial in framing a broader argument about Hamas's actions #Gaza
2/ The article asserts with no equivocation that Hamas killed fleeing civilians on the Al Rashid coastal road in Nov 23. Not only is there no evidence for this, but the link is to an article in the Jerusalem Post, that relies on a tweet from known disinfluencer, @amjadt25
3/ Even if one wasn't to take an Occam's razor approach (i.e. it was probably the IDF since they have killed > 33000 people), then it would make sense to at least report this ambiguously. Reuters, for example, covered the strike, but did not even mention it could have been Hamas
🧵It is increasingly clear that ISGAP are operating in a capacity that has nothing to do with antisemitism, but rather malicious disinformation and a war on education. Their latest report is akin to saying ppl in Qatar shouldn't study *anything*, anywhere, lest they nuke us all
2) The highlight is perhaps how they use the third party aggregate edurank to "prove" that @tamuq and @QatarUniversity have "nuclear engineering programs". I don't even think a first year uni student would be this stupid. Neither uni has a nuclear engineering program, but I love
3) the idea that somehow the cunning foxes at Edurank managed to be party to this information that has been hidden from the public. The "report" then documents research projects at TAMUQ that could be "dual use". Below are some favourites. I kid you not, studying "sensors" is
🧵Although there is more pressure on right-wing and pro-Israel lobbies, most of the reporting on Texas A&M's recent decision to close its Qatar campus in four years cites a report by ISGAP - a pro -Israel think tank, which launched a disinformation campaign about nuclear secrets
It goes back to this press release on 4th Jan 2024, when ISGAP claimed absurdly that Qatar could exert control over nuclear weapons research. Make no mistake, it's a disinformation campaign. It is also evident that the only people who took it 'seriously' were right wing
think tank, or Israeli media - e.g. @i24NEWS_EN @Jerusalem_Post . The fact some of these articles were written by FDD-affiliated 'journalists' (& by that I mean people with a record of harassing people who aren't pro-Israel) simply highlights the fact they are not credible
🧵🚨Discovered hundreds of sock puppets promoting Israeli propaganda on X, Threads, FB & Insta. It also includes 'fake' websites. Recently, it has been spreading anti-UNRWA #disinformation, & trying to undermine solidarity between Palestinians & Black people. #Gaza
Analysis 👉
2/ A few people noticed that influential accounts writing about Gaza were getting replies with people linking a @WSJ article about an Israeli 'intelligence' report claiming 10% of UNRWA staff have links to Hamas. One of the authors of the WSJ was a former IDF soldier.
3/ You may have noticed that the wording of the tweets was very similar. All of them focused on the '10%' figure. All of them uncritically embraced the 10% figure of UNRWA employees being 'linked' to Hamas.
🧵1/ Analysis of why Israel's UNRWA 'dossier' smearing UNRWA is misleading propaganda.
Indeed, Israel's own statistics actually show that the alleged Hamas presence in UNRWA is significantly LOWER than elsewhere in #Gaza.
Read on for more >
2/ A number of outlets, including Reuters, Sky News, CNN and Forbes (to name but a few) have run stories about an intelligence dossier provided by Israel (solid source!) attempting to smear UNRWA. @EylonALevy even called UNRWA a 'front' for Hamas'
3/ First the claims.
Claim one: 190 UNRWA employees in Gaza are 'hardened militants'. The WSJ reported that the dossier noted that 23% of UNRWA male employees had ties to Hamas (whatever that means), a higher percentage than 15% for adult males in Gaza.
Google "ICJ HEARING" and "Israel" you'll see the Israeli government have paid Google for another ad putting their propaganda at the top of the search engine. They've done this numerous times, including when Amnesty International called Israel an Apartheid State
If you click on the link there's even a section called "Independent Digital Resources". Of course they're not independent, and they're still pushing disinfo like the beheaded babies