SagasofBharat Profile picture
Apr 14, 2024 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Do you know?

Unlike popularly believed by many RW Hindus that amby was anti-Islam, Amby not only wanted to convert to Islam rejecting Buddhism he was also a partner in crime with Jinnah against Hindus.

THREAD 🧵 SOME LESSER KNOWN FACTS ABOUT AMBEDKAR ON HIS BIRTHDAY. Image
Amby in His “Bahiskrit Bharat” exhorted his community under the bold heading “If you have to convert, become Musalman”.

He asked his community to convert to islam after rejecting the futility of becoming Buddhist and arya samajist. Image
Veer Savarkar, in his kesari clearly wrote “Amby didn’t do us any favor by not converting to Islam or Christianity” just like what many RW Hindus think today.

Savarkar mentions how Amby used to sing the sweetness of Islam and considered it the best religion. Image
Amby insisted that he was drawn to Buddhist philosophy from childhood after reading a book Buddha vichara.

Savarkar ji had called out Amby’s bluff on Buddhism & asked an apt question- if amby was so fond of Buddhism from his childhood how did he ask his followers to embrace islam or Christianity which considered Buddha as Infidel & heathen?

Thus proving him as a liar.Image
According to Savarkar ji, It wasnt like Amby didn’t convert to Buddhism instead of islam or Christianity just because he had some love for Hindus. He was a Dharma Bhrast as per Savarkar ji.

It was simply because he couldn’t manage to do it or else he would. Image
Do you What was the consequence of Ambedkar’s love for Islam?

Many Mahars (ambys community) did convert to Islam by hearing speeches of Ambedkar.

This is witnessed by A chambhar leader, P.N Rajbhoj who accused Amby of misdirecting his followers in Bombay chronicle. Image
When the entire country was protesting against British for the independence of Bharat, Ambedkar had fully supported British going against the congress government.

Here’s my previous thread on the details of his open support to British and opposing Indian Independence.
Anyway, finally congress formed its government & was fighting against British for independence.

In 1939 when British government wasn’t giving any proper direction regarding independence, congress resigned in protest.
Of course Md. Ali Jinnah was celebrating it as deliverance day for the resignation of congress.
Guess who else was celebrating with Jinnah being his partner in crime?

Our so called greatest Freedom fighter Amby ji. Image
At one point even some sections of Muslims were found to be opposing “Deliverance Day” So the anti-Hindu protest ended up being a partner-in-crime protest by only Jinnah & Amby. Image
The only reason Amby didn’t convert to Islam and chose Buddhism, as per Savarkar, was only for personal ambition - if he could amass a huge number of neo Buddhists, he could establish an independent Buddhist state which wasnt possible by converting to islam. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SagasofBharat

SagasofBharat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SagasofBharat

Mar 23
Title: Can Hindus eat Beef
Then proves Hindus are non-vegetarians.

Bro Non-veg ≠ beef

Hindus are against Cow slaughter from Vedic times (SS 1)
to Mohandas Gandhi (SS 2).
Father of nation cancel now?

Punishment for cow slaughter has always been brutal in India [THREAD] Image
Image
This is what Ibn Battuta wrote:

"Killing or eating a cow was strictly forbidden; anyone caught doing it were punished with death in this country"

That has always been the stance of Hindus from Vedic times. Image
Rajput Maharana Kumbha:

"When reports reached this brave Rajput king that Mohammedans were keeling cows in Nagor, He started with 50,000 horsemen to attack Nagor putting 1000s of Mohamedans to sword." Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
Dear illiterate,

Mughals invested everything they had?

Their own autobiography says they had nothing to invest. But came to Hindustan to loot.

Thread 👇🏼- Dismantling both the myth:

1. Mughals invested everything they had
2. "Rajput-blood" made Mughals, Indian Image
Image
-Babur himself says in his autobiography he was in great poverty, so he slaughtered Hindus to take their lands.

-Shahjahan didn't commission Taj Mahal with money from his own pocket.
He charged exorbitant taxes from peasants & selling their women & children as slaves. Image
Image
Image
Image
Jahangir's mother was a Rajput who after marriage became Mariam-uz-zamani.

But Rajput blood didn't stop him from putting Sikh Guru Arjun to death after confiscating his property & as well as his children.

His crime:
Following his faith other than Islam and putting Tilak on his son Khusrau.Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17
Wrong!

India’s GDP:
Before Mughals -33%
After Mughal loot- 24-16%

Mughal court physician, Bernier exposes your lies. He records a steady drain of India’s gold and silver under Mughal rule.

THREAD on how much each Mughal sent India’s wealth to other Islamic nations. 👇🏼 Image
Image
Image
1. BABUR used to distribute the wealth looted from Bharat to every tribe of Afghan, Hazara, arab, Biluch etc.

Valuables were sent to Samarkand, khurasan, kashaghar & Iraq.

Source: Babur’s own Autobiography Babur Nama.

Huge amounts of almost 3-4 lakhs were being sent to Kabul Image
Image
Image
2. Akbar opened his purse wide for Mohamedans to go to hajj. Every year he used to send gifts & huge funds during hajj from the treasury of Bharat.

Source: Humayun Nama

In 1576, Mughal Hajj Caravan to Mecca carried enormous donation of 600,000 rupees. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 27
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”

Did you know?

There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.

The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.

This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.

Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.Image
Image
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.

ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed. Image
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”

Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 17
As we are talking about Nalanda,
Attaching below all my previous posts where i categorically dismantled the lies peddled by Ruchika Sharma on Nalanda.

I am blocked by her. So feel free to use my posts wherever she lies. 👇🏼 Image
Image
Confession from eye-witness account clearly mentioning the religion that destroyed Nalanda.

Read 8 tweets
Jan 7
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves

Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.

Fact:
1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.

2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.

3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.

4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.

5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.

6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.Image
Image
Image
Image
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities

Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.

Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall

Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.Image
Image
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.

Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.

William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(