Unlike popularly believed by many RW Hindus that amby was anti-Islam, Amby not only wanted to convert to Islam rejecting Buddhism he was also a partner in crime with Jinnah against Hindus.
THREAD 🧵 SOME LESSER KNOWN FACTS ABOUT AMBEDKAR ON HIS BIRTHDAY.
Amby in His “Bahiskrit Bharat” exhorted his community under the bold heading “If you have to convert, become Musalman”.
He asked his community to convert to islam after rejecting the futility of becoming Buddhist and arya samajist.
Veer Savarkar, in his kesari clearly wrote “Amby didn’t do us any favor by not converting to Islam or Christianity” just like what many RW Hindus think today.
Savarkar mentions how Amby used to sing the sweetness of Islam and considered it the best religion.
Amby insisted that he was drawn to Buddhist philosophy from childhood after reading a book Buddha vichara.
Savarkar ji had called out Amby’s bluff on Buddhism & asked an apt question- if amby was so fond of Buddhism from his childhood how did he ask his followers to embrace islam or Christianity which considered Buddha as Infidel & heathen?
Thus proving him as a liar.
According to Savarkar ji, It wasnt like Amby didn’t convert to Buddhism instead of islam or Christianity just because he had some love for Hindus. He was a Dharma Bhrast as per Savarkar ji.
It was simply because he couldn’t manage to do it or else he would.
Do you What was the consequence of Ambedkar’s love for Islam?
Many Mahars (ambys community) did convert to Islam by hearing speeches of Ambedkar.
This is witnessed by A chambhar leader, P.N Rajbhoj who accused Amby of misdirecting his followers in Bombay chronicle.
When the entire country was protesting against British for the independence of Bharat, Ambedkar had fully supported British going against the congress government.
Here’s my previous thread on the details of his open support to British and opposing Indian Independence.
Anyway, finally congress formed its government & was fighting against British for independence.
In 1939 when British government wasn’t giving any proper direction regarding independence, congress resigned in protest.
Of course Md. Ali Jinnah was celebrating it as deliverance day for the resignation of congress.
Guess who else was celebrating with Jinnah being his partner in crime?
Our so called greatest Freedom fighter Amby ji.
At one point even some sections of Muslims were found to be opposing “Deliverance Day” So the anti-Hindu protest ended up being a partner-in-crime protest by only Jinnah & Amby.
The only reason Amby didn’t convert to Islam and chose Buddhism, as per Savarkar, was only for personal ambition - if he could amass a huge number of neo Buddhists, he could establish an independent Buddhist state which wasnt possible by converting to islam.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Columbus invading America wasn't an act of bravery He risked himself for greed.
The Capitulations of Santa Fe was a contract between Catholic Monarch & Columbus which promised him 10% share of everything he captures in his conquest.
Colonialism & savagery is getting repackaged here as some huge favour.
The truth is it was the colonialists who were savages and the lands they invaded were highly developed civilizations that had already built government, roads, farms, roads etc.
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.
Do you know what this shrine is famed for?
A hair- Prophet's hair
If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair.
Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas
That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.
So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs"
In 1963, this hair went missing from the dargah & what followed was a riot all over Kashmir & a horror show for Hindus even in Bangladesh.
If you are shocked at the vandalism of Ashoka emblem, imagine the scene when thousands of Mussalmans poured onto the streets of Kashmir to show their anger at the disappearance of a hair.
And we Hindus are sitting silently at the vandalism of 1000s of our temples fighting court cases.
Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.
It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.
If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.
Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.
Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.
But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man.
Akbar was a known sexual predator with an insatiable
sexual appetite. He used to send eunuchs to hunt for fresh women into the household of his own nobles & pick up their daughters at his whims. Women had no choice & were treated as mere pawns.
Imagine calling yourself a feminist after defending such a man.