Unlike popularly believed by many RW Hindus that amby was anti-Islam, Amby not only wanted to convert to Islam rejecting Buddhism he was also a partner in crime with Jinnah against Hindus.
THREAD 🧵 SOME LESSER KNOWN FACTS ABOUT AMBEDKAR ON HIS BIRTHDAY.
Amby in His “Bahiskrit Bharat” exhorted his community under the bold heading “If you have to convert, become Musalman”.
He asked his community to convert to islam after rejecting the futility of becoming Buddhist and arya samajist.
Veer Savarkar, in his kesari clearly wrote “Amby didn’t do us any favor by not converting to Islam or Christianity” just like what many RW Hindus think today.
Savarkar mentions how Amby used to sing the sweetness of Islam and considered it the best religion.
Amby insisted that he was drawn to Buddhist philosophy from childhood after reading a book Buddha vichara.
Savarkar ji had called out Amby’s bluff on Buddhism & asked an apt question- if amby was so fond of Buddhism from his childhood how did he ask his followers to embrace islam or Christianity which considered Buddha as Infidel & heathen?
Thus proving him as a liar.
According to Savarkar ji, It wasnt like Amby didn’t convert to Buddhism instead of islam or Christianity just because he had some love for Hindus. He was a Dharma Bhrast as per Savarkar ji.
It was simply because he couldn’t manage to do it or else he would.
Do you What was the consequence of Ambedkar’s love for Islam?
Many Mahars (ambys community) did convert to Islam by hearing speeches of Ambedkar.
This is witnessed by A chambhar leader, P.N Rajbhoj who accused Amby of misdirecting his followers in Bombay chronicle.
When the entire country was protesting against British for the independence of Bharat, Ambedkar had fully supported British going against the congress government.
Here’s my previous thread on the details of his open support to British and opposing Indian Independence.
Anyway, finally congress formed its government & was fighting against British for independence.
In 1939 when British government wasn’t giving any proper direction regarding independence, congress resigned in protest.
Of course Md. Ali Jinnah was celebrating it as deliverance day for the resignation of congress.
Guess who else was celebrating with Jinnah being his partner in crime?
Our so called greatest Freedom fighter Amby ji.
At one point even some sections of Muslims were found to be opposing “Deliverance Day” So the anti-Hindu protest ended up being a partner-in-crime protest by only Jinnah & Amby.
The only reason Amby didn’t convert to Islam and chose Buddhism, as per Savarkar, was only for personal ambition - if he could amass a huge number of neo Buddhists, he could establish an independent Buddhist state which wasnt possible by converting to islam.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.