Unlike popularly believed by many RW Hindus that amby was anti-Islam, Amby not only wanted to convert to Islam rejecting Buddhism he was also a partner in crime with Jinnah against Hindus.
THREAD 🧵 SOME LESSER KNOWN FACTS ABOUT AMBEDKAR ON HIS BIRTHDAY.
Amby in His “Bahiskrit Bharat” exhorted his community under the bold heading “If you have to convert, become Musalman”.
He asked his community to convert to islam after rejecting the futility of becoming Buddhist and arya samajist.
Veer Savarkar, in his kesari clearly wrote “Amby didn’t do us any favor by not converting to Islam or Christianity” just like what many RW Hindus think today.
Savarkar mentions how Amby used to sing the sweetness of Islam and considered it the best religion.
Amby insisted that he was drawn to Buddhist philosophy from childhood after reading a book Buddha vichara.
Savarkar ji had called out Amby’s bluff on Buddhism & asked an apt question- if amby was so fond of Buddhism from his childhood how did he ask his followers to embrace islam or Christianity which considered Buddha as Infidel & heathen?
Thus proving him as a liar.
According to Savarkar ji, It wasnt like Amby didn’t convert to Buddhism instead of islam or Christianity just because he had some love for Hindus. He was a Dharma Bhrast as per Savarkar ji.
It was simply because he couldn’t manage to do it or else he would.
Do you What was the consequence of Ambedkar’s love for Islam?
Many Mahars (ambys community) did convert to Islam by hearing speeches of Ambedkar.
This is witnessed by A chambhar leader, P.N Rajbhoj who accused Amby of misdirecting his followers in Bombay chronicle.
When the entire country was protesting against British for the independence of Bharat, Ambedkar had fully supported British going against the congress government.
Here’s my previous thread on the details of his open support to British and opposing Indian Independence.
Anyway, finally congress formed its government & was fighting against British for independence.
In 1939 when British government wasn’t giving any proper direction regarding independence, congress resigned in protest.
Of course Md. Ali Jinnah was celebrating it as deliverance day for the resignation of congress.
Guess who else was celebrating with Jinnah being his partner in crime?
Our so called greatest Freedom fighter Amby ji.
At one point even some sections of Muslims were found to be opposing “Deliverance Day” So the anti-Hindu protest ended up being a partner-in-crime protest by only Jinnah & Amby.
The only reason Amby didn’t convert to Islam and chose Buddhism, as per Savarkar, was only for personal ambition - if he could amass a huge number of neo Buddhists, he could establish an independent Buddhist state which wasnt possible by converting to islam.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Contrary to propaganda, Shudras were not only students but were well established teachers as well, teaching every caste groups.
Although majority teachers were Brahmanas, other castes & communities shared the profession without any hindrance imposed by customs & traditions.
Survey found 6 teachers from “Chandal” caste and many students from Chandals & Doms.
Infact most from so called “lower castes” used to flock to indigenous Hindu schools as compared to the missionaries.
Data by the British themselves reveal that it was the caste group called Shudras and the castes considered below them, dominated in thousands of the pre existing Hindu Gurukuls.
This education system was possible due to the sophisticated arrangements of the pre British Indian policies that was devised by Hindus.
Wikipedia is the source of their knowledge & then they cry How Indians are replacing them. 😹
🧵THREAD
1. India Had Educational Institutes from Vedic age.
2. British established Sanskrit institutions in India so that they could convert Native Indians into Christianity by circulating their scriptures in native language.
3. According to the reports of British themselves there were 1,00,000 institutions existing in almost every corner of India.
4. According to the reports of British themselves Indian institutions had far better educational system which were copied in England.
Even Panini who has been dated between 7th & 4th century BCE has mentioned in details about Educational Institutes in India dedicated to Vedic literature to Sanskrit Grammar, phonetics, linguistics.
He also described how students used to enrol in such institutions.
Vedic sage like Yajnavalkya has mentioned about legal documentation of people studying in Vedic Charanas. That much organised these institutions were.
Patanjali describes that every Vedic institutions used to teach Panini’s Astadhyayi- Sanskrit Grammar
The fundamental theorem of Calculus comes from Aryabhata and developed by Indians over generations.
Certain preliminary concepts of the infinitesimal Calculus and analysis can be traced back to Siddhanta-siromani written by a Hindu Mathematician and astronomer Bhaskaracharya in 1150.
Those who proudly call themselves American today and attack H1B legal Indians are the ones whose ancestors were illegal invaders.
Their ancestors flooded America, slaughtering native men, forcing women into prostitution, and showing no mercy even to children and pregnant women.
Wherever Christianity went, it left a trail of destruction and havoc, a stark contrast to the legal Indians they now condemn.
Tens of thousands of hapless Indians (Native Americans) were exterminated outright: the Spanish “forced their way into native settlements,” wrote the eyewitness Bartolomé de las Casas,
“slaughtering everyone they found there, including small children, old men & pregnant women.
Those natives that weren’t killed were worked to death in gold mines. Women were made to work hard as slave & were made prostitutes.
The massacre was so huge that Hispaniola’s native population collapsed from a whooping 8 million to merely 20,000 in less than 3 decades.
There is no proof of Thomas actually coming to India or being martyred there.
The story was concocted by Syrian Christians who came to India as refugees to escape from persecution. India gave them refuge with open arms.
To secure their place in India they not only concocted this myth but also persecuted Hindus & broke our temples.
The source of this story is attributed to an apocryphal text- hagiography Acts of Thomas.
The text mentions the apostle going from Palestine to a desert like country where people have persian names.
Kerala is a lush green state and not a desert. The text doesn’t mention anything close to Kerala or India.
K.S Latourette, in A History of the Expansion of Christianity, dismisses any possibility of Christians coming to India before 3rd century
The first Christians to arrive in India were the Syrian Christians. They were 400 refugees who were fleeing religious persecution by the Persian Sapor II.
Ambedkar 🧵Was he really a messiah who wanted to uplift Dalit as he is promoted today?
Or was he a loyal sepoy of British whose agenda was to divide Hindu society & thwart Nationalist struggle for Independence?
Let’s dig in to history.
P.S Ambedkar is NOT our God
All India Dalit Varga Sangh which was actually fighting for Dalit rights, was banned by the British. Why did Ambedkar separate himself from the Sangh if he really cared for Dalits?
Reason: 1. To boost his image as the most/only important dalit leader so he can easily make dalits leave Hinduism. 2. Divide & weaken Hindu society that was rising against British.
Nationalist movement & demand for independence was growing strong among Hindus.
To curb these nationalists, British came up with a master plan.
They started to promote those elements among Hindu society who can work for the British & break Hindu society from within by making one group fight against another instead of asking freedom from British.