Russia has two main weapons - money and bluff.
20 years of soft power, lobbies and corruption and we have a UN where Russia occupies the chair of Security Council, Iran chair of Disarmament, Saudi Arabia as chair of Gender Equality and Women's Rights. Now Russia is trying
1/13
to use all the possibilities of hybrid warfare, pushing for escalation in all zones of influence available to it. But Putin, as always, miscalculated. From the very beginning, things don't go quite according to plan. Putin expected that he would ride across Eastern Europe
2/13
with tanks to the borders of the former USSR, intimidating the West with a nuclear baton. The bluff was turned against him. Because his army, faced with real force, stalled. Because it, too, was a complete bluff. The Ukrainian army was not comparable even to neighboring
3/13
Poland, not in numbers, but in equipment and modern weapons. But instead of taking Kyiv, we are discussing taking small villages. So, the population of Avdiivka before the war was about 30K. The fact that Iran attacked Israel at the instigation of Russia is almost beyond
4/13
doubt. However, its result is almost zero. If Iran and Israel start a new war between themselves, then fuel prices will definitely go up. Putin benefits from rising oil prices. Unlike Ukraine's bombing of Russian refineries, this has a direct impact. When the United States
5/13
expressed concern that Ukraine was destroying Russian refineries and this would affect fuel prices, there was no logic in this. Refineries do not produce oil, but only process it, and their destruction cannot affect the price of raw materials. It is clear that Russian
6/13
agents of influence were at work again. Oil is still one of the main exports, despite sanctions and oil price cap. However, sanctions, although slowly, are working. The economic situation in Russia is really bad, despite some progress in Ukraine, it is obvious that they
7/13
lack equipment and other resources. They are already carrying out banzai attacks on Ural trucks without armor. And advances of several kilometers and the capture of a couple of villages do not have major strategic significance. That is why Russia cannot carry out
8/13
mobilization. They cannot equip the required number of soldiers. The discussed attack on Kharkov is the same bluff that Russia always uses. The goal is to convince the West that helping Ukraine is pointless, since it will lose anyway. It’s very difficult for Ukraine now, but
9/13
Russia’s situation is getting worse every day. Although officially inflation is 7.5%, its real figures are about 14-17% according to experts on this topic. After the Iranian attack, it is possible that the aid to Ukraine, which the Republicans have been blocking for eight
10/13
months, with one stroke of Johnson’s pen, will be sent to Israel. And the news will talk less about Ukraine. This is exactly what Russia is trying to achieve. However, this was a common package for Ukraine and Israel. Let's see how events develop. Russia is doing poorly on
11/13
the Ukrainian front, but on the other fronts of the hybrid war it is successful. Despite the fact that the opinions of decision-makers in the United States often differ from the opinions of the actual majority, they still remain decision-makers. Some of Russia's main allies
12/13
are sitting in the White House now. However, Russia's loss in this war is inevitable. Russia has no chance of winning. Attempts to drag Iran and Israel into a new conflict show that Russia is in despair.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
According to BND estimates, last year Russia’s military spending may have amounted to almost half of the state budget and around 10% of the country’s GDP. According to the German intelligence service, Russia is spending significantly more on the war and its armed forces
🧵
than it has declared in recent years. Since the start of the war against Ukraine in February 2022, Russia’s defense budget has increased sharply every year. In addition, Russia’s interpretation of “defense spending” differs significantly from the NATO definition, German
intelligence officials note. A comprehensive analysis of budget data conducted by BND shows that Russia’s defense budget in recent years was 66% higher than officially reported. Unaccounted expenditures include, for example, construction projects of the Ministry of Defense,
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky explained why he sharply criticized Europe at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He made these remarks during a meeting with journalists in Kyiv, according to a correspondent from European Pravda. Zelensky said he had grounds for critical
🧵
statements toward Europe after a lack of funding led to a shortage of air defense missiles, allowing Russia to strike Kyiv’s energy infrastructure. Zelensky did not deny that his speech may have sounded overly harsh from European capitals and explained this by saying that
Ukraine and the rest of Europe live in different information spaces. He also acknowledged that the differences are not only informational but also emotional in how events are perceived. The president explained that his Davos speech was preceded by heavy strikes on energy
Putin is losing the game he himself started. His bet was placed on a return to the world of the 19th and early 20th centuries - a world of empires and spheres of influence, where Europe, America, Africa, and Asia are divided among several “superpowers.” In Putin’s vision of
1/19
the world, there were supposed to be three such powers: the United States, Russia, and China. However, the real transformation of the global order is unfolding in a completely different way. The key failure is Ukraine. At the end of the fourth year of war, Russia has still
2/19
been unable to subjugate it. The army is visibly degrading, human and technological resources are being exhausted, the economy is held together by military spending and gray schemes, and the state increasingly resembles an overextended empire losing its ability to govern
3/19
Within NATO, the possibility of conducting a special joint mission in Greenland is being considered in order to accommodate the interests of US President Donald Trump. This week, the US president once again stated that he wants Greenland. Military intervention is not being 1/8
ruled out. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen previously said that this would mean the end of the Alliance if the United States were to begin military action against her country. On Thursday morning, the 32 ambassadors of the Alliance gathered for their weekly meeting. 2/8
It took place in a "calm atmosphere." Denmark raised the Greenland issue in a "positive and forward-looking manner," NOS insiders reported. The US ambassador to NATO, Whitaker, also reportedly spoke in a conciliatory tone. As became clear during the meeting, almost all 3/8
Russia has once again staged a media stunt with the story about a drone attack on Putin’s residence. In the Novgorod region no one heard air raid sirens, yet according to Lavrov, 91 drones were launched from Ukraine and all of
1/25
them were shot down. There is not a single video and not a single piece of evidence. Why is this needed? This entire performance was staged specifically for Trump. Putin personally called the American president and told him about it. Russia has long convinced Trump that it
2/25
is Zelensky together with the “warmongering shadow government of Europe” who allegedly do not want the war to end. This show was played out so that Ukraine would be blamed for the failure of peace talks. Unfortunately, with Trump, this works. Meanwhile, Lavrov declares that
3/25
Daily strikes by Ukrainian drones and missiles on Russian oil depots, warehouses and refineries have created an image in the information space of a “leaky” Russian air defense system. This image sharply contrasts with what Russian propaganda had been instilling in its audience🧵
for decades, namely the idea of an “impenetrable shield” capable, according to Defense Minister Andrey Belousov, of intercepting up to 97 percent of targets. The reality of a full scale war has proven far more complex. Ukraine has not managed to destroy Russian air defense as a
single integrated system, but it has succeeded in exposing its real limits. As analysis by the Royal United Services Institute shows, the strength of Russian air defense depends not only on missiles and radars, but also on industry, logistics and the ability to replenish losses