Ukrainians are understandably upset that the West would deploy forces to help Israel (not a NATO member) shoot down Iranian missiles but won't do the same for Ukraine. This help, however, comes at a great price for Israel, and carries a valuable lesson for Ukraine. 1/19
Since the early decades of its existence, when Israel was attacked by its Arab neighbors, it fought alone, just like Ukraine is now fighting alone against Russia. Both countries bought and received some weapons from other countries but no one fought alongside them. 2/19
Starting in the late 1970s, Israel became increasingly dependent on US weapons as both the reward and price of achieving a cold peace with Egypt. 3/19
At the time, Israel had its own (Kfir/Nesher) fighter jet program and it sought to be as militarily independent as possible, especially in the realm of air power, which is the backbone of Israeli security. 4/19
The peace treaty eventually led to Israel giving up domestic jet production in favor of American F-16s/F-15s. US jet manufacturers didn't want the Israeli Lavi jet competing with American F-16 exports, and the ensuing pressure forced Israel to lose even more independence. 5/19
Meanwhile, Egypt not only received the strategically important Sinai peninsula which Israel had gained in a defensive war, but it also started receiving modern American jets to replace inferior Soviet equipment. 6/19
America gained two more military clients, while subsidizing US weapons manufacturers, and Egypt did not lose any independence because, unlike Israel, it did not have a successful domestic jet program. 7/19
Most importantly, the US gained critical leverage over Israel, whose security now depends on US willingness to provide parts, munitions, and upgrades to US-manufactured Israeli jets, which are perhaps the most critical Israeli military asset (outside of nukes). 8/19
With Israel's deep dependence on American jets, the US can now easily set arbitrary limits on Israel's ability to defend itself. This has been the case for decades and the latest example is the arm-twisting by team Biden to prevent Israel from finishing off Hamas in Rafah. 9/19
Team Biden is applying similar pressure on Ukraine to prevent it from striking oil refineries in Russia. Even though US aid to Ukraine has mostly stopped, Ukrainians still hope to finally receive American weapons and have mostly heeded US warnings. 10/19
US military aid is never a gift. It's always a subsidy for US weapons manufacturers and a way of controlling friends and allies, often against their best interests. Frequently, it's a product of US domestic politics and a disservice even to American national interests. 11/19
By helping Israel shoot down Iranian missiles, the US is entrenching itself even more deeply in Israeli security considerations and gaining additional levers of control. 12/19
As a result of American assistance, Israelis are increasingly conditioned to think that they cannot survive without American help, which embeds America even more deeply into Israeli domestic politics, further undermining Israel's ability to properly defend itself. 13/19
Even though a much weaker Israel overcame much greater odds for decades without US assistance, Israeli society, from the ordinary person on the street to the PM's office, has become increasingly subservient to American whims. 14/19
Ukraine is now much more like an earlier version of Israel. It is largely alone and because it is less dependent on a single country, such as the US, it can avoid repeating the mistakes Israel made. 15/19
To maintain strategic autonomy, Ukraine will need to be more like France. As much as possible, it will need to build its own weapons, perhaps in partnership with real allies, even if that is more capital intensive (it's better for the economy). 16/19
In the long-term, avoiding US weapons would be preferable, although of course, in the short-term they are a much needed stopgap measure. Ukraine should diversify and decentralize weapons manufacturing to the maximum extent possible. 17/19
Ukraine always had a relatively advanced military-industrial complex and it should work with countries like South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, UK, France, Israel, and the Baltic and Nordic states to decouple it and its partners from US domestic politics. 18/19
The US should have done far more to help Ukraine, but if there's any silver lining in America's decline, it's that Ukraine will not only be free from Russian domination, it can also preserve independence from Russia appeasers, colluders, and cowering deescalation managers. 19/19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Instead of simply letting Ukraine attempt costly obstacle breaching operations in the south, Russia has chosen to also counterattack Ukrainian forces, which has slowed the Ukrainian counteroffensive, but forced Russia to deploy more reserves prematurely. 🧵
Russia's defense of the land it grabbed in the south was supposed to be relatively straightforward: Ukraine would hit Russian fortifications, lose men & equipment from mines & artillery strikes while Russian forces would benefit from smaller casualties as they would be defending.
Russia's defense seemed to work, as Ukraine lost scarce Western armor in the early days of its probing attacks, but then Ukraine liberated several towns, including Piatykhatky, which could lead to the liberation of Vasylivka, threatening Russian positions along the Dnipro.
2 weeks after Russia's destruction of the Kakhovka dam, a WMD event, and the West has no response. Budanov says Russia mined the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant. Feeding off Western weakness, Putin will be tempted to blow it up knowing he'll get away with it & keep the West trembling.
As the Ukrainian counteroffensive succeeds, Putin will resort to any means that can slow it down. His main tools are nuclear bluffing and deniability. He can scare the West by threatening to use nukes and instead blow up a nuclear power plant, while denying responsibility.
Putin is deathly afraid of being held responsible for anything except that which will make him appear great. He denied that he ordered the operation to seize Crimea until it had succeeded. His foes keep dying, but officially he never has anything to do with it.
Ukraine has launched what many, including Russia, believe to be its long-awaited counteroffensive. Combining information from a variety of sources with publicly available information, here are some important details to bear in mind as events unfold. 🧵
According to Russian/Soviet military doctrine, defenses are organized roughly as follows: Behind minefields and other other obstacles is the first echelon of defense, which is manned by the least capable soldiers who are lightly armed. They're the defensive cannon fodder.
The goal of the first echelon is to hold out as long as possible, exhausting the attacking side, which will then, in theory, be less able to face additional defensive echelons, which are held in reserve, often dozens of kilometers from the front lines.
Prigozhin threatened to withdraw his Wagner mercenaries from Bakhmut on May 10 because he alleges that the Russian military is depriving his forces of ammunition, sabotaging his attempts to capture the city. Much of what he says is political spin. Here's why: 🧵
Although there is a conflict between various factions in the Putin regime (something that Putin has always allowed as a way to prevent any one faction from becoming too powerful), there are few indications that Wagner is suffering from a severe ammunition shortage.
Ukrainian soldiers defending Bakhmut report that Wagner fighters continue storming the city with the support of intense Russian shelling and bombing, which is pulverizing city blocks. Russia has clearly prioritized Bakhmut and committed massive resources to capture it.
A fire has erupted at the Ilsky oil refinery in Krasnodar Krai, Russia near the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk, after a suspected drone strike. It is an important part of the fuel infrastructure in southern Russia and Russian-occupied southern Ukraine/Crimea.
This is one more in a series of suspected Ukrainian strikes in southern Russia and Russian-occupied Crimea that are likely shaping operations that will weaken Russia's ability to sustain its forces in southern Ukraine (which includes Crimea).
Long-range Ukrainian drone strikes are also meant to stretch Russian air defense systems, which, until recently, Russia has been able to concentrate almost entirely inside Ukraine (reconfiguring some of them, such as the S-300, to hit ground targets).
Russian nationalists are circulating an in-depth analysis of the military crisis facing Russia. In short: Russian troops are unprepared, underequipped, poorly led and will be defeated unless Russian leaders change course, which they are unwilling to do. 🧵 kcpn.info/articles/%D0%B…
The analysis paints a bleak picture of the Russian army, especially it's inability to wage modern wars that require high levels of command and control as well as highly mobile units, not stormtroopers who are sent on suicidal missions by blockheaded Soviet-style generals.
The authors say that assaulting Bakhmut plays into Ukrainian hands and further weakens the Russian military, which is taking full advantage of Russia's incompetent military leadership. They say the same mistakes are repeated over and over, and lessons are not learned.