And if the bond market is ugly, everyone else suffers.
🧵
2/15
First, let's remember how this year started.
On December 18, 2023, BofA published its December 2023 Global Fund Manager Survey.
This graphic shows that these managers were the most bullish on rates since they started asking the question 20 years ago (2003).
3/15
Global fund managers agreed that 2024 would be the best time to be long-duration (lower rates) in the last 2 decades.
They were more bullish on rates now than on the 2008 financial crisis or the 2020 global economy shutdown (both were massive gains, if long-duration).
4/15
How's it going? Bad!
Through April 15, the Bloomberg Domestic Agg Index YTD total return is -3.11% (blue)
This is the 49th year of data (1976). Only 1980, 1994, and 2022 were worse through April 15.
All those years were historically bad years.
Not good
5/15
Since it was a survey of GLOBAL managers, how is the Bloomberg GLOBAL Agg index doing? Also, bad!
YTD, it is down -4.25% (blue line)
This index started in 1990 (35 years ago). Only 2022 was worse; that was the worst year in the bond market since the Civil War (1865)!
6/15
And here is the 30-year Treasury Total Return.
YTD, it is down 9.80% (blue line).
The data starts in 1977, so 48 years of data. Only 2009, 2021, and 2022 were worse YTD through April 15.
Long TLT has been a horror show.
7/15
If these global fund managers had a meeting in December to position to LOSE AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE, how would it differ from what they have done YTD?
Why so bad? Because of their assumptions, they have been way off the mark.
9/15
They overwhelmingly thought the economy would have a soft landing.
As I like to say, "This was never the case."
10/15
They were also 90% sure inflation would fall in 2024 leading to an equally high conviction that central banks (the Fed) would cut rates.
How does that look now on April 15!!
11/15
So, when does this bond sell-off stop?
To put it bluntly, saying "soft landing," "last mile to 2%," and "the Fed will cut three times in 2024" becomes embarrassing in public.
12/15
When we get to this point, it will signal that all the positioning for these outcomes, which is killing their performance YTD, has become too painful and has been reversed.
13/15
Interestingly, as I'm writing these posts, I have Bloomberg TV on in the background, and they have fund managers from organizations that manage trillions in assets, still talking about a "soft landing" and "last mile to 2%" and "three rate cuts in 2024."
14/15
So, we are not there yet.
Global Fund managers still think reading from their 2024 outlooks published in January is a good idea.
They have yet to figure out that these are the roadmaps that got them into trouble in the first place.
15/15
Final thought, when do higher rates "bother" the stock market?
When the 10-year hits 4.50%. Or starting last week.
See below ... the S&P 500 close today (April 15) was its lowest close since February 20.
Here is the correct chart.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The repost below expresses a common belief that risk assets are effective inflation hedges.
History suggests they are not.
This chart shows that the inflation of the 1960s and 1970s wiped out 64% of the after-inflation stock gains by 1982 (meaning inflation beat stocks by 64%). And all inflation-adjusted gains of the previous 27+ years (back to 1954) were gone (meaning inflation beat stocks over the previous 27 years).
It took until 1992, 28 years later, for stocks to finally start beating cumulative inflation since 1966.
2/3
Too many vastly underestimate the devastating impact of inflation.
Since the 2021 peak, when the Fed called inflation"transitory," stocks have only beaten inflation by just 15% (with dividends).
So a 10% to 12% correct and a little bit more inflation and four years of relative purchasing power is gone (meaning you are no better off than four years ago).
3/3
As I argue here, the crypto crowd also forgets inflation when they make their long-term forecasts.
🧵on yields and yield curve
---
The 30-year yield made a new 2024 close high yesterday.
Now, the highest yield since November 2023.
2/6
The 10-year yield is just eight basis points away from a new 2024 high.
Two trading days left this year.
3/6
The 2-year funds spread is the narrowest since March 2023 (bottom panel).
The massive reversal to negative in March 2023 was driven by the string of bank failures highlighted by Silicon Valley Bank. These failures were driven by fear of unrealized bond losses. So, while the Fed subsequently hiked three more times through July 2023, this spread inverting signaled the "end is near" for the rate-hiking cycle.
Now, at just -5 bps, this spread is the narrowest it has been in ~20 months and close to signaling "the end is near," if not already done, on the rate-cutting cycle.
TLT is the iShares 20-Treasury ETF, one of today's largest and most influential bond ETFs.
I've been arguing that the bond market rise in yields as the Fed cutting rates has been a rejection of the easing cycle. The bond market is saying the Fed has the wrong policy.
Monetary easing is not necessary given the strength of the US economy (See Atlanta Fed GDPnow) and the coming "Trump Stimulus. Fed easing is raising inflation expectations and driving yields higher.
Here is a chart of TLT's price (black) and cumulative flows (red).
From the day the Fed started hiking (March 16, 2022) to the November 7, 2024, FOMC meeting (labeled), cumulative inflows were steady, totaling over $55 billion.
A reasonable interpretation is that bond investors agreed with the Fed's policy from March 2022 to November 2024, even if it was hiking, as it was fighting inflation.
However, since the Fed cut again in November, bond investors have reversed and fled the bond market. Almost $10 billion has left TLT.
2/3
The bottom panel is a rolling 30-day flow into TLT. The last 30 days have seen a cumulative outflow of $8.69B, easily the largest 30-day outflow in TLT's history.
Again, this outflow started with the November 7 Fed cut, which I interpret as the market screaming "no" at the Fed about its move.
3/3
The chart below shows TLT's volume since 2023. The blue bars label the six highest-volume days in TLT's history. No volume day was over 80 million before 2023.
Thursday, December 19, was the record volume day at 99 million. This was the day after the Fed cut. The previous record was November 6, the day before the Fed cut on November 7.
The market is focused on the Fed meeting, not payroll or CPI days. Investors believe the Fed is making a mistake by cutting rates when it is not needed.
It turns out that the biggest soap opera in Trump's nominations is the Treasury Secretary. As the graphic below shows, it is as close to 50/50 as it gets.
---
My Take
The Treasury Secretary gets to sit in the room and opine on policy. And their voice will be taken seriously.
But they do not set the policy; the President does. When the president says what they will do, they expect the Treasury Secretary to sell that policy as if it were theirs.
The second part, selling something they don't believe in but are told to do, is something Jamie Dimon will never do, so he will never be the Treasury Secretary. (Dimon wants to tell everyone else what they should sell).
Lutnick will sell whatever you tell him and do it with gusto! Bessert will do so too, but he does not command the room like Lutnick.
In other words, the Treasury Secretary is the administration's chief spokesman. This is a sales job, and it needs a salesperson.
The problem with Yellen was that she needed to be a better salesperson. Yes, she is an outstanding economist, but she was never a good spokesperson for the Biden Agenda.
She would have been a better National Economic Council head, the "smart person in the shadows advising the President."
If I had to guess ....
Lutnick = Treasury Secretary
Bessert = National Economic Council head