And if the bond market is ugly, everyone else suffers.
🧵
2/15
First, let's remember how this year started.
On December 18, 2023, BofA published its December 2023 Global Fund Manager Survey.
This graphic shows that these managers were the most bullish on rates since they started asking the question 20 years ago (2003).
3/15
Global fund managers agreed that 2024 would be the best time to be long-duration (lower rates) in the last 2 decades.
They were more bullish on rates now than on the 2008 financial crisis or the 2020 global economy shutdown (both were massive gains, if long-duration).
4/15
How's it going? Bad!
Through April 15, the Bloomberg Domestic Agg Index YTD total return is -3.11% (blue)
This is the 49th year of data (1976). Only 1980, 1994, and 2022 were worse through April 15.
All those years were historically bad years.
Not good
5/15
Since it was a survey of GLOBAL managers, how is the Bloomberg GLOBAL Agg index doing? Also, bad!
YTD, it is down -4.25% (blue line)
This index started in 1990 (35 years ago). Only 2022 was worse; that was the worst year in the bond market since the Civil War (1865)!
6/15
And here is the 30-year Treasury Total Return.
YTD, it is down 9.80% (blue line).
The data starts in 1977, so 48 years of data. Only 2009, 2021, and 2022 were worse YTD through April 15.
Long TLT has been a horror show.
7/15
If these global fund managers had a meeting in December to position to LOSE AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE, how would it differ from what they have done YTD?
Why so bad? Because of their assumptions, they have been way off the mark.
9/15
They overwhelmingly thought the economy would have a soft landing.
As I like to say, "This was never the case."
10/15
They were also 90% sure inflation would fall in 2024 leading to an equally high conviction that central banks (the Fed) would cut rates.
How does that look now on April 15!!
11/15
So, when does this bond sell-off stop?
To put it bluntly, saying "soft landing," "last mile to 2%," and "the Fed will cut three times in 2024" becomes embarrassing in public.
12/15
When we get to this point, it will signal that all the positioning for these outcomes, which is killing their performance YTD, has become too painful and has been reversed.
13/15
Interestingly, as I'm writing these posts, I have Bloomberg TV on in the background, and they have fund managers from organizations that manage trillions in assets, still talking about a "soft landing" and "last mile to 2%" and "three rate cuts in 2024."
14/15
So, we are not there yet.
Global Fund managers still think reading from their 2024 outlooks published in January is a good idea.
They have yet to figure out that these are the roadmaps that got them into trouble in the first place.
15/15
Final thought, when do higher rates "bother" the stock market?
When the 10-year hits 4.50%. Or starting last week.
See below ... the S&P 500 close today (April 15) was its lowest close since February 20.
Here is the correct chart.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Economists’ median estimate for tomorrow’s payroll release is 215k. Estimates range from 150k to 250k.
Note that February was initially reported as 275k. So, every one of the 61 forecasts has payrolls declining from last month.
2/5
Since the beginning of 2022, economists have often underestimated the actual payroll release.
During these 26 months, economists underestimated payrolls 22 times.
3/5
The BLS surveys 120k "establishments" employing about one-third of the US labor force.
Lately, the survey’s response rate has been falling and becoming an issue.
The February payroll report’s initial response rate was 66.9% (blue line), which is higher than January's 56% (and December's 49%) but remains low compared to past decades.
As the red and purple lines show, the BLS follows up in the ensuing months to get the missing responses. But even these are falling.
Here are a couple of thoughts on tomorrow's PCE report (remember, there will be no market reaction as they are closed).
I will focus on what the Fed focuses on: Core PCE.
Below are the 57 economist forecasts, as surveyed by Bloomberg.
For the February Core PCE measure, the median estimate is 0.3%.
52 of the 57 are projecting 0.30%.
1 of 57 is projecting 0.4%
4 of 57 is projecting 0.2%
At his March 20 Presser, Powell said he expects 0.30%
Last Night, Governor Waller said in his speech that he also expects 0.3%.
So ... let's take a wild guess as to what everyone is looking for 🤔
2/4
PCE is compiled from the same survey of prices from which CPI and PPI are derived.
So, once these reports are released, it is an exercise to reweight them for core PCE. This produces a fairly accurate forecast.
For the February Core PCE report, this is 0.3%, with a few forecasts rounding to 0.2% or 0.4%.
This next chart shows Core PCE ... year-over-year as the line and month-over-month are the bars.
Blue is actual through December.
Red is January, which is subject to revision (and expected to be slightly higher; see @NickTimiraos above), and February (released tomorrow morning).
Orange is a projection for the next several months, assuming the upcoming month's average is 0.33%, its two-year average (orange bars).
If the assumption of 0.33% monthly Core PCE is accurate, again, it is the average of the last two years, and the last two months, then Core PCE should bottom around 2.8% and move well above 3%.
Why? See the green bars in the bottom panel. These are the monthly measures to be dropped from the year-over-year calculation (known as the base effect).
They are falling, and the "hurdle" to keeping Core PCE "sticky" at 3+% this year is getting easier to jump over.
If so, this should end the discussion of rate cuts.