Today, a post about viral persistence, antivirals and how it plays into the complexity of #LongCOVID and other post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS). If you've been following me for a while, you probably know that I've been saying for a few years now that LC is a complex 1/
chronic disease state that will not have *one* cure, because it doesn't have one root cause that is common across all pwLC. When we're thinking about PAIS, I tend to like the "burning house" analogy: the house can be burning quickly (aggressively progressive disease), slowly 2/
(kind of a 'smoldering' disease state), or intermittently (relapsing-remitting: you have terrible, disabling periods but then you return to baseline for a time). The house will burn at different rates depending on what the house is built of (genetics and past medical history). 3/
One thing is for sure - if you see a burning house and you want to save it, the first thing you need to do is put the fire out. As any firefighter will tell you: don't put the wrong thing on a fire - you might make it worse. In PAIS, the right drugs to put out the 'fire' 4/
really, really matter. Once you've put out the fire, is the job done? Of course not. You have fire damage in different rooms of the house (organ systems), and you need to repair that damage to make the house livable again. We need drugs, rehab and other interventions to 5/
rebuild the body from MCAS, POTS/dysautonomia, coagulopathy, gut dysbiosis, joint hypermobility, hormonal dysregulation, immune dysregulation, etc. But what if you have a burning house and you don't have the tools to put the fire out, what then? We can definitely deploy some 6/
of the tools we have to mitigate the damage and keep the house livable for a period of time - hell, you might even be able to make it nice. But it would be dangerous to forget that the house is still burning. So, for the people out there living with #LongCOVID and other PAIS: 7/
We don't know what sort of fire you have going on 100% of the time, some times the fire has already gone out and you do great with our rebuilding techniques, other times you need us to be firefighters. In all of it, the only certainty I can promise is that not all fires will 8/
be put out with the same tools. Now, let's drop the metaphors and talk plainly. I was excited about the @NIHDirector speaking so openly and transparently about viral persistence and #LongCOVID yesterday because the SCIENCE has pointed me to conclusion that it is likely that 9/
viral persistence is one of the "root cause" mechanisms at play in a proportion of people with #LongCOVID. We wrote a comprehensive review paper about it, led by @microbeminded2 and published it in a fancy journal and everything: 10/nature.com/articles/s4159…
Am I saying viral persistence is responsible for ALL the symptoms of LC? No. Am I saying antivirals will solve everything? Absolutely not. But I'm saying it is an important lead and we need to study it. To all those I have seen over the last 1-2 days saying "if antivirals 11/
cured #LongCOVID it would be cured by now", let me say this: we have not even scratched the surface of the surface of the work needed to create actionable antivirals to treat persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Paxlovid won't get it done - it barely penetrates tissue and as a 12/
protease inhibitor it simply stops replication so if the virus has infected cells with a slow/no turnover rate (i.e. the central nervous system) it won't do much. Antivirals and monoclonals also don't cross the blood brain barrier. This is a huge problem - there are emerging 13/
solutions to this problem, but they require research and funding and drug development and clinical trials. So, yesterday we celebrated a win: a mechanism that we have concluded based on available science to be a significant driver in #LongCOVID pathology was FINALLY formally 14/
acknowledged by the @NIHDirector as being an area worthy of significant research. This is HUGE because it has not been taken seriously by mainstream scientists (despite ample evidence) for four years. However, no one (serious) is saying "it is all viral persistence and we 15/
will stop researching everything else". Now, since this is the internet and the internet is great, I have no doubt that there will be a cluster of angry folks saying "Putrino is a grifter who is getting paid by big pharma to be pro-antivirals", the only thing I "am" is anti-16/
fire: We have cities full of houses that are on fire. We have to figure out why each one is burning. We have to figure out how to put each fire out safely. We have to figure out how to rebuild each house stronger and harder to burn. That's it. Happy national banana day. 🙏 /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I know #LongCovid twitter has been buzzing today bc @NIHDirector has unambiguously named viral persistence as a driver of LC pathobiology. I’m thrilled to see this too and I view it as an historic moment. However, today I’d like to do a little @microbeminded2 appreciation post 1/
In 2020, before the federal gvt had even acknowledged LC, and my team was burning out trying to manage 1000s of acute COVID patients and 100s of LC patients (then named “post-acute COVID Syndrome”/PACS), Dr Proal reached out to my team and told us about viral persistence and 2/
the role of persistent pathogens in other post-acute infection syndromes. I’ll freely admit I didn’t know what to do with the information she was sharing: I felt like we had a good hand on #LongCOVID just by treating dysautonomia and POTS but already in the back of my mind I 3/
The folks out there pushing Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for infection-associated disease states like #LongCOVID, #MECFS and chronic #Lyme produce bad science and peddle harmful/dangerous rhetoric are truly deplorable, but what's more, 1/
when you actually dig into their logic and rationale (outside of running expensive courses, siphoning gvt funding for pointless research and patting one another on the backs) for pushing GET and CBT, I think the most disappointing thing is just how simple their thinking is. 2/
Make no mistake, these are academics and clinicians who are IN LOVE with their own intelligence, yet when you push on the principles behind their research and their clinical processes, it's all so...underwhelming. I mean, imagine taking hundreds of millions of dollars of gvt 3/
Today is #LongCovidAwarenessDay. A day for acknowledgement of the now hundreds of millions of people worldwide who have had their lives indelibly changed by #LongCOVID. This year's Long COVID Awareness Day comes with an edge, though. If we were a thinking, anti-ableist 1/
society, when #LongCOVID was first emerging as a disease state that could cause permanent disability, government leaders would have understood the *existential* threat that we were facing and made decisive moves to protect the population. Instead we saw half measures and weak 2/
decisions that pandered to corporate interests and scoring political points. People with #LongCOVID were othered, patronized and gaslit whilst performative efforts were made to help. As the years have passed, we have seen more protections slip, we have seen more health 3/
This afternoon (US time) I was asked for comment on the recent statements on #LongCOVID in Australia. Here is the statement I provide:
As a scientist, an Australian and one of the world's leading authorities on LongCOVID I was disgusted to see John Gerrard's irresponsible 1/
comments regarding #LongCOVID in the media. The most prominent scientific journals in the world have published systematic reviews of the literature highlighting the fact that 7-12% of acute SARS-CoV-2 infections result in Long COVID - a chronic disease state that has no 2/
approved treatments. #LongCOVID can affect people of any age, gender and health status and according to Dr David Cutler, a leading health economist, it is on track to cost the US government $3.7 Trillion dollars. All consensus science points to the fact that Long COVID is a 3/
I wanted to share some additional thoughts, insights and next steps about our latest #LongCOVID research with the brilliant @VirusesImmunity and the work led by @SilvaJ_C, @taka_takehiro, @wood_jamie_1, @LauraTabacof and so many others. If this is the first time you're seeing 1/
this work, I highly recommend checking out @VirusesImmunity's breakdown of the study. It is detailed and complete. Rather than replicating that, I'm going to share some additional thoughts and next steps for the research. The first thing that this study provides us with some 2/
insight on is why #LongCOVID may disproportionately affect women. The findings of this study indicate that testosterone may be *protective* against the manifestation of not only certain LC symptoms, but also the overall severity of LC symptoms. Did you know that for decades, 3/
I've been busy the last week or so, you know, actually working the fucking problem and so I was unable to immediately react when the same old clown car of 'experts' (i.e. clinicians on twitter who have not actually read or understood the literature on #LongCOVID) tagged this 1/
and screenshotted my recent thread on #PEM and exercise. I tell you, these folks are nothing if not predictable, but it also goes to show their fundamental lack of understanding of the pathology at play. I mean, I can understand how a paper like this would excite a group of 2/
science deniers with poor research acumen. On the surface, it looks like a really solid paper showing that folks with #LongCOVID benefit from "physical and mental health rehabilitation". Let's dig deeper. The first funny thing about bringing #PEM into this argument is that 2/