In fact, some of the most groundbreaking scientific discoveries were made by Catholic clergy.
Here are the top 5 scientific breakthroughs made by priests…🧵 (thread)
5) Atomic Theory (Boscovich Model)
Roger Boscovich, a Croatian physicist, astronomer, and mathematician, was a Catholic priest in the Jesuit order. His model of the atom, the “Boscovich Model,” was a forerunner to modern atomic theory.
His theory was an attempt to find a middle way between Newton’s theory of gravity and Gottfried Leibniz's metaphysical theory of monad-points (points of original substance).
In addition to physics, Boscovich made significant astronomical observations; in particular the moon.
4) Seismology
One of the pioneers in the field of seismology was Fr. Giuseppe Mercalli in the late 19th and early 20th century.
He’s famous for developing the Mercalli Intensity Scale which measures the intensity of seismic shaking caused by earthquakes.
Though the Richter scale superseded his scale for magnitude measurement, the Mercalli scale remains the method for assessing the impact of earthquakes on people and buildings.
Mercalli’s commitment to science and his faith exemplify the harmony between the two realms.
3) Genetic Theory
Gregor Mendel, “the father of modern genetics,” was a 19th-century Augustinian friar and abbot. He developed Mendelian genetic theory by observing the inherited traits in pea plants, paving the way for our modern understanding of heredity.
Mendel’s discoveries were initially ignored. Notably Charles Darwin had no idea about Mendel’s work. It’s possible had he known, genetics would have developed much earlier.
The significance of his work was only finally realized after his death.
2) The Big Bang
The Big Bang theory of the universe’s origin was first posited by Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian astronomer. physicist, and priest. His theory shocked the scientific community when it was first published in 1927, but has since been widely accepted.
Lemaitre’s model upset the millennia-old belief of an eternal cosmos. His theory implied that everything came from an ultra-dense, tiny point, and its expansion birthed time and space.
Contrary to common belief, it was anti-religious sentiment that prevented the Big Bang theory from broad acceptance early on.
Atheist scientists were repulsed by the Big Bang's creationist overtones—it seemed too similar to the creation story in the Book of Genesis.
1) Heliocentrism
Nicolaus Copernicus was an early proponent of heliocentrism, the theory that the sun centered the solar system.
It’s possible that Copernicus, a Renaissance-era polymath dubbed the “father of modern astronomy,” was also a Catholic priest.
Copernicus held various positions within the Church, and the Catholic Encyclopedia claims he was ordained since in 1537 he was a candidate for the episcopal seat of Warmia, a seat that required ordination. Some scholars contest whether he was ever actually ordained though.
The idea that science and religion are at odds is a fairly new concept.
Despite the modern misconception, it’s historically been religious institutions, especially the Catholic Church, who have been the main drivers of scientific advancement in the West.
If you enjoyed this thread and would like to join the mission of promoting the beauty of western tradition, kindly repost the first post (linked below) and consider following: @thinkingwest
Great leaders lead from the front — they don't sit back and watch their men do all the work.
Today's world leaders should take note.
A thread on courageous leaders who fought alongside their troops🧵
1. Leonidas
The Spartan king showed his willingness to sacrifice for his people when he, along with a cohort of vastly outnumbered Greeks, fought to the death at Thermopylae in 480 BC.
Despite his death, he’s become immortal in the legend that surrounds his epic last stand.
2. Alexander the Great
Alexander was a huge inspiration to his troops as he led his men from the front during his unprecedented military campaigns.
His bravery came at a cost though—he suffered several injuries, notably a slash to the head and thigh, and an arrow to the lung.
Art funded by committee is inevitably generic and uninspiring.
But masterpieces — like the works of Raphael and Michelangelo — were funded by individual egos.
Here's why democracy produces ugly art, while aristocracy gives us masterworks...🧵
First, we need to understand how the great artistic periods like the Renaissance were funded.
A key factor in the proliferation of art was a concept called patronage, where princes, popes, and other influential people provided funds for painters, sculptors, and musicians.
Patronage was how artists made their living—they didn’t receive a steady income unless they were actively creating art.
Patrons would put up the funds for a project—often Church artwork or private commissions for nobility—and the artist would see that project through.
Another Caesar is coming, and Western civilization is at a turning point, says German historian Oswald Spengler.
He claimed we live in “the most trying times known to history of a great culture."
And there's no offramp.
Buckle up.
Here's what Spengler predicted...🧵
Oswald Spengler is best known for his two-volume work “Decline of the West”, first published in 1923.
A German schoolmaster turned reclusive scholar, Spengler presented a unique vision of history that predicted the rise and fall of civilizations…
His work became an instant success upon publication, selling 100,000 copies by 1926 as its philosophy — depicting western culture as a tired civilization amidst decline — resonated with German intellectuals looking to make sense of their predicament after WWI.
Most empires rise, fall, and leave only ruins to tell their tale.
But some empires never die, rising like a phoenix again and again from ashes to glory.
This is the concept of "translatio imperii" — how empires inspire empires and live forever... 🧵 (thread)
Translatio imperii — Latin for ‘transfer of rule’ — is the idea that one empire may live on as the successor of a former empire. It’s a natural extension of the succession of kings to the scale of nations and empires.
Why connect an empire to a previous one?
The main reason is one of legitimacy. By claiming lineage to a former empire, new rulers and conquerors cement their claims to power with a natural legal basis.
A thread on the great figures of history and the books that influenced them🧵
Alexander
According to Plutarch, Alexander was given an annotated copy of the Iliad which he carried with him everywhere.
He considered it a “perfect portable treasure of all military virtue and knowledge” and was especially fascinated by the character Achilles.
Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius was extremely well-read. His tutor Fronto described how the emperor read works of Cato the Elder, Cicero, Lucretius, and Seneca in addition to numerous Greek tragedies.
Among the most visible reminders of Rome's storied hegemony are its aqueducts.
These engineering marvels channeled the lifeblood of civilization for near a millennium.
Here’s how they worked🧵 (thread)
Rome’s aqueducts had humble origins, much like the city itself.
The first aqueduct, the Aqua Appia, was constructed in 312 BC to supply the city’s cattle market.
Its source could be found in a group of springs inhabiting a stretch of local marshland, flowing an impressive 10.2 miles to Rome from the east and emptying into the Forum Boarium.