The low fertility crisis is solvable, even though things look pretty bleak these days. Why be optimistic?
The single biggest ๐ถ factor is pro-natal belief and desired fertility.
And we know from history that we can change those values and turn things around. ๐งต, please share!
As @robinhanson recently explained in a widely read essay, there is a global 'monoculture' that has brought fertility rates down all over the world.
But if that can happen, can't values shift in the other direction too, and give us a more pro-natal ๐ culture? 2/11
Let's look at some examples that show the dramatic impact that values can have on the fertility. First up, France.
๐ซ๐ท went from having the lowest fertility rate in Europe in the 1800s to having the highest today. What happened? 3/11
After the French Revolution, a turn toward secularization saw ๐ซ๐ท birthrates crash far below the rest of Europe.
Then following humiliating defeats in both world wars, French leadership became continuously pro-natal, both in words and policy. That has made a big difference! 4/11
Next example, Mongolia. In Outer Mongolia (what we think of as ๐ฒ๐ณ today) TFR is around 2.7 births/woman while in adjacent Inner Mongolia (part of China) it is 0.75 (similar GDP)!
Why? ๐ฒ๐ณ in the Soviet sphere had pronatal influence while Inner Mongolia in ๐จ๐ณ had the opposite. 5/11
Talking about the Soviet sphere, the USSR urged women to have more children and gave out awards (Order of Maternal Glory, shown). No fan of Communism here, but there is something to be learned.
After 1989 when the pro-natal messages stopped, fertility rates plunged. 6/11
Next, a look at Israel.
Everyone knows ๐ฎ๐ฑ has the highest TFR in the OECD.
But how many know that Jewish birth rates in Europe prior to WWII were very low?
Israel's high fertility is not coincidence. It is intentional pronatalism borne of a will to survive after tragedy. 7/11
Looking at low birth rates around the world, these are not happenstance either.
The ultra-low fertility rates seen in East Asia are due in part to a history of explicitly anti-natal propaganda, as I have often written. 8/11
Understanding how much values matter for birth rates in either direction, it is no mystery why the religious have higher fertility rates almost everywhere.
Most faith traditions are infused with pro-natal beliefs, which strongly impacts attenders. 9/11
But not all faiths have high fertility. It matters what the natalist vibe is within that faith.
Abrahamic faiths tend to be pro-natal. Buddhism? Not so much.
Also, within faiths the message matters! In Georgia the orthodox patriarch created a ๐ถ boom just by asking for one! 10/11
In the face of global birth collapse, some think it's time to wind down our affairs. Nonsense!
We can control whether culture is pro-natal or anti-natal.
The anti-natalists already know this. The rest of us should take note. 11/11
(Follow @MoreBirths!)
A new map shows the last time each country in Europe reached replacement fertility.
Most western European countries, including the UK, France, Germany and Italy haven't had replacement fertility in more than 50 years.
This is the main reason for Europe's stagnation. ๐งต.
This map shows the sobering fact that once a country falls below replacement, it almost never bounces back.
Eastern Europe did not fall below replacement until the 1980s but has had exceptionally low fertility over the past 25 years. 2/4
The Americas have had healthy fertility until much more recently. The United States had replacement fertility as recently as 2007 and low birthrates are a recent problem in most of the hemisphere.
That is a big part of why the Americas have outperformed Europe economically. 3/4
A recent study found that giving men a pay raise led them to have more children, while giving women a pay raise led them to have fewer children. ๐งต.
For women, the effect of a pay raise was significantly reduced future fertility. A pay increase at 25 was associated with a large decrease in fertility at age 30, regardless of the skill level.
For men, a pay increase was associated with persistently higher fertility. 2/4
Why? The authors argue that "the substitution effect between children and labor supply is dominating for women while the income effect is dominating for men."
Since childcare falls more on women, the competition between work and family is greater for women than for men. 3/4
A newly published paper found pronatal policies only worked when supported by culture.
"Maternity benefits increased fertility only among women who grew up in religious families" in the Baltics.
This could explain why many pronatal policies have not boosted fertility more. ๐งต.
In 1982, there was a big expansion in child benefits in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania including maternity leave wage benefits, a cash payment for birth and 18 months of job protection.
Five East European countries with comparable economic systems did not get the benefits. 2/5
The study found, "among women who grew up in religious households, fertility went up by a statistically significant 5.7 percentage points representing a 46.3% increase."
Meanwhile, there was "no change in fertility among women who did not grow up in religious households." 3/5
A new study finds that work-from-home raises fertility more than any conventional family policy.
"Estimated lifetime fertility is greater by 0.32 children per woman when both partners WFH one or more days per week as compared to the case where neither does." ๐งต.
In this chart, a large effect is clearly seen, with fertility higher when either partner has some work-from-home and highest when both do.
The authors say this is not due to selection because fertility rose among those that unexpectedly got WFH, compared to those that didn't.
Raising the work-from-home share of either partner by seven percent raised the one-year fertility by a similar amount, which means that families that have WFH have considerably higher fertility on average.