More Births Profile picture
Apr 17, 2024 โ€ข 11 tweets โ€ข 6 min read โ€ข Read on X
The low fertility crisis is solvable, even though things look pretty bleak these days. Why be optimistic?
The single biggest ๐Ÿ‘ถ factor is pro-natal belief and desired fertility.
And we know from history that we can change those values and turn things around. ๐Ÿงต, please share!

Image
Image
Image
As @robinhanson recently explained in a widely read essay, there is a global 'monoculture' that has brought fertility rates down all over the world.
But if that can happen, can't values shift in the other direction too, and give us a more pro-natal ๐ŸŒŽ culture? 2/11

Image
Image
Image
Let's look at some examples that show the dramatic impact that values can have on the fertility. First up, France.
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท went from having the lowest fertility rate in Europe in the 1800s to having the highest today. What happened? 3/11 Image
After the French Revolution, a turn toward secularization saw ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท birthrates crash far below the rest of Europe.
Then following humiliating defeats in both world wars, French leadership became continuously pro-natal, both in words and policy. That has made a big difference! 4/11 Image
Next example, Mongolia. In Outer Mongolia (what we think of as ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ today) TFR is around 2.7 births/woman while in adjacent Inner Mongolia (part of China) it is 0.75 (similar GDP)!
Why? ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ in the Soviet sphere had pronatal influence while Inner Mongolia in ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ had the opposite. 5/11 Image
Talking about the Soviet sphere, the USSR urged women to have more children and gave out awards (Order of Maternal Glory, shown). No fan of Communism here, but there is something to be learned.
After 1989 when the pro-natal messages stopped, fertility rates plunged. 6/11Image
Image
Next, a look at Israel.
Everyone knows ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ has the highest TFR in the OECD.
But how many know that Jewish birth rates in Europe prior to WWII were very low?
Israel's high fertility is not coincidence. It is intentional pronatalism borne of a will to survive after tragedy. 7/11
Image
Image
Looking at low birth rates around the world, these are not happenstance either.
The ultra-low fertility rates seen in East Asia are due in part to a history of explicitly anti-natal propaganda, as I have often written. 8/11
Understanding how much values matter for birth rates in either direction, it is no mystery why the religious have higher fertility rates almost everywhere.
Most faith traditions are infused with pro-natal beliefs, which strongly impacts attenders. 9/11
Image
Image
But not all faiths have high fertility. It matters what the natalist vibe is within that faith.
Abrahamic faiths tend to be pro-natal. Buddhism? Not so much.
Also, within faiths the message matters! In Georgia the orthodox patriarch created a ๐Ÿ‘ถ boom just by asking for one! 10/11
Image
Image
In the face of global birth collapse, some think it's time to wind down our affairs. Nonsense!
We can control whether culture is pro-natal or anti-natal.
The anti-natalists already know this. The rest of us should take note. 11/11
(Follow @MoreBirths!)

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with More Births

More Births Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MoreBirths

Apr 3
A study in Sweden found that firstborn children tend to have more children of their own than those that came later in the birth order.

Why? It is likely because older siblings had exposure to babies growing up, while younger siblings did not. ๐Ÿงต. Image
Image
Image
The large study of siblings (N = 1.5 million) found firstborns tend to have significantly more children than those that came later.

The effect is especially strong for women. When girls have a chance to help with little ones, they have much stronger family desires later on.
2/4 Image
What about number of siblings? For both women and men, having more siblings tends to increase the number of children people have.

And once again, the effect is strongest for elder siblings, who got more chances to practice parenting. 3/4 Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 4
A new map shows the last time each country in Europe reached replacement fertility.

Most western European countries, including the UK, France, Germany and Italy haven't had replacement fertility in more than 50 years.

This is the main reason for Europe's stagnation. ๐Ÿงต. Image
This map shows the sobering fact that once a country falls below replacement, it almost never bounces back.

Eastern Europe did not fall below replacement until the 1980s but has had exceptionally low fertility over the past 25 years. 2/4 Image
Image
The Americas have had healthy fertility until much more recently. The United States had replacement fertility as recently as 2007 and low birthrates are a recent problem in most of the hemisphere.

That is a big part of why the Americas have outperformed Europe economically. 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 27
A big fail in the New York Times today with the claim that "31 is the new 21."

The Times leads readers to believe today's young women will make up lost fertility in their 30s and 40s.

But all evidence indicates they will not. ๐Ÿงต. Image
Image
First, the Times is ignorant of what recent research shows about age and infertility.

A big 2023 study of three million women by Geruso, Spears and LoPalo found that the ability to get pregnant is much lower in the 30s than the 20s.

So unfortunately, 31 is not the new 21. 2/4 Image
Image
Image
Second, the fertility collapse tracks plunging rates of partnering in the US and elsewhere in the world.

There is no reason to expect birthrates to miraculously recover when people are single at higher rates than ever before.
(Chart by @jburnmurdoch.) Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24
A recent study found that giving men a pay raise led them to have more children, while giving women a pay raise led them to have fewer children. ๐Ÿงต. Image
Image
For women, the effect of a pay raise was significantly reduced future fertility. A pay increase at 25 was associated with a large decrease in fertility at age 30, regardless of the skill level.

For men, a pay increase was associated with persistently higher fertility. 2/4 Image
Why? The authors argue that "the substitution effect between children and labor supply is dominating for women while the income effect is dominating for men."

Since childcare falls more on women, the competition between work and family is greater for women than for men. 3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
A newly published paper found pronatal policies only worked when supported by culture.

"Maternity benefits increased fertility only among women who grew up in religious families" in the Baltics.

This could explain why many pronatal policies have not boosted fertility more. ๐Ÿงต. Image
Image
In 1982, there was a big expansion in child benefits in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania including maternity leave wage benefits, a cash payment for birth and 18 months of job protection.

Five East European countries with comparable economic systems did not get the benefits. 2/5 Image
The study found, "among women who grew up in religious households, fertility went up by a statistically significant 5.7 percentage points representing a 46.3% increase."

Meanwhile, there was "no change in fertility among women who did not grow up in religious households." 3/5 Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 11
A new study finds that work-from-home raises fertility more than any conventional family policy.

"Estimated lifetime fertility is greater by 0.32 children per woman when both partners WFH one or more days per week as compared to the case where neither does." ๐Ÿงต. Image
Image
In this chart, a large effect is clearly seen, with fertility higher when either partner has some work-from-home and highest when both do.

The authors say this is not due to selection because fertility rose among those that unexpectedly got WFH, compared to those that didn't. Image
Raising the work-from-home share of either partner by seven percent raised the one-year fertility by a similar amount, which means that families that have WFH have considerably higher fertility on average. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(