Communism was always a terrible ideology but at least Communists in the '20s were serious people who wanted to industrialize and build factories in the Soviet Union instead of ridiculous dorks who thought they could feed a commune with 2 hours of low-stress hobby farming per day
Communism used to be "we need to work hard to expand our productive capacity" which just failed because central planning doesn't work and today Communism has all the problems of central planning while also attracting people who think reading Tarot cards is labor
My favorite response in the "what will your job in the commune be" thread was the guy who said something like "political commissar who beats the shit out of people who think we should feed them while they do astrology"
The anarchists in Spain also didn't think they could run a commune on tarot readings and talk therapy though
Apparently Nestle doesn't even make baby formula in the US anymore, which makes this take even more idiotic than it already was
The economic costs of women staying home instead of working would obviously be higher than the loss of baby formula sales, so the corporate element that impacts maternity leave policy is just that they just want employees to go back to work
Holy shit, what a fucking nerd. So much right-wing writing just reeks of desperation. They want to sound erudite but they are not erudite so you wind up with absurd gobbledygook that only a moron could think contains meaning
I can't stop laughing at the fact that the dude who wrote an article referring to "the feisty Faustian individualism of Floridians" expects me to believe that he's slept with more than 100 women
People with Down Syndrome have an average IQ around 50. A country could not function if the average person performed worse on IQ tests than someone with a severe intellectual disability
20% of Nigeria would have to be effectively comatose
I don't think she only appeals to women, but people who absolutely love Jane Austen are like 99% female. When I read her work, I fully understand why she's generally considered great and also I don't enjoy her books very much
Mark Twain said reading Jane Austen made him want to dig her up so he could beat her over the skull with her own shinbone so my "men often don't 'get' Jane Austen" take has some serious literary pedigree behind it
For whatever reason, Austen is the only major female author of the 1800s that makes me feel like there's something I'm missing. I really like the Bronte sisters, but that's probably because they were a bunch of weird freaks who put crazy attic-dwellers in their romance novels
It is also not clear that the rebels in V for Vendetta are better than the establishment since they have no plan to govern, V tortures Evey for like two months, and all they accomplish is blowing things up
There's a hilarious myth that traditional art is fascist-coded and radical art is inherently progressive, as if every modernist poet wasn't a massive political reactionary, with Ezra Pound being an outright Mussolini supporter who did anti-Semitic broadcasts over Italian radio
The Italian futurists were all a bunch of crypto-fascists and European surrealism was filled with fascist fellow travelers while all of the Communist art of the 1930s looked like this
There has been no relation between artistic and political radicalism throughout most of history