1./ How did this scandal happen?
How did an 8 year old girl in this clip from @libsoftiktok end up injected with a drug invented to treat prostate cancer in old men? Let me tell you how fake science turned her hospital in Boston into a Ground Zero of this medical disaster.
1/18
2. The girl was treated at the Gender Management Service (GeMS) Clinic at Boston Children's Hospital. The clinic was founded in 2007 by Norman Spack, an endocrinologist, or hormone specialist. He was on a hormone mission ever since witnessing a trial in Holland a few years before
3./ In the mid 90s doctors there began giving a small group of teens GnRH agonists or puberty blockers to "pause" puberty. Spack now advocated for this to be embraced globally. He ignored the flaws of the trial, dissected here brilliantly by Michael Biggs.
4./ There had been no animal trials, nor human trials with a control group. Success was wildly exaggerated. The first patient (B) was revealed later to be deeply depressed and suicidal. Spack seemed more struck with how the kids looked; which he describes here as ...beautiful!🤔
5./ Despite a lack of evidence to back puberty blockers Spack stated openly he was "salivating" to start using them on kids. He got the chance when he was appointed as the first head of the GeMS clinic in Boston. He could now salivate as much as he liked. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
6./ Spack didn't stop there. In 2013 he wrote the Endocrine Society's Transgender Guidelines so that they now advocated puberty blockers. It was seen as "an attitudinal shift to be able to say the Endocrine Society supports this." It was milked mercilessly endocrinenews.endocrine.org/blocking-puber…
7./ The guidelines would continually be quoted as medical gospel and feature in the Keira Bell case. Yet how carefully had they been drawn up? In a @TEDTalks lecture Spack himself admitted he breached them when treating the son of Susie Green, CEO of UK trans charity Mermaids.
8./ Spack admits he "did something a little bit innovative". Innovative? He gave cross-sex hormones to her 13 year old. He then helped arranged the boy's castration in Thailand at 16; an age illegal in the UK & US. If you're thinking this is all rather Wild West you'd be right.
9./ Spack justified this medical abuse with reference to nothing more scientific than a posed magazine cover of twin boys. He said the difference between the boy who is going through puberty and the twin he treated with blockers "says it all". Here's why it doesn't.
10./ The Cass Review confirms the vast majority of gender dysphoric kids find their dysphoria dissipates or disappears once they go through puberty. The boy on the left has had this stolen from him. Isn't there something creepy about how Spack describes his brother's puberty?
11./ My theory is that some of these lunatic doctors have convinced themselves they're saving effeminate boys from the nightmare of becoming adult men. The truth is manhood includes effeminate, sensitive men too. Boys like this also have an inalienable right to fully become men.
12./ Spack's ludicrous defence of puberty blockers was that they were the only alternative to giving cross-sex hormones. "We can't just give those to 10-12 year olds" Why not? "Because they can't possibly understand the consequences of infertility". Have you spotted the problem?
13./ 99% of kids on puberty blockers move onto cross-sex hormones thus rendering them sterile. Spack and his fellow ghouls who created this pharmaceutical Ghost Train to sterility justified it because they claimed any kid who said they were trans knew themselves absolutely.🤦♂️
14./ In his @TEDTalks Spack justifies all this by wilfully exaggerating the risks from suicide. Yet even at the time the Tavistock's Polly Carmichael was on the record saying "trans kids" are at no greater risk of suicide than kids with mental health issues such as bulimia."
15./ If there's ever a Nurnberg Trial for Gender Ghouls Spack should be arraigned. He travelled the world championing child sterilisation. In London in 2016, he led a Mermaids conference in singing 'The Times are a Changing'. They're changing back, mate. theguardian.com/society/2016/n…
16./ Spack inspired the child-abusing charity Mermaids which then advised the addled parents of poor Jaron (Jazz) Jennings. Jazz was castrated and put through surgical hell like this in a fruitless attempt to mimic being female. This is what real conversion practices look like.
17./ Every clinician at the Boston Hospital sterilising an 8 year old girl deserves to be in jail. They may have been assisted by a media and politicians who have lost their marbles. But like Spack no one forced them to prescribe the drugs. No one forced them to ruin young lives.
18./ If you want to read more about the roots of the biggest medical scandal of the 21st Century (so far) then subscribe using the link in my bio.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex.
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism.
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously?
1./ 🧵 Why did the SNP ignore the crimes of Jordan Linden who has been convicted of sex offences against young men and boys? In my latest article I dissect the culture of a party that led gay predators to believe they had a free pass.
Click on link in my bio to read.👆
1/of 7.
2./ After gay marriage was passed the SNP was so desperate to convince gay men the party was their natural home its culture changed. Soon it began to resemble that of a sleazy gay bar, complete with innuendo, boozing and misogynist drag queens performing at SNP events.
3./ After Derek Mackay was fired for harassing a 16 year old boy it was revealed Nicola Sturgeon had banned him from drinking at Conference. When drunk he tended to grope men. Shame she didn't stop him going on school visits which is how he met that 16 year old boy.