With the decline in morale in the Russian army against the backdrop of huge losses and lack of significant success, it is pushing to resort to tactics of barrier troops, blocking units, or anti-retreat forces. The history of the use of such units actually goes back to
1/20
antiquity, when formations were created that in various ways prevented soldiers from escaping from the battlefield or retreating. For Russia, this tactic is also not new at all. The history of the use of barrier troops in Russia can be traced back to the tsarist army of
2/20
Peter the Great. This practice was then used during the First World War starting in 1915. Moreover, the order did not come from above, but it was the initiative of generals such as V. Smirnov and A. Brusilov. Even while commanding the 8th Army, he issued a decree that read:
3/20
“You must have especially reliable people and machine guns at your back, so that, if necessary, you can force the faint-hearted to go forward. You should not think about the wholesale execution of entire units for trying to turn back or, even worse, surrender to the enemy.
4/20
Anyone who sees that an entire unit (a company or more) is surrendering must open fire on those surrendering and completely destroy them." By 1916-1917, the so-called "Battalions of Death" They had two functions - strike and barrier. Strike troops were supposed to lead
5/20
soldiers into battle, showing an example of courage, the barrier reinforced this courage by shooting deserters, but by the end of 1917, deserters began to gather in groups and resist. During the Russian Civil War of 1918-1922, barrier troops were used to protect food
6/20
supplies. barrier troops were deployed in cities, at railway stations, piers, and highways. The creation of barrier troops took place in conditions of crisis, devastation and hunger, especially in the industrial centers of the country. In addition to barrier and requisition
7/20
units, barrier-requisition units were rampant throughout the Russian provinces, combining the functions of the two previous ones, and in addition to preventing peasants from exporting grain from the village, they were simultaneously engaged in searches and confiscation of
8/20
grain, livestock and other resources from peasants. Trotsky began to use barrier troops in his usual function in the civil war. Chapaev also used them in his troops. All this was hidden by the Soviets and became known only after the collapse of the Union. In 1929-1933,
9/20
barrier troops were used to suppress peasant uprisings and the unauthorized flight of the peasantry from collective farms and to prevent refugees from entering big cities and industrial construction sites, where many foreign specialists worked. The Soviets tried their best
10/20
to hide information about the famine of 1932-1933 and kept the areas suffering from it under lock and key. After the Winter War with Finland of 1939-1940, the creation and use of barrier troops became an unwritten and undeclared part of Soviet military doctrine. Naturally,
11/20
the practice continued throughout the Second World War. Barrier troops were not only used by the Soviet Union. In general, all communist regimes created such units in the ranks of their armies. China, North Korea, Vietnam, even during proxy wars in Africa, as well as drug
12/20
wars in South America, the functions of barrier detachments in the armies of African and Latin American communist pro-Soviet regimes were performed by Cuban troops and Soviet military specialists. Barrier troops were deployed during the war in Georgia of 1992-1993 in the
13/20
ranks of the Russian army on the side of Abkhazia. During the war in Syria in 2014, such units were also created in the ranks of Bashar Assad’s Army. These functions, in addition to Assad’s soldiers, were performed by Wagner PMC. After the full-scale invasion of Ukraine,
14/20
Wagner continued this practice, sending prisoners into meat assaults. The death of Prigozhin put an end to Wagner, but not the barrier troops. The Storm detachments are now under the control of the Russian Ministry of Defense (I think it would be more correct to call it the
15/20
Ministry of Attack) and in order to drive crowds of prisoners forward, they continued this practice. This is a common practice among totalitarian regimes and their tactics are similar. When everything is based on fear and coercion, barrier troops will be used. Such regimes
16/20
are only able to impose their power by force. There is no need to explain to the Ukrainian soldier why he is fighting.. He protects the Motherland, Family, Loved Ones. For 2 years, Russia has not been able to come up with a clear idea that would explain to its soldiers
17/20
why they are dying. They go to Ukraine exclusively for the promised money, and when they realize where they have ended up, they can no longer escape from there. In addition to detachments, pits, torture and other methods are used. Russian society is a society of slaves.
18/20
Throughout its history, it was based on the fear of torture and punishment. This is what they bring to any country they invade. Ukraine's struggle is not only a struggle for one's country and identity. The struggle of democracy against dictatorship.
19/20
This is the fight of Freedom against slavery.
20/20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bloomberg reported, citing sources, that Greece and Malta have become the main obstacles to an EU proposal to replace the price cap on Russian oil with a ban on services necessary for transporting fuel. According to the agency’s interlocutors, the two southern European
🧵
countries raised concerns about this step at a meeting of EU ambassadors on Monday, where the latest sanctions package against Russia was presented. They warned that such a shift could affect Europe’s shipping industry and energy prices. Both countries also requested
clarifications regarding proposals to impose sanctions on foreign ports handling Russian oil and to strengthen oversight of ship sellers in order to reduce the number of vessels entering Moscow’s fleet. A representative of the Greek government declined to comment.
The most unpleasant forecasts regarding the Russian economy are beginning to materialize. What analysts cautiously spoke about a year ago is now being discussed openly even by the most pro-government Russian economists: the safety margin is rapidly shrinking. While Putin talks
🧵
about “stability” and “growth,” the reality looks far more prosaic: a country that unleashed a war of aggression against Ukraine is methodically burning through its own financial system. According to estimates by Germany’s BND intelligence service, Russia’s real military spending
reaches around 10% of GDP and nearly half of the federal budget. In fact, actual expenditures are 66% higher than officially declared, due to hidden budget lines, Defense Ministry construction projects, military IT infrastructure, and social payments to servicemen. In simple
According to BND estimates, last year Russia’s military spending may have amounted to almost half of the state budget and around 10% of the country’s GDP. According to the German intelligence service, Russia is spending significantly more on the war and its armed forces
🧵
than it has declared in recent years. Since the start of the war against Ukraine in February 2022, Russia’s defense budget has increased sharply every year. In addition, Russia’s interpretation of “defense spending” differs significantly from the NATO definition, German
intelligence officials note. A comprehensive analysis of budget data conducted by BND shows that Russia’s defense budget in recent years was 66% higher than officially reported. Unaccounted expenditures include, for example, construction projects of the Ministry of Defense,
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky explained why he sharply criticized Europe at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He made these remarks during a meeting with journalists in Kyiv, according to a correspondent from European Pravda. Zelensky said he had grounds for critical
🧵
statements toward Europe after a lack of funding led to a shortage of air defense missiles, allowing Russia to strike Kyiv’s energy infrastructure. Zelensky did not deny that his speech may have sounded overly harsh from European capitals and explained this by saying that
Ukraine and the rest of Europe live in different information spaces. He also acknowledged that the differences are not only informational but also emotional in how events are perceived. The president explained that his Davos speech was preceded by heavy strikes on energy
Putin is losing the game he himself started. His bet was placed on a return to the world of the 19th and early 20th centuries - a world of empires and spheres of influence, where Europe, America, Africa, and Asia are divided among several “superpowers.” In Putin’s vision of
1/19
the world, there were supposed to be three such powers: the United States, Russia, and China. However, the real transformation of the global order is unfolding in a completely different way. The key failure is Ukraine. At the end of the fourth year of war, Russia has still
2/19
been unable to subjugate it. The army is visibly degrading, human and technological resources are being exhausted, the economy is held together by military spending and gray schemes, and the state increasingly resembles an overextended empire losing its ability to govern
3/19
Within NATO, the possibility of conducting a special joint mission in Greenland is being considered in order to accommodate the interests of US President Donald Trump. This week, the US president once again stated that he wants Greenland. Military intervention is not being 1/8
ruled out. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen previously said that this would mean the end of the Alliance if the United States were to begin military action against her country. On Thursday morning, the 32 ambassadors of the Alliance gathered for their weekly meeting. 2/8
It took place in a "calm atmosphere." Denmark raised the Greenland issue in a "positive and forward-looking manner," NOS insiders reported. The US ambassador to NATO, Whitaker, also reportedly spoke in a conciliatory tone. As became clear during the meeting, almost all 3/8