A Guide to Countering Mis/Disinformation During a Crisis.
Amid unprecedented events, our news feeds overflow with reports, images, and videos, making real-time truth discernment challenging. This thread equips you with the tools for effective navigation amidst such situations.
When "Breaking News" emerges, the rush to lead and control the narrative ensues. Reports are hastily assembled, drawing from private sources, alleged incident images, and precedent, often intertwined with personal opinions. This process is standard, but it also leads to issues.
The hurried reporting often results in the publication of false testimonies, mislabeling unrelated pictures and videos as connected to the event, and unsourced reports driving a false narrative about the sequence of events.
How can WE avoid this?
Step 1: Be aware of your own bias.
Your belief system influences the narrative you embrace regarding "Breaking News." People often scramble to latch onto reports, pictures, or videos that align with their preconceived conclusions about the event, forgoing a critical analysis.
Step 2: Ignore reports that don't provide a source.
You are going to have to filter through a lot of content as you try to piece together what transpired. Ignore anything that doesn't provide a source for their claims about the event.
Step 3: For reports with alleged sources, check them!
Sometimes, the sources provided are "unnamed," "anonymous," or overly vague, such as when attributed statements are as generic as "a [country] official said". My advice would be to also initially ignore these alleged sources.
Step 4: For photos/videos attributed to the event - Patience.
Check for disputes regarding the origin of the photos/videos. Misattributed media is often swiftly "fact-checked." Moreover, consider using "Google Lens" on the image/video to uncover any possible older versions.
Step 5: Don't believe fact-checkers who don't provide sources.
Often, fact-checkers will rush to correct posts. Ensure that their explanations provide sources for their claims, and treat them as you would any "Breaking News" report.
Step 6: Don't rely on the captions or subtitles of videos of languages you don't speak.
If feasible, contact a user fluent in the language for verification. If not, attempt to locate a transcript of the video. Exercise caution with translation apps as they may not always be accurate.
Step 7: Sensational dazzles, yet truth it often eludes
Be cautious of initial reports packed with buzzwords and vivid details; they often serve a purpose. During a crisis, beware of clickbait designed to exploit biases and grab attention.
Navigating reports can be complex and time-consuming. This concise list aims to help you swiftly sift through your news feeds, drawing from personal experience to steer clear of fake reports, pictures, and videos.
For a more comprehensive overview of handling misinformation:
Note: A frequently asked question is, "Who should I follow for accuracy?"
We all have biases, which can lead to mistakes. Follow those you trust, but remain cautious and ensure they source anything they post. After all, we're all human and prone to errors.
Thanks for reading!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It will never cease to amuse me that the agenda or circumstances surrounding any major event will always fall directly in line with whatever core belief a “truth seeker” holds.
They begin with a conclusion, and just jerry-rig “evidence” to fit it.
Wanna test it yourself?
Go to any self-proclaimed truth seeker and figure out their core narrative: 1. Hatred of left/right wing people 2. Hatred of a religious/ethnic group. 3. Hatred of a racial group. 4. Or the recurring hits: “This is a conspiracy,” “False flag,” “It’s staged.” 5. Etc
Now, look at any major event and the time it happened.
Then look at their feed.
How long did it take them to shove the event into their narrative?
Not based on evidence. Not based on facts.
But simply because “it has to be.”
On Jan 5, 2025, @elonmusk said:
“Grok will be the best source of truth by far.”
Beyond this, users have relied on the X LLM, known as Grok to verify information, even attempting to use its replies as Community Notes.
But can we really rely on Grok?🧵
We mostly see Grok being tagged in comment sections, being asked:
“Grok, is this true?”
This tells us something really important:
People want to verify information they see on their feed.
In theory, that’s great - People aren't blindly believing posts. But there’s a big catch.
The catch?
Grok isn’t omniscient, and many also see it as “unbiased". But it’s just a machine built on human-provided, narrative-driven, and malleable data.
Its answers shift with how questions are asked and are guided by prompts set by its creators.
I've been seeing people pick & choose which phrases to show that were written on the Minneapolis shooter, depending on the narrative they are trying to formulate.
Here is a complete list of every(122) phrase written on the weapons and magazines, and their (likely) meaning:
Note:
After reviewing nearly everything I could (some words were difficult to decipher or translate from Russian*), it appears that the shooter was fascinated by what many would describe as “Internet culture”—albeit its more extreme end.
They reference various infamous mass shooters, as well as hateful slogans and violent statements targeting LGBT+ people, people of color, Jews, Muslims, political figures such as Donald Trump, Israel, and other groups.
Here is the complete list of phrases, all 122 of them:
One of the reasons I follow a wide range of accounts across the political spectrum is to gain insight into how each side views the same event, and hints that misinformation is being spread.
Take this incident that occurred outside an Egyptian government office in New York yesterday:
These 3 posts all appeared on my timeline in one continuous scroll. However, you'll notice that they cover the same exact incident differently:
"Nazi Hunters" claimed: 1. Those assaulted were "Pro-Hamas protesters". 2. The incident occurred at the Egyptian embassy in New York.
The message isn't fake, but deleted - There are 2 ways to prove this: 1. Forwarded Messages 2. Link ID
A short🧵
To Clarify: This thread is strictly about verifying a specific claim, and to help others with methods to verify the existence of deleted Telegram messages.
1. Forwarded Messages - While the message was deleted in the main channel, it wasn't in the discussions "Group".
How to find it: Go to Al-Sharifs Telegram > Click on "Leave a comment" under any post > Then "Join Group" > It'll appear in your Chats > Click on it and search "9 ساعات" > It'll show up for you - Written and forwarded by Al-Sharif to that group.
2. ID - Even without the Commentary Group, the ID numbers of the former and latter messages prove a deletion occurred:
The ID number 22098 is missing - But it does appear in the Waybackmachine archive. web.archive.org/web/2023112701…