A Guide to Countering Mis/Disinformation During a Crisis.
Amid unprecedented events, our news feeds overflow with reports, images, and videos, making real-time truth discernment challenging. This thread equips you with the tools for effective navigation amidst such situations.
When "Breaking News" emerges, the rush to lead and control the narrative ensues. Reports are hastily assembled, drawing from private sources, alleged incident images, and precedent, often intertwined with personal opinions. This process is standard, but it also leads to issues.
The hurried reporting often results in the publication of false testimonies, mislabeling unrelated pictures and videos as connected to the event, and unsourced reports driving a false narrative about the sequence of events.
How can WE avoid this?
Step 1: Be aware of your own bias.
Your belief system influences the narrative you embrace regarding "Breaking News." People often scramble to latch onto reports, pictures, or videos that align with their preconceived conclusions about the event, forgoing a critical analysis.
Step 2: Ignore reports that don't provide a source.
You are going to have to filter through a lot of content as you try to piece together what transpired. Ignore anything that doesn't provide a source for their claims about the event.
Step 3: For reports with alleged sources, check them!
Sometimes, the sources provided are "unnamed," "anonymous," or overly vague, such as when attributed statements are as generic as "a [country] official said". My advice would be to also initially ignore these alleged sources.
Step 4: For photos/videos attributed to the event - Patience.
Check for disputes regarding the origin of the photos/videos. Misattributed media is often swiftly "fact-checked." Moreover, consider using "Google Lens" on the image/video to uncover any possible older versions.
Step 5: Don't believe fact-checkers who don't provide sources.
Often, fact-checkers will rush to correct posts. Ensure that their explanations provide sources for their claims, and treat them as you would any "Breaking News" report.
Step 6: Don't rely on the captions or subtitles of videos of languages you don't speak.
If feasible, contact a user fluent in the language for verification. If not, attempt to locate a transcript of the video. Exercise caution with translation apps as they may not always be accurate.
Step 7: Sensational dazzles, yet truth it often eludes
Be cautious of initial reports packed with buzzwords and vivid details; they often serve a purpose. During a crisis, beware of clickbait designed to exploit biases and grab attention.
Navigating reports can be complex and time-consuming. This concise list aims to help you swiftly sift through your news feeds, drawing from personal experience to steer clear of fake reports, pictures, and videos.
For a more comprehensive overview of handling misinformation:
Note: A frequently asked question is, "Who should I follow for accuracy?"
We all have biases, which can lead to mistakes. Follow those you trust, but remain cautious and ensure they source anything they post. After all, we're all human and prone to errors.
Thanks for reading!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As AI technology advances, so does our skepticism toward video footage. Visual oddities that were once dismissed as typical artifacts are now increasingly seen as undeniable signs of AI fakery.
So, what raised suspicion in this case? Four main things — but one frame in particular stood out.
The key oddities observers pointed to:
1. Primary focus — the frame where the white vehicles appear to be propelled upward before the explosion.
2. The white cars in front seem to move “casually” forward.
3. The flags don’t react “as they should.”
4. The pedestrians don’t appear to “panic.”
Note: Quotation marks are used to reflect that many of these observations are entirely subjective.
A viral claim alleges that over 1,000 Israeli deaths—military and civilian - were exposed via a hack of the Israeli "Hess" website, due to Iranian strikes.
But is there any truth to it—and can we even know, given Israel’s military censorship?
A🧵
The official numbers, per Israeli/Palestinian media (TOI/Maariv/Palestine Chronicle/MOH), cite 29 deaths (28 civilians / 1 off-duty soldier) and 3,000+ injured, but the death toll could rise as there are still several in critical condition (As of June 24th).
But could they be concealing additional casualties? In theory, yes—but what evidence supports that claim? Very little.
Typically, three points are cited to support the idea: 1. Alleged leaks of Israeli deaths. 2. Aftermath videos showing destruction on a massive scale. 3. Israel’s military censorship.
“Iranian strikes” clearly means Israeli strikes on Iran — just read one sentence past the headline.
Tip: Read articles before you share them.
Another few tips: 1. If the OP doesn't provide a source for the claim they make - ignore the claim. 2. If they provide a source - verify it exists. 3. If it exists - verify it says what the OP said.
As news broke of a young child being violently slammed into the ground at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, so did speculation about the attacker’s identity.
What isn’t confirmed:
Claims that the attacker is Jewish or a Zionist have circulated online without ANY evidence. The only official reference appears in Iran’s Tasnim News Agency, where Ambassador Kazem Jalali stated: “Some have claimed the attacker is Jewish, but I cannot confirm that.”
What we know:
The perpetrator is Vladimir Vitkov, 31, a Belarusian national, returning from Egypt, where he had been working on a construction project. He was reportedly under the influence of whisky and cannabis at the time of the assault.
This is a good time to remind everyone of the Ben Cohen case - which led to an innocent man being harassed for a crime he didn't commit because people were desperate to paint a narrative that fit their agendas - trying to claim the perpetrator was either Israeli/Jewish/Illegal Immigrant/Muslim:
In a renewed attempt to claim that Soroka Hospital wasn’t directly hit—but was instead damaged by a shockwave after targeting two alleged military facilities—a new video has been released.
Just like previous “evidence,” it’s wrong: The roof of Soroka’s Surgical Ward was directly struck, and the supposed military sites are not located where the video claims.
Thread 2.0:
The Claim:
This video repeats the same narrative, but instead of a fake map, it now shows a 3d image of Soroka Hospital in Beer Sheva —while still insisting the location is in Tel Aviv.
The translated claims are: 1. “Central Command of Communications, Control and Intelligence of the Israeli Army” 2. “Central Intelligence Building – Israeli Army Operations in Tel Aviv's Gav Yam Technology Park”
This is false.
1. No military site in Be'er Sheva is named the "Central Command of Communications, Control and Intelligence" – there is the IDF Technology Campus, but it's in a completely different location. 2. The Gav Yam Technology Park is also located in a completely different place.
Here is map showcased in our previous thread, geolocation exactly where the Southern Command, C4i HQ, and Gav Yam Technology Park are: x.com/talhagin/statu…
After the blast at Soroka Hospital, Fars News claimed it was just shockwave damage from nearby military targets. This is False.
The hospital was directly hit, and the map they shared to back up their claims was completely fabricated.
An OSINT Analysis by @FakeReporter :
Be aware that this analysis uses open-source tools, including geolocation, blast triangulation and publicly available information online - Nothing said here is confidential.
The Claim:
FARS responded to reports that the hospital was directly hit by presenting a map and asserting that the hospital was not struck. According to their claim, any damage resulted from a nearby impact and was caused by the shockwave.