Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Profile picture
@FreeThinkerInc
Apr 21 β€’ 4 tweets β€’ 3 min read β€’ Read on X
🚨🚨🚨 UKRAINE BILL - REVELATION #1: The Ukraine Aid Bill funds immigration. You read that right. H.R.8035, the Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2024, will pay $481M for relocation and immigration of Ukrainians to the United States.

Worse, the provision puts the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement Robin (ORR) Dunn Marcos in charge and grants her the ability to funnel the funds back to pay for "awards previously made"...in short she can cover overspending.

Does that name ring a bell? It should...she is the one who lost 85,000 migrant children and was found "negligent" by the House Oversight Committee last year (video below). Now she will have full discretion over issuing grants and contracts with private organizations for translators, housing assistance and lawyers for Ukrainians.

So what types of grants does the ORR provide? What past "awards" could she spend this money on? Well...she runs the "unaccompanied alien children (UAC) operations", where "any UAC are apprehended by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and are subsequently transferred to the care and custody of ORR within 72 hours." πŸ€”

The ORR relocates these children "through its network of approximately 195 state-licensed children’s shelters." According to its own report, "In FY 2023, approximately 76% of all children referred were over 14 years of age, and 61% were boys...countries of origin of youth in this program were approximately as follows: Guatemala (42%); Honduras (28%); El Salvador (9%); Mexico (8%) and other (13%)."

There is nothing in the bill to prevent the funds from being spent to further resettlement of illegal aliens from our southern border.

So while you are already paying for illegal immigrants, you are now either also paying for mass resettlement of Ukranians, (at best), more resettlement of illegals unrelated to Ukraine, or complete misappropriation of funds (at worst).Image
X will not allow me to post links to the ORR website where their Fact Sheets spell out the details above. Here you go, just remove the parentheses:

(https)://www.acf.hhs.gov/orr/resources

(https)://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/orr/about_orr_fact_sheet.pdf

(https)://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/uac-program-fact-sheet.pdf
Here is testimony from Ms Marcos before Congress, where it appears her office allowed migrant children to be brought into child labor.

npr.org/2023/04/18/117…
But this is the one to watch...

hawley.senate.gov/hawley-slams-b…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FreeThinkerInc

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Profile picture
Apr 22
🚨🚨🚨 The Media Strikes Back: After finding out that simply ignoring the landmark 9-0 Supreme Court decision last Wednesday (that I broke here on X) would not keep the story from getting out, the mainstream media has now begun a blitz to discredit the decision as trivial and marginalize those who think and say otherwise.

The Supreme Court ruling in π‘€π‘’π‘™π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘€ 𝑣𝑠 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝐢𝑖𝑑𝑦 π‘œπ‘“ 𝑆𝑑 πΏπ‘œπ‘’π‘–π‘  found that Title VII discrimination cases may be brought without having to show β€œsignificant harm”. In the unanimous decision, the justices wrote:

β€œThe anti-discrimination provision…simply β€˜seeks a workplace where individuals are not discriminated against’ because of traits like race and sex. The provision thus flatly β€˜prevent[s] injury to individuals based on’ status, ibid., without distinguishing between significant and less significant harms.”

Employment law firms. legal scholars and journals have lauded the decision and published details of the ruling, along with clear and broad implications for bringing discrimination suits.

Ignoring these facts, MSN over the weekend began pushing activist disinformation stories to multiple of its media outlets, including the π‘Šπ‘Žπ‘ β„Žπ‘–π‘›π‘”π‘‘π‘œπ‘› π‘ƒπ‘œπ‘ π‘‘, 𝐴π‘₯π‘–π‘œπ‘  and πΉπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘’π‘›π‘’. Their goal: to discredit the importance of the pivotal ruling. Proclaiming β€œDEI Lives On”, Washington Post writer Julian Mark leads the charge for the Leftist media with lopsided reporting and wishful thinking.

Mr. Mark and his peers from MSN have embarked on a β€˜deny and discredit tour’, enlisting Left-wing pundits and think tanks to throw shade on the far-reaching implications of the court’s ruling, and claiming these law firms are merely β€œtowing the line”. Quoting only DEI activists in the ACLU and DEI law firm Jenner & Block, the Washington Post presents a on-sided hack job espousing its usual level of journalistic integrity:

β–ΆοΈβ€œThese scare-tactics are trying to chill employers’ commitment and investment in expanding workplace opportunity,” Ming-Qi Chu, deputy director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, said in a statement following the decision. β€œWe won’t let them.”

β–ΆοΈβ€œThis is a narrow decision, and I think for those who are watching this case closely to see how it could affect the legal landscape around DEI programs, this is not the broad decision that DEI opponents were hoping for,” said Lauren Hartz, partner at Jenner & Block and co-chair of the law firm’s DEI Protection Task Force. β€œI have no doubt they’ll look for ways to weaponize the decision in service of their agenda, but they’re not going to find a lot of ammunition.”

Ming-Qi Chu, writing for Fortune, does no better, claiming without any β€˜receipts’ that β€œThe Supreme Court has agreed on several occasions…that an employer can use race-conscious practices in hiring and promotion, like setting targets for representation in the workforce or in management, to correct the effects of past discrimination or eliminate manifest imbalances.”

Chu sleepwalks through the same stale β€œequity” arguments which have underpinned Leftist ideology and been used to justify workplace discrimination on the basis of race, gender and color for far too long, concluding that the ruling in Muldrow vs the City of St Louis will not significantly impact to DEI practices and policies. She appears not to have actually read the ruling, in which Justice Kagan states, β€œToday, we disapprove that approach.”

Despite these dubious and unsupported claims, Ms. Chu contradicts herself in the same breath by admitting, "Employment lawyers have closely watched the case because its impact is enormous: Workers with meritorious cases have too often been screened out by courts that set an arbitrarily high bar to bring suit, often requiring that employment actions be β€˜materially’ or β€˜significantly’ adverse words that are found nowhere in the text of Title VII."

Taking a page from the β€˜disinformation handbook’, these liberal activist β€˜reporters’ also attempt to marginalize and character assassinate those who disagree with their activist views.

Ms Chu labels opposing views as β€œfearmongering (that) is misguided and unjustified”. Mr Mark attempts to virtue signal by dropping Donald Trump’s name in association with those who see the ruling as significant challenge to the basis for DEI programs.

Emily Peck employs the same tactics, albeit in a subtler form, in her β€˜piece’ posted on Axios where she quotes an unnamed Bloomberg source claiming, "Anti DEI groups 'will see this as an opening' to launch new attacks on diversity programs," but then admits β€œStill, she praised the ruling overall.”

The battle lines are drawn. This is a clear lesson in what happens when a corporation (MSN) with a vested interest is permitted to control and direct media content to fit their desired narrative. Don’t buy into the lies. Rely on independent reporting. Stay vigilant, and most of all don’t let them keep you down.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ I am the Freedom Piper, and I work for you. Please follow, like and repost if you value this content.

Image
Here is the full text of the Supreme Court ruling: supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Here are links to the MSN-funded puff pieces mentioned in my post above:

Washington Post:

Fortune:

Axios: msn.com/en-us/news/us/…
msn.com/en-us/news/us/…
msn.com/en-us/news/opi…
Read 5 tweets
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Profile picture
Apr 21
🚨🚨🚨CONGRESS ROBBED US BLIND: Did you know that Ukraine aid does not go to Ukraine? That's right. 75% of that $60M was never going to go to Ukraine. Let that sink in. They turned the Congress into a sea of Ukrainian flags, insisted it was the "difference between standing on the right and wrong side of history", and even had their best actor Zelensky publicly beg for it.

...𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐚π₯π₯ 𝐭𝐑𝐞 𝐰𝐑𝐒π₯𝐞, 𝐭𝐑𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 π”π€π«πšπ’π§πž.

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, who is an ardent supporter of the bill describes the plan for the money:

"π‘‡β„Žπ‘–π‘  π‘€π‘’π‘’π‘˜π‘’π‘›π‘‘, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π»π‘œπ‘’π‘ π‘’ 𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑙 π‘£π‘œπ‘‘π‘’ π‘œπ‘› π‘Ž π‘™π‘œπ‘›π‘”-π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘š π‘Žπ‘–π‘‘ π‘π‘Žπ‘π‘˜π‘Žπ‘”π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘£π‘’π‘‘ 𝑏𝑦 π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘†π‘’π‘›π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑠 π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ $60 π‘π‘–π‘™π‘™π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘ˆπ‘˜π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘–π‘›π‘’. 𝑴𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇 π’•π’‰π’Šπ’” π’Žπ’π’π’†π’š π’˜π’Šπ’π’ π’“π’†π’Žπ’‚π’Šπ’ π’Šπ’ 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑼.𝑺., π’˜π’Šπ’•π’‰ 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒇 π’ˆπ’π’Šπ’π’ˆ π’…π’Šπ’“π’†π’„π’•π’π’š 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 π‘·π’†π’π’•π’‚π’ˆπ’π’ 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝑼.𝑺. 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆 π’„π’π’Žπ’‘π’‚π’π’Šπ’†π’”."

Additionally, the congress-dot-gov site states, "π‘†π‘π‘’π‘π‘–π‘“π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘  π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘  π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π·π‘’π‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 (𝐷𝑂𝐷), π·π‘’π‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ πΈπ‘›π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘”π‘¦ 𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘”π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘šπ‘ , π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘’π‘π‘™π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘†π‘’π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘π‘¦ π΄π‘‘π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›, π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π΄π‘‘π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ πΆβ„Žπ‘–π‘™π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘› π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ πΉπ‘Žπ‘šπ‘–π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘ , π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π·π‘’π‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘†π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘ˆ.𝑆. 𝐴𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿ πΌπ‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘›π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘Žπ‘™ π·π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘"

So this was NEVER about aid to Ukraine....it was funneling money to our own military-industrial complex: $30B to the Pentagon, and $15B to PRIVATE COMPANIES.

Congratulations, you just sent BILLIONS of your hard-earned money to Blackrock.

🀬🀬🀬🀬🀬Image
I will post a series today, linked here, going deeper into the contents of the bill and the lies. THERE IS MORE. Please get the message out and stay tuned...
Minor correction...that first line should read $60B, as it was BILLIONS. Here is the source for Eric Schmidt's quote: thehill.com/opinion/intern…
Read 12 tweets
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Freedom Piper πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Profile picture
Apr 20
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.

The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those β€œdiversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.

The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.

Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.

The same companies argue that there is β€˜good discrimination’ and β€œbad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will β€˜complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.

The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively β€˜low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer β€˜actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.

This is a big win for equality!Image
Read the decision on the Supreme Court site:
supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Here is one of the sources used to corroborate the impacts:

acecomments.mu.nu/?post=409307
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(