I am having an interesting interaction with @allangmiller1 @MemberOfTheMass about the tools used to 'find' covid, i.e., sequencing, PCR, etc.
My assertion is that a simple explanation for all of the puzzling circumstances that I've observed over the past few years...
...is that the processes associated with finding/identifying/whatever the covid virus have been somehow gamed/corrupted/whatever.
The counter to this assertion is that such a thing is difficult to even imagine given the complexity of the processes/facilities/etc.
If one just assumes that the technologies are being properly used and the covid virus is being legitimately found, then one has to deal with puzzling circumstances like the vanishing of the flu, finding covid in asymptomatic people, etc.
If one assumes a corrupted process, all of these other seeming contradictions just vanish. So it is tempting to stick with this notion, no matter how technically difficult it seems to be.
Medical doctors are favourite targets of sophisticated scammers. I have witnessed this myself. They have certain characteristics that are very useful to a scammer.
Firstly, they think they are too smart and well informed to be scammed.
Secondly, they have money.
And third, once they are scammed, they tend to stay scammed because of the first reason above.
Remember Twain's words:
It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.
This also applies to well-educated folks like scientists, professors, advanced technicians, etc.
Consider the stakes:
Billions and billions of dollars.
Almost unlimited political and bureaucratic power.
And the single element needed was a virus to terrify the world into compliance.
One way this could happen would be to create the virus and please it from the lab. This is the way that most people think it was done. But what then about the puzzling stuff like the vanishing flu?
What if what was found was a way to use highly complex apparatus and methods to yield a consistent false result?
Then the pandemic becomes a propaganda exercise fuelled by mislabeling deaths as being caused by covid, false test results all over the planet, etc.
And if the testing methods are reliably corrupted, then covid can be found anywhere whenever needed to perpetuate the pandering and its repressive control measures. Like finding covid in wastewater all over the place, etc.
And then one could use that methodology for later 'pandemics'. Like finding avian flu in milk quite recently!
Magicians thrive on this sort of thing. Set up circumstances that seem impossible to overcome, and then find a way to do so. Sometimes the seemingly impossible is...
...actually a rather simple trick!
The benefits of such a scam would be enormous. You'd have the entire body of the academy and medicine supporting the narrative!
And it is the safest method too. No need to deal with dangerous pathogens, mutating viruses, etc.
And the 'pandemic' could be switched on and off at will.
So, apart from the obvious technical difficulty to be overcome, what notion better explains everything that we have seen?
I think covid was built on two main pillars:
1. Corrupted testing 2. Normal variability in...
...seasonal illnesses being labeled as covid.
The flu didn't vanish. It manifested and was labeled as covid, validated by corrupted testing.
How? I certainly don't know. The magician(s) would have to be more clever than me, by far. But if one seemingly farfetched notion...
...makes lots of otherwise inexplicable circumstances fall into place, then it is worth considering that notion, no matter how difficult it is to figure out (especially for those targets for capture by the scam, i.e., the technical elite).
Then consider that the bulk of testing was not even PCR based, it was the so-called RAT tests. Well, my kids tested a lemon with three kits and got a false positive on one of them.
Billions of false positives on the RAT tests and a difficult but not impossible corruption of...
...the genetic testing apparatus, and you have billions of people, from the ivory towers of academia, down to the regular guy in the street, convinced that covid is everywhere.
And then you shut down the world and tighten your grip on power while billions are raked in.
I'd challenge the well studied among us to figure out how to do such a trick with sequencing/PCR/computer software/etc., and then check to see if any evidence of that can be found out there. I'd bet it is not quite as hard as first imagined. Maybe get a good magician or two...
...involved in the process. Maybe a good hypnotist like @ScottAdamsSays too.
END
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ever since 2020, a great deal of effort has been invested in trying to answer the question of what is to be done, what will be done, in response to an election that was so plainly and grossly destroyed by fraud of many sorts.
Scenarios were examined, some bland and some farfetched. Certain of those farfetched scenarios, like devolution, persist in the minds of many to this day.
While I have no idea what makes Trump so confident that MAGA will prevail in the face of obvious attempts to rig 2024,...
...and I have no idea what further attempts will be made by the deranged Democrats to throw a wrench into the works, I think we can see what is going to happen, at least in the view of SCOTUS.
There is a VERY long history of precedent with the courts and the question of...
Ever since @BarryYoungNZ , the NZ whistleblower, got the record-level data over to @stkirsch, X has blown up, at least my feed has, with massive debunkery from innumerable PhDs and MDs (yea, right) crying out that the jabs are safe and effective.
I am not going to address the technical aspects of the current debate. I will leave that to the actual statisticians, biometricians, clinicians, etc.
What I do wish to comment upon is the overall manner of the responses from the pro-jabbers and the anti-jabbers.
The anti-jabbers are pointing to two primary arguments. They are reporting anecdotal experiences and they are responding to analyses of data that is emerging from whistleblowers and official sources.
The pro-jabbers are dismissing the anecdotal stuff out of hand...
Ever since @stkirsch dropped the analyses of the NZ whistleblower's data, the pro-vaxxers have gone nuts here.
And to those supporters of the jab, I'd like to say:
I completely understand your position. You are relying on what appears to be gold-standard scientific work.
And I am one who does not trust the jabs.
I acknowledge that a lot of the stuff floating around in the anti-jab world is not to the same gold standard that the pro-jab people are citing.
But I have seen enough very odd deaths and illnesses in my immediate circles...
...to raise my personal precautionary principle in a very robust manner.
Further, there does appear to be a growing body of information, denials by pro-vaxxers notwithstanding, that aligns with my personal experience and strongly suggests the jabs are not to be trusted.
While the fevered dreams of those who fantasise that Trump is still President, CinC, etc., are demonstrably false, I'd suggest that it's true that he is in certain important ways, still in charge.
Trump has developed a long track record of forcing the hands of the deranged left.
For example, Trump forced the Democrats to undertake vast and outrageously ham-fisted election rigging.
I think that January 6th, as it played out, was forced upon the Democrats too.
I have commented before about the fact that Trump has long had his own personal...
...intelligence apparatus that operates to this day. This is in addition to the awesome intelligence resource he had access to as President.
I find it virtually impossible to imagine that Trump was unaware of the Democrat's intention to create a pretext to disrupt the...
Kash Patel recently appeared on Glenn Beck's show where he said that the USA's most important strategic assets were in the sea and in space, and that there was some sort of 'battle' going on in space. (Space Force!)
This made me think about just what the plan was as Trump left the White House in 2021.
I have suggested before that it is impossible to imagine that Trump could not foresee much of what has unfolded since his departure. I have further suggested that he must have been...
...duty-bound to respond to what he foresaw.
As a strict Constitutionalist and a law-and-order guy, Trump's response could obviously not be the sort of supra-Constitutional fantasies peddled by devo-tees or Law of War (etc.) grifters. Trump would have had to follow the law.
!f you want to destroy my sweater
Hold this thread as I walk away
Watch me unravel, I'll soon be naked
Weezer
Have you noticed how calm and stable (Very Stable Genius, VSG) Trump has been?
He had a glowering moment for his mugshot, but otherwise, he's calm, positive, and consistent.
As the degenerate deep staters and globalists are running around with their hair on fire, Trump remains the VSG.
His rallies are fun, positive and methodical. Trump repeats his taking points so that any new listeners may hear his Greatest Hits. Like The Snake (love that one).