I’ve been reflecting on this letter from Minister @GwynneMP ⬇️
The letter which says the government supports Dr Lisa Ritchie’s view that “Covid is not predominantly transmitted through the airborne route”.
I suspect there may be a little more to it than meets the eye… 🧐
/1
You see, here’s the thing:
Letters like that don’t get written in a vacuum.
Letters like that are usually drafted on behalf of Ministers by a civil servant who has expertise in the subject matter.
So I’m left wondering: who drafted it?
Who is advising Mr Gwynne?
/2
Dr Ritchie’s testimony at the Covid Inquiry has been widely criticised as her views conflicted so starkly with scientific evidence presented by independent experts like Prof Beggs.
So it seems odd that the letter is written in a way which so emphatically supports her stance.
In this video, I’ve compiled crucial evidence from expert witness Prof Clive Beggs where he confirms:
🔎 Covid is airborne
🔎 Covid is predominantly spread via airborne aerosols (not droplets)
🔎 Breathing & talking generate significant amounts of aerosols.
Here’s a little more detail from Prof Beggs’ testimony where he again confirms that the BULK of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is carried in the small airborne aerosols, NOT in the larger droplets which rapidly fall to the ground.
This is CRUCIAL for infection control purposes.
@CliveBeggs The role of those in charge of infection control in hospitals is to “translate scientific evidence […] into practical IPC guidelines”.
The scientific evidence is clear that Covid is AIRBORNE…
…so why does the IPC guidance STILL not protect against airborne transmission?
As Module 4 of the @CovidInquiryUK begins, attention turns to the Covid vaccines…
And it just happens that UKHSA’s annual accounts for 2023/24 have recently been published, revealing that a staggering £1.09 BILLION were wasted on unused vaccines during 2023/24.
🧵
For me, one of the most shocking things was in Autumn 2023, when the govt bought enough vax doses for ALL over-50s…
…but then decided to restrict eligibility, denying millions of people under the age of 65 the chance to be protected.
The Covid Inquiry module which specifically investigated the impact of Covid on healthcare systems ended just before Christmas and some very clear recommendations emerged…
WHY on earth have these not been made the absolute top priority and implemented?
For further details on the flawed chain of decisions which led to the utterly inadequate infection control guidance we have in hospitals today, please have a read of my thread below where I walk you through the key evidence which emerged from module 3 of the Covid Inquiry ⬇️
It’s a real shame that comments on this thread ⬇️ have been shut down so I’m not able to respond to the reply from @SpeechAndLangUK about the impact of lockdowns on speech & language for children born during lockdowns.
Here’s what I would have said if I’d been able to reply… 🧵
This chart neatly summarises the difference in protection between a surgical masks & N95 masks (N95 is the US standard which is broadly equivalent to the EU FFP2 standard).