Drew Holden Profile picture
Apr 24 28 tweets 16 min read Read on X
🧵THREAD🧵

Do you remember how bad the media’s “Covid lab leak” - the hypothesis that the virus came from a lab - coverage was?

I thought I did. But it was a more dramatic example of uniform media malpractice than even I remembered.

So I revisited it. Buckle in, it’s long. ⤵️
It started in Feb 2020 when @SenTomCotton suggested looking into the CCP lab studying bats near the initial cases in Wuhan.

The media were outraged. In a since-updated piece, @washingtonpost said the idea was a “conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly debunked by experts.”
Image
Image
It wasn’t just WaPo. Shortly thereafter, @nytimes trotted out a similar allegation, calling the lab leak hypothesis a “fringe theory” and a “tale” designed to inflame social media.

@CNN’s @ChrisCillizza said Cotton was “playing a dangerous game” with his suggestions.

Image
Image
Image
@USATODAY, in a since-updated fact check, said that Cotton’s claims were “false” because “overwhelming scientific evidence” said so.


Image
Image
Image
Image
A quick pause here to point something out. What the media were up in arms about wasn’t the veracity of the lab leak idea.

Just that people thought it was *plausible*. That it “may” be true, as @SenTomCotton said.

Look how close the lab is to the first cases. “May” is too much? Image
Anyway, back to the coverage. This was the dawn of what I like to call “experts say” reporting, where an outlet finds someone with credentials who agrees with them to make the point the outlet wants to make.

Here’s @NatGeo, @Forbes, @CBSNews & @washingtonpost doing that here.


Image
Image
Image
Image
There were some even more dramatic examples I want to call out.

Maybe my all time favorite is from @NPR who, with the confidence that only that station posses, claimed that the lab leak theory had been “debunked” in April 2020. Image
This @ABC headline presented without comment Image
It was really a banner time period for outlets using “fact checkers” as a political weapon with no connection to facts, as @CNN does here.

The word of the year had to be “debunked,” which many outlets seemed to believe meant “we don’t like this idea.”
Image
Image
It’s impossible to ignore how this story intersects with Trump & his admin.

Once he said he believed the lab leak idea, the press decided it must be a lie.

Some really rich headlines here from @business (really?), @VICE (remember them?), @CNN (“crushed”!) and @BusinessInsider.


Image
Image
Image
Image
It’s really the condescending tone here from @chrislhayes that gets me. Image
Apropos of absolutely nothing, I want to remind you that @NPR is funded in part by your tax dollars.

More on your tax dollars soon. Image
Just a quick aside. The press at the time purported to be very upset that Trump was using the same language that they had used a few weeks before, to describe the virus as Chinese.

Here’s @CNN.
Image
Image
Then a poll came out finding that lots of people believed the lab leak theory: about a third of Americans.

The press leapt to tar the believers as rubes & the people who convinced them as charlatans.

There’s a lot of this but a few from @CNN, @Forbes, @voxdotcom & @thehill.


Image
Image
Image
Image
One moment you may’ve forgotten: in April 2020, Trump stopped US funding to the lab in question in Wuhan.

Read: up until then, your tax dollars were paying for dubious research in an autocratic regime that maybe started a plague.

Naturally the media applauded that move, right?
Wrong. The press were incensed Trump would stop giving your tax dollars to a shady lab in China.

@CBSNews said it was “jeopardizing” a Covid cure. @nytimes did much the same. @ABC blamed the bad move on “conspiracy theories” as @VanityFair pointed to “right-wing disinformation.”


Image
Image
Image
Image
One phenomenon that really stuck with me is how the press elevated China’s claims in an effort to, I presume, stick it to Trump.

Look at how @nytimes, @CNN and @TIME put the U.S. and China on equal believability footings.

Image
Image
Image
This wasn’t a mere momentary blip. All the way until December, @AP was writing up the lab leak as a conspiracy theory that survived online “despite facts.”

Right.
Image
Image
The enormous irony of the @AP story about Covid “conspiracy theories” is the image that accompanies it.

“Wear a mask outside” the 1984-esq wall art reads. Image
The real facts aren’t as hospitable to what the media was claiming in 2020.

Further investigation into the lab leak in 2021 gave the idea a respectability even the mainstream media couldn’t ignore. They started to change their tune. Here’s @nytimes

Image
Image
Image
Then in 2023 Biden’s own Department of Energy said that the lab leak theory was the most likely explanation for Covid’s origins.

The side-by-sides of the original reporting vs the newly indisputable facts are what I see when I close my eyes at this point. @NPR
Image
Image
You probably don’t need me to spell it out for you, but you really can’t overstate the impact of the failure. When we should’ve been investigating what happened, the press had given social media platforms cover to censor the mere mention of the lab leak.

The media cheered along. Image
As a result of the media refusing to consider a politically inconvenient idea — and their need to throttle its very mention — we may never definitively know what caused a pandemic that’s killed millions and irrevocably changed the course of modern life.
And it may mean that some people get off scot-free for what they’ve done to play a role in that disaster.

Hard to imagine that wasn’t the goal all along, in my humble opinion. Image
There’s a lot more to this story than I could fit into a thread.

You can read a fuller analysis of the media failure and what it means here: open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…
Image
Reminded me of my old pinned tweet, which may be my best, from April 2020.
As @joshrogin rightly notes, I was remiss to not mention that not everyone in the media got to the story wrong. Josh was one of the real bright spots in media coverage of this episode, like this piece from April: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…



Image
Image
Image
Image
If you enjoyed this thread, I would really encourage you to subscribe to my newsletter, @holden_court.

In the coming days, I’m planning to announce more opportunities to discuss this and other reporting that I’ll be offering for free for a limited time.
open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Jun 12
🧵Thread🧵

Do you *really* remember the Hunter Biden laptop story? I fear we’ve lost the plot.

With Hunter’s name in the news I wanted to revisit the extent to which the media went to cover up corruption allegations against—and at the behest of—his father.

Follow along. ⤵️
You have to start with the scoop from @nypost and @EmmaJoNYC.

Their lede from October was damning:

“Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company.”Image
Image
Image
The story was fundamentally about Joe Biden’s alleged corruption. It was huge news, on the eve of an election.

The press leapt to claim the scoop wasn’t legit. And they reframed the issue: now it was about Hunter, not Joe. Here’s @NPR before/after
Image
Image
Read 27 tweets
May 29
Good to see the NYT’s considerable resources being put to finding the truth in a debate between private citizens that led one of them to raise a flag upside down.

Real afflict the comfortable, comfort the afflicted stuff here.
This is not, in a well ordered universe, news.

It has only become “news” because of the pivot to left wing clickbait that Trump inspired among the press.
It’s politically inspired harassment and not only is it noxious it’s driving a deep animus among its target demo that is fraying what remains of the bounds of our body politic and society more broadly.
Read 4 tweets
May 28
🧵Thread🧵

I’ve got an oldie-but-a-goodie for you from the archive of unhinged media coverage.

Do you remember how insane the coverage of Trump’s killing of Iranian Gen. Soleimani was?

I bet it’s worse than you remember. Follow along ⤵️
It all started with what I’ve gotta say might be the coldest presidential use of social media in history.

After ordering the strike that killed Iranian General Qaseem Soleimani, Trump tweeted out simply a picture of an American flag.

Many in the media went berserk. Image
First, the issue was directly with what Trump had done. Outlets claimed that he was rushing America into a war. @washingtonpost tried to point out the hypocrisy of a president who had said he would prevent a war.

All evidence suggests he did exactly that.
Image
Image
Read 25 tweets
May 23
My hottest take is that, outside of the Beltway (something, to be clear, I am not!) most Americans to the right of MSNBC simply don’t feel anything like “vertigo” about Trump. Image
I think part of why Trump is such a visceral experience for so many people who have been in DC for a long time is that these types of people (again, me included!) weren’t familiar with the idea that they could viscerally hate a politician even when he’s out of office.
I think, for lots of people, hating a politician for who they are is not a new experience, but is in fact their default setting for politicians of at least one political party — if not both.
Read 5 tweets
May 22
If you were making a parody of MSNBC, what would you do differently than what the network already produces? Image
I recognize this is an opinion piece but the decision to run an opinion piece is…a decision.
I’m imagining every on-air host at MSNBC reading this headline and starting to think this could be a Veep-like tv show.
Read 5 tweets
May 16
🧵Thread🧵

The day after my 30th birthday I was diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor.

Two years later, I’m in remission. I don’t talk much about what happened, but I wanted to write it down, both for myself, and in case it could help others.

If interested, follow along. ⤵️
This is admittedly uncomfortable for me. I’m trying to learn how to talk about the experience, because it’s obviously become a big part of my life.

If you aren’t interested in the details, I totally understand. But I want to get this story in one place.
In early 2022, I started getting headaches and dizzy spells. I thought they were just part of getting older.

But one morning I woke up and couldn’t get out of bed. My head was splitting. I started to get dizzy pretty often.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(