.@EmmanuelMacron warned today that the European Union and the European model of civilisation could “die” unless steps were taken in the next 5 years to create a European “power” which protected itself from Russian military aggression & Chinese & American protectionism. Thread 1/
In a sweeping 2h speech at Sorbonne University in Paris, Macron called inter alia for a doubled EU budget and the scrapping of Brussels' rules on competition and trade to allow Europe to defend itself from foreign domination and seize the initiative on green industries and AI 2/
He called for EU countries to build a new common European defence strategy (within Nato and not a |“European army”) and repeated his suggestion that France’s nuclear deterrent could become part of the defence of Europe 3/
The speech, billed as Sorbonne 2 after Macron’s influential speech calling for a “sovereign Europe” in the same venue 7 years ago, was mostly intended to shape a debate on the future of the EU due to start in June. But its objectives were also national and electoral 4/
Although Elysée officials insisted that it was “not a campaign speech”, Macron evidently hopes that it will change the course of a so-far disastrous campaign by his camp before European elections in June. His centrist alliance trails Marine Le Pen’s Far right by 14-15 points 5/
At the very end of his speech, Macron lambasted Europhobic politicians (like @MLP_officiel Le Pen, without naming her) who say they will remain within the EU but disobey the rules. This was, he said, “like saying we should keep the building but let it fall down” 6/
The Sorbonne 2 speech - dense & visionary, pessimistic but finally optimistic - will prob have more impact in other EU capitals than on the French electorate. Many Fr voters see EU elections as a free hit against Macron after 7yrs in power – rather than anything to do with EU 7/
The first Sorbonne speech in 2017 succesfully set the agenda for many advances in the EU in the last seven years, such as the concept of a “strategic Europe” to protect member states economically and militarily in a hostile world and the idea of common EU debt 8/
Today’s speech was, if anything , more far reaching - even apocalyptic. The European Union, and the European model of civilisation, were “mortal”, Macron said & would die unless urgent action was taken within 5 or 10y to strengthen European defences – militarily & economically 9/
“Economically, the model we have today is no longer sustainable” Macron said. The US & China had chosen to “break” international rules on free trade established 15y ago. Unless EU reacts it wd no longer be able to create jobs & wealth to sustain its prosperity & welfare state 10/
“The two biggest international powers have decided to no longer respect the rules of trade,” Macron said (referring in America’s case to the Inflation Reduction Act). “I’m stating that crudely but it’s true.” 11/
To survive, Macron said, the EU must also become a global power – “Europe Puissance” – by defending its own borders, economically and militarily and against illegal migration 12/
Macron called for a “Prosperity Pact”, including a system of European preferences, to protect strategic industries such as defence and AI. He also called for a doubling of public green, high-tech & nuclear investments to allow EU to lead the way in industries of the future 13/
To make that possible, Macron said the EU budget should be doubled and financed by new resources such as a tax on financial transactions and a “carbon duty” on imports that failed to meet EU environmental standards. Present EU competition rules should be redrawn 14/
Many of his economic proposals imply a direct confrontation with Germany (ie doubling the EU budget) but also with the United States. The proposal to create a European preference for defence procurement will ring alarm bells in Washington 15/
On EU defence policy, Macron stuck to more familiar ground. He called for talks to “establish a credible defence of the continent”, within “European pillar of Nato.” This wd not mean an EU Army but greater “strategic intimacy” between countries, such as links between Fr & UK 16/
Macron went on to repeat a previous suggestion that the French nuclear deterrent should be considered part of this new European defence structure. “Nuclear dissuasion… is an indispensable element of the defence of the European continent,” he said 17/
Macron will no doubt be criticised (in Berlin and elsewhere) for being more Franco-French than European. European defence preference would, for instance, be great news for France, the world’s third largest arms exporter 18/
Overall though the speech showed a readiness to ask the tough questions about Europe’s future which are rarely asked in other EU capitals (and certainly not in Berlin) ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
France finds itself in an uncomfortable bind in the confrontation between Israel and Iran – de facto involved on the Israeli side but having no influence on the actions of the Isaeli government 1/
France was one of three countries - with US & UK – which fired anti-missile missiles at Iranian missiles and drones as they flew towards Israel at the weekend 2/
Officially, these actions – revealed by the foreign minister @steph_sejourne on Sunday – were to protect French miliary bases in Jordan and Iraq. But France, in effect, took part in the conflict between the two states 3/
On Ukraine, @EmmanuelMacron has made a spectacular two-year journey from apparent dove to leading hawk. Why? French officials say the facts have changed and Macron has changed with them. Is that a full explanation? A VERY LONG historical thread... 1/
Since Feb 2022 the French President has evolved from would-be Putin intermediary to implacable Putin foe. From “Don’t humiliate Russia” (May/June 2022), he has shifted to “Russia must be defeated” (June 2023) & now “Don’t exclude sending western ground forces” (February 2024). 2/
The Elysée Palace insists that Macron has been consistent - in context. Here is an attempt to retrace his journey with my thoughts on how Macron’s thinking at each stage has changed and why. 3/
The French National Assembly last night overwhelmingly approved President Emmanuel Macron’s 10 year security pact with Ukraine – but lambasted his suggestion that French and other Nato troops might serve on Ukrainian soil. 1/
The lower house of the French parliament voted 372-99 to endorse a bilateral security pact with Kyiv signed last month. But Macron’s controversial boots-on-the-ground initiative (not part of the pact) was disowned by all opposition groups from far-right to far left. 2/
The debate was (intentionally) awkward for @MLP_officiel, who has a long record of pol/financial collaboration with Putin. How would she vote? In the end, the 88 Lepennist deputies abstained, saying they supported Kyiv but not parts of pact referring to Ukr joining EU/Nato. 3/
A visit by @EmmanuelMacron to Ukraine, provisionally due this week, appears to have been delayed a second time following the Russian missile attack on Odessa half a kilometre from the visiting Greek Prime Minister last Wednesday. 1/
The Macron visit was originally expected in mid-Feb but delayed until mid-March. After a telephone call last night between the French President and the Ukrainain President @ZelenskyyUa, the Elysée Palace said that Macron would go to Ukraine “in the next few weeks”. 2/
Earlier, French govt sources told La Tribune Dimanche that the Russian missile attack so close to the Greek PM had been seen by Macron’s people as “a message”. The newspaper said Paris now wanted to expand Macron’s visit to include other Nato leaders, inc possibly Rishi Sunak. 3/
Macron today produced maps of a poss Russian breakthrough towards Kyiv or Odessa which could oblige the west to act to prevent a Russian victory in Ukraine. In talks w French opposition leaders, Macron said there should be no more “red lines” on Fr involvement in the conflict 1/
.@EmmanuelMacron summoned leaders of all French parliamentary parties to talks at the Elysée Palace to explain his controversial remarks last week in which he said the deployment of western troops in Ukraine should no longer be excluded 2/
Participants in the meeting said Macron had explained his theory of “strategic ambivalence” – keeping Moscow guessing. Since Vladimir Putin clearly knew no limits, he said, the West had been handing him an advantage by fixing or “interiorising” limits of its own /3
Coming back to @ConStelz exceptional piece in @FT with a few thoughts on French side. @EmmanuelMacron NATO comments were intended as a warning to Russia & an “electro-shock” to Western countries before they stumble into a slow-motion defeat in Ukraine 1/
Senior Elysée sources say Macron’s words were calculated - and driven by a fear the West might be sleep-walking into a slow-motion defeat in Ukraine - forced by further Russian breakthoughs, a long delay in provision of US aid and a possible @realDonaldTrump victory on 5 Nov 2/
Such words were needed to 1/reassure the Ukrainians; 2/ sow doubt in Russian minds; and 3/alert public opinion to the fact that Europe faces a “tipping point” moment in the defence of democracy - comparable to the events of 1938 3/