▪️111,816 children (aged 3-17 yrs) were estimated to be suffering from Long Covid during the 4 week period ending 7 Mar 2024 (England & Scotland).
▪️Over 20,000 of these kids with Long Covid reported that their ability to undertake day-to-day activities had been limited A LOT.
Worryingly, the data suggests that the number of children with Long Covid is steadily increasing with each passing month…
…from 84k in December 2023 to over 111k in March 2024!
It’s risen by A THIRD in just 3 months.
Frustratingly, the data on duration of Long Covid symptoms is not broken down by age within the raw data, so we only have an overall aggregated view across all ages…
One thing jumps out at me from this chart is:
➡️ 30% of people with Long Covid have been suffering for LESS than a year.
In other words, these are NEW cases that have arisen since the last ONS Long Covid report in March 2023.
In fact, prevalence of Long Covid in children is now significantly higher than a year ago, in March 2023, when it was last reported.
At that time, 62,000 children were suffering from Long Covid…
… and that was UK-wide data whereas today’s new figures are for 🏴 & 🏴 only.
The aspect I’m most concerned about is the long-term damage which Covid can cause to the brain.
We now know that Covid infection can lead to a plethora of new neurological symptoms, including confusion, difficulty concentrating, memory problems, depression & anxiety.
Another useful insight from the ONS data is prevalence of various symptoms amongst children who tested positive.
The most common symptoms for those with Covid were:
▪️runny nose: 82%
▪️cough: 71%
Fever was far less common, reported in just 25% of children who tested positive.
And yet, the government’s latest attendance drive actively encourages parents to send sick children to school, unless they have a fever.
But, as the ONS data clearly shows, around 75% of children who are infectious with Covid will NOT have a fever!
And, of course, parents are told NOT to test their kids for Covid, so they’ll just send them to school with their Covid symptoms so they can merrily infect all their classmates.
I don’t blame the parents though - this is the official government guidance!
This government guidance is so irresponsible and, frankly, dangerous.
What if there’s a clinically vulnerable child (like my son) in the class?
A runny nose for one kid may mean a lengthy hospital stay for another kid.
It’s little wonder so many parents are furious about this ‘insulting’ and ‘dangerous’ attendance campaign which encourages parents to send sick children to school, as covered here in iNews by @AasmaDay.
And then there’s the fact that the Covid infections themselves can create lasting differences in some people's immune systems which leaves them more susceptible to other diseases like RSV.
This may well be part of the reason we’re seeing a rapid rise in so many other illnesses.
It’s little wonder that pupil absences due to illness remain so stubbornly high!
Since the start of this academic year:
▪️overall absence: 7%
(vs 4.9% in pre-pandemic 2018/19)
▪️illness absence: 3.7%
(vs 2.5% in 2018/19)
➡️ 53% of all absences are due to ILLNESS!
And no, this is absolutely NOT normal.
Pre-pandemic, the average illness absence rate was about 2.5%.
Across the 2022/23 academic year, the illness absence rate was 3.7%.
That’s nearly 50% higher than pre-pandemic!
…and so far this academic year, it’s STILL at 3.7%.
If the government is serious about wanting to address the school attendance crisis, then they need to be looking at ways to reduce the spread of illness in schools.
And that means telling sick kids to stay home and also improving VENTILATION & AIR FILTRATION in classrooms.
This is not a particularly new idea; it’s been discussed in scientific circles for years already.
Back in early 2023, the World Health Network (@TheWHN) published this article which summarised the latest research on Covid’s impact on the immune system.
The guidance is clear that those self-isolating at home should NOT wait for symptoms before taking precautions.
For the ENTIRE 42-day quarantine, they should:
▪️Avoid contact with other household members
▪️Remain in a separate room
▪️If contact is unavoidable, wear a respirator
🚨Clinically Vulnerable Families (@cv_cev) have issued a press release calling for the government to immediately publish the full operational & clinical arrangements for passengers & close contacts linked to the MV Hondius outbreak.
I’ve just listened to the health update from the US Nebraska Health Officials 🇺🇸
A few points of interest:
1/ in addition to the US passenger who tested positive & the one showing symptoms, it seems there is ANOTHER passenger who may have tested positive.
2/ Passengers currently in the Nebraska quarantine unit will spend a few days there being assessed.
If they remain symptom free & have support available at home to isolate safely, they’ll have the choice to complete the 42-day isolation either at home or in the quarantine unit.
3/ When asked about the US passengers who left the ship in St Helena on 24 Apr (at the same time at the Dutch woman who was symptomatic & sadly died on 26 Apr), they confirmed that these passengers have all been traced & are being monitored - but seems they’re NOT self-isolating.
Following my thread yesterday which criticised aspects of the WHO’s strategy, I’m pleased to see they’ve done a 180° turn in the updated guidance published today:
…and ALL high-risk contacts will now be required to ISOLATE in a designated facility or at home (depending on each country’s capabilities) for 42 days from last known exposure…
…and for the MV Hondius passengers & crew, the last day of exposure is the date of disembarkation.
So for the passengers & crew leaving the ship today, the clock for their 42 days in isolation starts ticking TODAY…
…and their isolation & monitoring will end on 21 June.
Following the WHO press briefing, I wanted to compile a thread with the key points.
1/ ISOLATION OF PASSENGERS
Concerningly, it seems the WHO are NOT recommending to isolate cruise ship passengers (even high-risk contacts) UNLESS they develop symptoms.
Just to quickly recap, it has been confirmed that the passengers & crew (including the 30 who disembarked on 24 April in St Helena) come from a total of 28 different countries.
The full breakdown of countries for both passengers 🟥 & crew 🟦 is detailed below ⬇️
When the 146 people remaining on the ship are repatriated to their home countries, each country will adopt their own local protocols.