But it was mastery of road construction that made Rome the most connected—and powerful—empire in the ancient world.
Roman roads were engineering marvels in their own right 🧵 (thread)
“All roads lead to Rome” is a saying everyone knows. And there’s a reason for it—Rome developed the most incredible network of interconnected highways in the ancient world.
It’s estimated there were over 50,000 miles (~80000 km) of paved roads throughout the empire.
A 4th century surveyor described the extent of the highway system:
“They reach the Wall in Britain; run along the Rhine, the Danube, and the Euphrates; and cover, as with a network, the interior provinces of the Empire.”
Built from the 4th century BC until the decline in the 5th-6th centuries AD, roads were the arteries of the empire, providing efficient means of travel for Rome’s armies, officials, civilians, and trade goods.
Roman roads were constructed so they would require minimal upkeep and provide travelers a smooth journey.
Many of them survive and are still in use today—proof they were engineered with durability in mind.
So how were they built?
Rome had 3 types of roads:
-Via terrena: a plain road of leveled earth
-Via glareata: an earthed road with a graveled surface
-Via munita: a paved road with stone and concrete surface
We’ll focus on paved roads for now.
Paved roads were required by Roman law to be a minimum of 8 feet wide where straight and twice that wide where curved.
Most major roads went beyond this and averaged 12 feet wide, allowing for two passing carts (4 feet each) without interrupting foot traffic.
To build a road, a suitable location was first decided by a civil engineer. Agrimensores (land surveyors) worked with the engineer to lay out the route.
Using rods, a straight path was prepared while a groma (a tool that helped obtain right angles) was used to plot a grid.
After the general plan was set, workers—and often legionnaires since armies commonly built roads—used plows and spades to dig the road bed down to the bedrock.
This excavation was called the fossa, or “ditch.”
The road was then constructed by filling the ditch in layer by layer. First rubble, gravel, or sand; then, once the ditch was filled within a meter of the surface, it was tamped down to create a flat surface called the pavimentum—“pavement.”
Additional layers were added on top to create a completely smooth surface. A statumen or "foundation" of flat stones set in cement would often support the final layer, which consisted of ployagonal or square paving stones.
This final layer was crowned for drainage.
When roads encountered obstacles, Romans preferred to engineer solutions rather than going around them.
Hills or mountains called for digging tunnels or cutting through stone.
Rivers were crossed by constructing bridges, or pontes, which were made of wood or stone.
Wooden bridges were supported by pilings or stone piers, but larger bridges required arches that spanned the width of the river or canyon.
Over swampy terrain, causeways were built. These were initially marked out with pilings then built up to about 5 feet above surface-level.
Concrete was an integral part of bridge and causeway construction since it was waterproof.
A mix of volcanic ash, seawater, and lime, roman concrete increased cohesion and strengthened the structure even after it had set.
Another important element of Roman road construction was the mile marker.
Appearing as early as 250 BC in the famed via Appia, mile markers were one thousand paces (~1 mile) apart, marking the distance from the “golden milestone” near the Temple of Saturn in Rome.
So all roads did indeed lead to Rome, but more specifically to this gilded monument.
On the golden milestone were listed distances to all major cities in the empire.
Rome's roads were a major reason it expanded so quickly and maintained its dominance for so long.
Well-maintained roads meant troops and resources could traverse the empire quickly—speed of travel was a huge advantage in the ancient world.
Rome was a nation of builders and conquerors that brought civilization to the far reaches of the known world.
Rome's roads facilitated this civilizing spirit.
If you enjoyed this thread and would like to join the mission of promoting western tradition, kindly repost the first post (linked below) and consider following: @thinkingwest
The design of a cathedral is theologically based and instructive in the faith. Though beautiful, its construction is not arbitrary — it wasn’t arranged simply to look pretty.
The layout, artwork, statues, and stained glass windows all serve an edifying purpose🧵
The plan of a cathedral is cruciform in shape and is usually oriented eastward—ad orientum. Worshippers face the rising sun, a daily reminder of Christ’s resurrection.
The north and south transepts or “arms” represent Christ’s right and left hands on the cross.
The entrance at the West end corresponds with His feet; one enters at the foot of the cross and proceeds upward as they approach the altar.
The layout is divided into three parts: the narthex/vestibule for catechumens, the nave for laymen, and the sanctuary for clergy.
The Holy Roman Empire lasted ~1000 years, and it looked like this:
How did such a fractured political entity last so long?
It has to do with a concept called “subsidiarity”, and it holds the key to implementing responsible government today 🧵 (thread)
Voltaire famously derided the Holy Roman Empire (HRE) as “neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire”, but what couldn't be denied was its longevity.
Existing from 800-1806, it was birthed before William the Conqueror invaded England and continued on after the American Revolution.
It’s considered one of the longest lasting empires in history, a feat of particular intrigue when one considers its central geographical location and lack of natural defensible borders.
Early Christians had a complete Bible by the 4th century—but that’s not the only thing they were reading to deepen their faith.
Here’s what books the early Church read besides the Bible🧵
1. The Didache, Anonymous, 1st cent.
The Didache is a brief discourse that contains moral and ritualistic teachings—a handbook for a Christian life.
It’s speculated the apostles wrote it, and contains the formulas for baptism and eucharist that are still used today.
2. The Shepherd of Hermas, Hermas, 2nd cent.
St. Iranaeus considered it to be canonical scripture. Though it missed the cut, it’s a fascinating work that centers around the life of a former slave who's given mystical visions and parables informing him how to live a faithful life
Historian Will Durant was not a religious man, but he believed faith was "indispensable" to a culture.
He delivered a dire warning to societies who traded faith for comfort…🧵 (thread)
Will Durant was a 20th-century American historian and philosopher most known for his 11-volume “Story of Civilization,” telling the history of both eastern and western civilizations.
His work led him to conclude that all cultures follow a predictable pattern…
Civilizations first begin with religious fervor, giving a nation strength to overcome great difficulty.
It’s their faith in a higher power that allows them to bear the initial “growth pains” that precede prosperity.
Kenneth Clark lamented that civilization was a fragile thing.
He observed three “enemies” that could topple even the mightiest cultures.
What are they, and how can we prevent them?🧵
The first enemy is fear:
“fear of war, fear of invasion, fear of plague and famine, that make it simply not worthwhile constructing things, or planting trees or even planning next year’s crops. And fear of the supernatural, which means that you daren’t question anything.”
Fear paralyzes a people and stifles adventure, invention, and grand building projects.
Machiavelli promoted a *realistic* approach to governance.
It didn’t always involve being nice.
His work "The Prince" is packed with hard hitting truths for rulers — but there’s one lesson that modern leaders MUST pay attention to, or risk losing everything…🧵
Niccolò Machiavelli was a 15-16th century Florentine diplomat, philosopher, and author who’s best known for his political masterpiece “The Prince”.
Often called the father of modern political philosophy, he wrote the book as a guide for potential rulers.
The Prince is a practical work, covering topics like: the ideal qualities of a prince; military counsel; and how a prince should manage his state.
For example, Machiavelli proposes that two institutions are integral to a ruler’s legitimacy…