🔥Breaking! The Obama admin operated GLOBALLY within the federal government during the Trump presidency! Part 1.
How you may ask? Well, through the Open Government Partnership (OGP).
Let me get into some details. Meet Nada Zohdy, she’s the one who resurrected the OGP for Joe Biden. She was also responsible for overseeing this gov org for 7 years prior to her leaving July 2022. She operated this thru the Open Government Hub.
This hub was the back scenes of radical leftist activities. 3 other orgs, at least, shared the same address as the OGP. One being the Open government hub that Nada frequented.(See part 2)
Nada is the Global director of the Obama Foundation. And she ran the Open Government Hub under Trump. Oh yeah, surprise!
This woman hates the populist right. She organized over 40 leftist civil society orgs in coordination with the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, at her beck & call during the Trump admin. The Trump Admin WAS PART OF THE RESISTANCE!
Trump let the OGP wind down, but never closed it. This was Nadas baby, then she handed it off to the Biden admin who resurrected this, & incorporated it into his Global Summit For Democracy in order to rule the world. What we are seeing today, is a global coup upon populists, which is us.
What we have here is gov led, radical leftist everything.
The Biden White House has regained control of the OGP, like when it started, but here’s some recent past history:
“OGP has bounced between a number of federal US agencies & entities, including: the National Security Council, the Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, the General Services Administration, the Office of Science & Technology Policy, the Office of American Innovation, the Office of Management & Budget, &, most recently, the State Dept.
This instability has weakened leadership for coordination between implementing agencies & made civil society interaction difficult. In addition, IRM reports have documented ambiguity about whether the OGP process exists primarily as a foreign affairs exercise or a credible domestic reform process.”
“Senior ownership of the OGP process within government, led by the White House, is vital both to enable interagency government coordination & commitments, & to signal to civil society leaders that this is a worthwhile process for them to prioritize.”
In part 2, you will see that the below authoritarians are conservatives:
“2021 & 2022 provide an opportunity, unprecedented in recent decades, to turn back the tide of authoritarianism internationally. In particular, there are a variety of regional, global, & economic meetings where good governance & rule of law are central themes. This includes the recent OECD Anti-corruption Summit, the Group of Seven meeting, a special session of the United Nations General Assembly, OGP’s 10-year anniversary summit in Seoul, &, importantly, the Biden Admin’s planned Summit for Democracy.”
And this is where we get to the Biden admin being a GLOBAL LEADER:
“The final key ingredient for an improved US OGP process is making explicit, deliberate LINKS between DOMESTIC & INTERNATIONAL policy efforts whenever possible, to the mutual benefit of domestic & global reformers. This is an important product of the transformed political context & America’s ongoing democratic crisis. Biden globalization :
Multiple interviewees clearly stated that OGP can indeed be used to assert American leadership on many issues that require global cooperation.”
Bidens globalized courts:
“Criminal Justice, Civil Justice, & Broader Access to Justice Reforms
“Many participants called for a paradigm shift that reallocates resources away from police, militarization, and mass incarceration and towards equitable justice reforms for marginalized
communities. This includes rethinking justice- related data, clemency, criminal treatment of immigrants, policing, and sentencing.
I’ll give the history of the OGP started under Obama, and source this doc. Then look forward to part 2.
Things are going to get harry later on. But in the meanwhile here’s the documentation on the resurrection of the Open Government Partnership.
It seems that Nada, the Global Network Lead of the Obama foundation, has been listed as a director of the Open Government Hub in multiple places.
So it wasn’t just for this report. It was for 7 years as of July 2022 and including the Trump admin.
But in this report, it mentions the Open Government Partnership hired her to do it.
Interestingly, The Open GovernmentPartnership and the Open Government Hub both shared the same address. 😹(See next post)
“Open Government Partnership (OGP) hired the author (Nada Zohdy) as a consultant to conduct a series of five roundtables with American civil society organizations to understand what a meaningful next U.S. OGP Action Plan with the Biden Administration would look like. The result is this report”
“Nada Zohdy is the director of the Open Gov Hub (OGH), at Global Integrity. OGH is the world’s first meeting
place and innovation hub that promotes transparency, accountability, and civic participation worldwide, by fostering resource sharing and collaboration across a network of 50 member organizations and 13 global affiliate hubs. She has been a consultant on civic engagement and democracy reform for the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Participatory Budgeting Project, and the Democracy Fund.“
Now let’s deal with that sticky subject of addresses. Government led websites that pretend not to be.
I’ve poured over web pages, and these orgs all came up. They all shared the same address at the same time.
1. Open Government Partnership.
2. Open Government Hub
3. Global Integrity
4. Open Data Enterprise
5. And we can’t forget Defending Democracy, tho I see no address listed, its ran by the Open Government Hub and Global Integrity listed above at the same address.
Looks like I forgot to include the history of the Open Government Partnership.
This global coalition operates in the domestic United States too. And I suspect this is where things started going wrong with our country. Why? Because they also work globally with leftist civil society.
2016: The OGP is steered by the US government, and is used for the domestic US too.
“OGP countries represent one-third of the world’s population and have made more than 1,000 open government reform commitments. The United States has led OGP efforts as a member of the Steering Committee since its founding and also carries out OGP efforts domestically through establishment and implementation of Open Government National Action Plans.”
June 2016, and it also shows the OGP partners with Civil Society:
“President Obama helped to launch the global Open Government Partnership with seven other countries in September 2011, with the aim of promoting transparency and innovation, empowering citizens, fighting corruption, and transforming the ways in which governments use technology and other tools to serve and engage with their citizens. The partnership has now expanded to nearly 70 governments and hundreds of civil society organizations, and participating governments have made more than 2,500 commitments to be more open and accountable to their citizens.”
🔥🔥🔥 Breaking! Trust Network Exposed! Global monitoring of our 2020 election and January 6th. Which was to protect everyone but conservatives. Linked to Protect Democracy of the Times election fortification article.
Obama is also linked to GLOBAL 2020 election and January 6 monitoring! And an actual physical presence on January 6 at the BLM Plaza which was used as headquarters to protect everyone but WHITE PEOPLE.
“In September 2020, Mediators Beyond Borders created the TRUST Network as an early warning-early response system to reduce violence around the 2020 elections and beyond.”
This was created after weekly meetings starting in August to counter authoritarianism in the USA. Where they compared our country to genocidal Rawanda.
The Southern Poverty Law Centers database, who is enveloped in scandal, was utilized. (In video)
The Trust Network included NAFCM, Ushahidi, Dc Peace, ElectionSOS and more. Obama is linked to both Ushahidi and ElectionSOS.
For example, Ushahidi worked Obamas 2012 election, and was in his Open Government Partnership and hub, utilized his admin staff, was partnered with his USAID, plus more.
ElectionSOS was born outta Hearken stationed in Obamas old campaign headquarters building along with CTCL. Tiana Epps Johnson, an Obama fellow, was in that same building and office when she created the zuckerbucks org, CTCL. CTCL, used for the 2020 election, was an Obama fellowship created org.
ElectionSOS, part of the Trust Network, was also involved in an emergency phone call of over 70 “GLOBAL peacekeepers” on Jan 6. ElectionSOS decided on what to call the Jan 6th protest which became an “insurrection” as a result.
2020 Trust Network Partners:
- Ushahidi
- DC Peace (BLM Plaza Jan 6)
- EIRUSA2020 (Ushahidi monitors for 2020 election and Jan 6)
- ElectionSOS
- ListenFirst
- NAFCM
- Bridge Alliance
- Bridging Divides Initiative
- Carter Center
- Overzero
DC Peace Team at BLM Plaza:
From Election Day to Inauguration Day, DCPT had a presence.
It was in the streets providing accompaniment to local activists and individuals at risk during the pro-Make America Great Again rallies on Nov. 14, Dec. 12, and Jan. 6, and during inauguration week on Jan. 17 and Jan. 20.
DCPT (DC PEACE) is grateful to work with local community leaders and the broader safety collective in D.C., as well as the support of Election Incident Reporting (Ushahidi) and the TRUST Network with Mediators Beyond Borders for enhancing their remote assistance and incident tracking.
Kenya Ushahidi EIRUSA and global monitoring of the USA election and Jan 6:
“The citizen-led (Ushahidi) platform, which is called EIRUSA, was launched in October (2020) amidst growing fears of voter suppression and election violence. It is run by hundreds of volunteers from AROUND THE WORLD, who take to the streets and the tweets to help.
The interesting part, is DC Peace wasn’t there to protect white people, just BIPOC and DC organizers.
“During election events, DCPT’s primary goal was to accompany and protect the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) and local organizers from D.C., through preventing violence and — when possible — interrupting dehumanization. A secondary goal was cultivating empathy, as circumstances permitted.”
The Trust Network links to the National Taskforce For Election Crisis, for post election handling. The email provided was Protect Democracy who ran the Transition Integrity Project.
Video : Details on development of the Trust Network in September 2020 along with why, and its earliest meetings prior. Was FirstNet a Freudian slip?
This supposed bipartisan org also discusses the increase of wealth by the few, inequity, climate change, and US authoritarianism with the decline of democracy.
Sources to follow.
Here’s everything you need to know about Ushahidi who is involved in the Trust Network and was involved in our 2020 election and January 6.
There’s a lot, and it’s heavily linked to Obama.
This is an explosive report. @elonmusk who there is stopping me by burying this?
DC Peace is part of the Trust Network and used Ushahidi for monitoring on January 6.
DC Peace Team
From Election Day to Inauguration Day, DCPT had a presence.
It was in the streets providing accompaniment to local activists and individuals at risk during the pro-Make America Great Again rallies on Nov. 14, Dec. 12, and Jan. 6, and during inauguration week on Jan. 17 and Jan. 20.
DCPT is grateful to work with local community leaders and the broader safety collective in D.C., as well as the support of Election Incident Reporting (Ushahidi) and the TRUST Network with Mediators Beyond Borders for enhancing their remote assistance and incident tracking.
🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Obama linked Ushahidi of Kenya created New Knowledge who was involved in Project Birmingham aka the Hamilton68 Russian bot Hoax. Ushahidi will prove to be a major factor in current and past events. We are talking the 2020 election AND January 6th too! (Those will be in another part.) And it’s gonna get a whole lot worse than just the elections!
🔹PART FOUR! Elections, Obama, Ushahidi and Big Tech. Let’s get some Ushahidi facts straight before the later exposé parts. Trust me, you’ll want to get familiar.
For starters, Barack Obama used Ushahidi for his 2012 election. And it was also used to monitor the 2016 US election from Kenya.
The now prev CEO of Ushahidi, Nat Manning, was the first ever Chief Data Officer of USAID under Obama. And Ushahidi was actually partnered with USAid too. A 2009 USAID contract for Afghanistan got them off the ground. Also involved in this Afghanistan and Ushahidi project was FrontlineSMS, Google, and the Synergy Strike Force.
The earliest seed funding donor of Ushahidi besides USAID was Obama’s favorite, Omidyar. Other donors included Soros Open Society, Rockefeller, UKAID, and Ford Fndn.
Sara J Terp, who was told by Obama to prevent the next Trump was Ushahidi also.
The weird New Knowledge founders switcharoo:
Ushahidi created New Knowledge and Jonathan Morgan and Chris Albon both of Ushahidi and its crisis.net were the ORIGINAL Popily (New Knowledge) Founders. Then later yet, Vidya Spandana, was ADDED as a founder. Then much later yet, the founders were totally adjusted removing Chris Albon and Vidya Spandana. This is when Ryan Fox showed up.
Essentially New Knowledge was initially created by Ushahidi using Ushahidi people.
Interestingly, Chris Albon previously worked at FrontlineSMS. And after Ushahidi, he moved on to become a director at Wikimedia.
Also remember that New Knowledge aka Popily were paid as a contractor by Daniel Jones along with Bean LLC aka Fusion GPS etc.
Ushahidi also belonged to Obamas State Departments Open Government Hub (OGH). Where the director of the Rhize Color Revolution org, Nada Zohdy, was a director. She was also the global network lead of the Obama Foundation. Both Rhize and a founder of the Serbian Otpor color revolution met at the State Dept OGH during Trumps presidency.
Also a member of the OGH was FrontlineSMS from Ushahidi’s Afghanistan days.
Erin Mazursky, who ran the Rhize color revolution org, was a USAID Youth Advisor, was an Obama field organizer, and belonged to the Ushahidi message board. There, she admitted to working with George Soros Open Society and the Atlantic Council.
Only weeks after the 2016 election, Erin suggested running a color revolution on Trump.
Also recall that Renee Diresta and Jonathan Morgan (DARPA) of New Knowledge both worked for the Obama Whitehouse and met during a Obama White House high level tech meeting at Silicon Valley. Renee later went on to help the Trump resistance including Indivisible in its earliest days. While using an international tech force.
• The first of the high level tech meetings on Jan 8, 2016 involved:
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Lisa Monaco (counterterrorism adviser coordinating the effort). Additional participants included White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.
• February 2016: Follow-on engagements. DiResta and Morgan personally first meet during/around these White House/tech sessions on extremist content and social-media manipulation (per DiResta’s 2017 NYT interview).
For the 2016 election, Ushahidi partnered with Georgetown University and the Election Protection Committee, who run 866-Our-Vote.
Post 2016 election, Ushahidi worked with Shaun King, professors at MIT and Harvard, Crisis Mappers, and a number of other organizations to gather reports of hate crimes across the USA.
Sources to follow, and see you for parts 5 and 6!
Ushahidi started Popily aka New Knowledge. Here’s two pieces of evidence.
“Ushahidi and its staff has incubated and spun out non-profits such as the iHub, and the Standby Volunteer Task Force, and for-profit entities such as BRCK and New Knowledge.”
Folks, stay with me! I’ve been working hard! I just linked Obama to the 2020 election and January 6th.
The same goes for the state dept linked orgs data republican has been talking about.
I’m gonna push this out before my censorship work.
Whew! I’m really digging in here folks.
There were lots of activists monitoring Jan 6th in DC. On site and electronically.
Global too.
Some of my related Jan 6 work on the Backfire method was deleted from X.
Ever hear of the Backfire method? It’s when they egg other folks on at a riot.
“Be ready to harness "backfire" as a movement.
- using government repression, non-state violence and other outsized control vs demonstrators to move those watching to engage on our behalf, and to mobilize the observers against the authorities and turn sympathies towards democracy defenders.”
🔥🔥🔥Massively Huge! Rodney Joffe, from the Trump Russia Alfa Bank scandal, served under the entire first Trump administration! So this also means that he worked under DHS CISA during the 2020 election!
*This is a do over because of new information.
It appears that I have documents for all of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020 showing that Rodney Joffe served on the Presidents National Security Telecommunications
Advisory Committee (NSTAC). Which is under DHS CISA.
Good lord, how did this happen? This is just totally unbelievable!
Anywho, I’ll be posting every single years docs, going backwards.
🔥🔥🔥Holy Cow! John Brennan is linked to global disinfo and anti conservative orgs! You see, the Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) that John Brennan and two other ex CIA belonged to was involved in the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) thru the Global Disinformation Lab (GDIL). It’s also affiliated with the illiberalism Studies Program.
Plus, I have a massive surprise at the end!
Remember the Texas National Security Network? It’s the entire University Of Texas state wide campus’s and its orgs. They all work together interchangeably.
Part of this Network is the LBJ School of Public Affairs. LBJ is where ex CIA John Brennan, Paul Pope, and Stephen Slick run the Intelligence Studies Program.
Both Global Disinformation Lab cofounders (Ryan Williams and Kiril Avramov) are from LBJ.
Ryan Williams headed up the Global Disinformation Labs Project Evergreen. Where they used a Policy Research Project team from the LBJ School of Public Affairs to write a database of global policy responses to disinformation.
Brennan, Pope, and Slicks Intelligence Studies Project is at LJB and often sponsored events for the Global Disinformation Lab. Just one big happy family.
The Global Disinformation Lab proclaimed an outright partnership with the Global Disinformation Index. And also worked with each other on a Disinformation Risk Assessment.
Here are the Global Disinformation Labs affiliates.
-illiberalism Studies Program
-Intelligence Studies Project
-Strauss center
-Clements center
-Center for European Studies university Texas Austin
-Center for Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (CREEES)
* Intelligence Studies Project is ran By Strauss and Clements at LBJ.
Biden’s State department worked with them too. Liz Allen the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public was their go to.
“Really appreciate US Dept of States efforts in working to understand and countering mis- and disinformation. Looking forward to jointly collaborating on these efforts!”
♦️The Illiberalism Studies Program:
“Addresses questions related to democratic backlash, the spread of authoritarianism, post-liberalism, the far right, populism and nationalism.”
“Adherents of illiberalism argue that, in the face of a liberalism that has “gone too far,” it is time to reassert the rights of the collective, or of an alleged silent majority, by restoring national sovereignty in various spheres: politically, by rejecting supranational and multilateral institutions in favor of the nation-state and preferring a strong leader.”
Plus I have a 110 page report where they compare republican Christians to Russians:
“Marlene Laruelle explores the parallel between US Christian nationalism and the Russian case of a blending of the Russian Orthodox Church with the political language of the Putin regime.
♦️Now the Global Disinformation Lab works on more than disinfo.
They work with the Army Cyber Institute of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point to the tune of $250,000. This also involves Threatcasting which I have previously discussed during my CTI League files exposé. I don’t trust this disinfo lab in this arena.
They also run Project Tearline, where the military even gave it its own website. Tearline.mil
♦️ Now for even more big news! John Brennan was involved in a US Election LBJ Policy Research Project headed by Stephan Slick.
This also involved Chris Krebs, Michael Daniel, Nick Rasmussen, & more.
I have this below mentioned 243 page report and Brennan talks Russiagate outta the wazoo. I think a lot of X folks in the Spygate corner would be extremely interested in this.
“Working in collaboration with Nicholas Rasmussen, an Intelligence Studies Project Senior Fellow who serves as the director of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, Slick & his students will draft a final report to counterparts at Office of the DNI that includes recommendations to defend against future attempts to influence elections.
Sources to follow!
Let’s begin with sourcing the affiliates to the University Of Texas - Austin’s Global Disinformation Lab ( GDIL).
-illiberalism Studies Program
-Intelligence Studies Project
-Strauss center
-Clements center
-Center for European Studies university Texas Austin
-Center for Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (CREEES)
Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) is at LBJ, and is ran by Strauss and Clements.
If you look under the referenced thread in my top post, you will find sourcing for Brennan, Pope, and Slick being at ISP. And for Strauss and Clements running it.
Next, lemme provide a few pieces of evidence on the Global Disinformation Lab (GDIL) being partnered with the Global Disinformation Index (GDI).
♦️ Contract between GDIL and GDI
a. Compilation of media list and associated contact information for domain outreach, to the reasonable satisfaction of GDI.
b. Development of a keyword list which meets GDI’s reasonable standards in capturing adversarial
narratives in the United States of America.
c. Cleaning and anonymisation of all content for media domain review.
d. Review of at least 70 domains based on methodology and providing all relevant data entry for the
operations and content reviews, including all quantitative scores and qualitative notes for each domain that has been reviewed.
e. A summary of the key findings and trends for the media market in English (not to exceed 30 pages).
f. Organisation of an event and co-production of associated collateral activities for the public launch of the study.