Book excerpt 🧵on the Islamisation of the Javanese, the de-facto ruling race of Indonesia & nearly half its population. Over the 20thC Java went from a fundamentally pagan/Vedic society Muslim in name only, to an Islamic one now rapidly jetissoning its old culture & way of life.
Indonesia remains near-invisible globally as a country that's just competent enough to have stable government & avoid wars, but far too poor to project power/culture abroad. However, as E. Asian birthrates collapse & demand labour, this will change.
So its Islamisation matters.
Indonesia is of course, one the world's most artificial states. Even its national "Indonesian" language is the mothertongue of almost no-one, being a creole form of Malay, growing massively after promotion as a Lingua Franca under the Dutch. This unintentionally spread Islam:
This was because the Malays were by far the most Islamicised culture of SE Asia on European arrival. Malay had even adopted the clunky Arabic script, whilst Java & others continued using their native Vedic syllabaries.
Portuguese & Dutch took over the Malay Sultanate first.
Outside Malaya, Islam only had a fragile foothold amongst elites. Islam came to the Archipelago barely a century before Europeans.
In fact, the last Hindu empire of Java, Majapahit, fell to Muslim Demak's invasion in 1527, whilst the Portuguese had a nearby base in Malacca.
Neither the Portuguese or Dutch were much interested in spreading Christianity or conquest in Indonesia for centuries, content with holding coastal forts.
Meanwhile their trade dominance & adoption of Malay displaced Javanese, whilst spreading a language equated with Islam.
Even by the 1930s, on the eve of WW2 & Independence, these Islamic conversions remained extremely superficial. The vast peasant majority of Java's population remained Pagan in practice- "Abangan". This intensified class conflict with the pious Muslim bourgeoisie -"Putihan/Santri"
Finally there was the Westernising Javanese aristocracy, the "Priyayi". Like the Abangan peasants, their Islam was mostly nominal, but for different reasons. Dutch scholarship had revived their pride in Java's pre-Islamic heritage.
Some Javanese aristocrats even saw Java's embrace of Islam as a "Civilisational Mistake". Works were written mocking & ridiculing Mohamed, mixing European literary & native folk traditions.
One prophesised a mass-conversion to ✝️, auguring a rebirth of the Javanese people.
Combined pressures on Javanese Islam from both the upper & lower classes led to a fierce counter-reaction.
The most successful were the Wahhabi-like "Modernists", who sought to 'purify' local Islam, reject traditional Kyai preachers, & instead rely solely on the Quran.
The new Islamic political parties were in turn opposed by the Indonesian Communists. Representing the syncretist "Abangan", the Communists often incorporated anti-clerical & indigenous folk motifs into their propaganda.
Whilst hating each other, both groups opposed Dutch rule.
WW2 & Japan's conquest of the East Indies suddenly wiped out both the Dutch & the pro-Western "Priyayi" aristocracy from Javanese society.
Islamist "Santri" then took their place as the leading collaborators, the Japanese using Kyai preachers for mobilisation & propaganda.
Meanwhile, with the Dutch & Javanese aristocracy both gone, the Indonesian Communists were left as the Islamists' sole opponents.
The Japanese in Indonesia were bypassed by the Allies during WW2, holding it at the war's end. Dutch lost all prestige & soon lost control postwar.
Indonesia gained independence in the midst of countrywide communal violence between Islamists & Communists (PKI).
Order was imposed with difficulty by the (mostly Japanese-trained) Indonesian Army, with the PNI as its political party.
Separatists in Ambon were also crushed.
The military handed power over to a liberal parliamentary government, but hatreds between Santri Islamists & Abangan only continued to worsen. Between the Islamic parties & the Communists, the establishment PNI had little organic base, increasingly relying on Communist support.
As Sukarno's fragile PNI government worked more & more closely with the anti-clerical Communist PKI, the Abangan masses began abandoning Islam explicitly.
Foreigners observed the de-Islamisation of both cities & countryside, whilst a minority became increasingly strict Muslims.
Formerly neutral signifiers of personal faith became sectarian class markers, such as the headscarf. During the 50s, the Abangan abandoned it as its use became associated with hardline Islamists.
A few parties went beyond even the PKI, such as Permai, which was openly pagan.
Nonetheless, the peasant constituencies of Marxist Permai & PKI still felt they were entitled to a traditional Islamic funeral. Refusal of clerics to perform rites led to riots.
An local elder grumbled: "You can't even die anymore but what is becomes is a political problem".
Typical election chaos of the 50s period. Though PNI as a whole hated the Communists, Sukarno himself courted them for support as an independent.
Communist mockery of both Muslim passivity & prayer positions in phrase translating as "Those Who hold their Palms out for Rain".
PKI's adoption of the Civilisational anti-Islamic rhetoric of 19thC Javanese aristocrats, mentioned earlier in this thread.
Alongside this, the PKI also used traditional theatre for its propaganda, ridiculing pious Muslims with crude & often obscene humour.
By the mid 60s, Sukarno & even PKI's leaders, realising religious-secular tensions were on the verge of provoking civil war, attempted to moderate the PKI's anti-Islamic rhetoric.
But grassroots momentum had taken a life of its own, with plays entitled "The Death of Allah", etc.
In 1965, as Indonesia was experiencing mounting multiple domestic & international crises, Sukarno, under the strain of pressure, vomited & fainted in public.
The Communists, seeing their chance, attempted a coup, which miserably failed. Their many enemies now smelled blood.
Muslim hatred & fear of the Abangan masses of Java abandoning Islam in droves was the main motivation for the 1965 massacres, which killed bwtn 500K-2mil people. Had events transpired differently, Indonesia might not be any more Islamic today than Kazakhstan, Turkey or Albania.
This was Indonesia's Islamisation turning-point, which in the 2000s took an irreversible trajectory. But even after 1965, it wasn't inevitable.
In fact, during the late 60s/early 70s, the massacres produced a massive backlash, including even mass-Christian conversions. End PT1🧵/
Pt. 2 of Stove's review of Jaynes' theory of the Bicameral Mind. Very trenchant point on the total absence of intellectual reasoning in how people arrive at religious belief. Yet "they spring up spontaneously, with irresistible force, almost everywhere in the soil of humanity".
Stove's commendation of Jaynes' theory of religion tracing its origins to auditory hallucinations, combining both immediacy & delusiveness. Unlike nearly all other senses, hearing is "peculiarly mandatory". Well, there's also smell.. but let's not go there.
The absolute *crucialness* of hearing to communicate *any* order, prior to the spread of mass-literacy. Are preliterate sign-languages capable of complex messaging?
Moreoever, organised religion was the *overwhelming* medium of social control amongst all early Civilisations.
Thread w/excerpts reviewing one of my favourite non-fiction books ever, J. Jayne's "Origins of Consciousness.." by David Stove. Jaynes posited that human consciousness & internal monologue developed within *historical times*, evolving from involuntarily hallucinated voices.🧵
The reviewer D. Stove, was a tenured Philosophy professor at Sydney uni. He was often characterised as a Logical Positivist, a label he rejected, mainly due to his own deep pessimism on mankind's ability to think rationally. We'll see this informs his own fascination with Jaynes.
Stove introduces his review puzzling over one of the deepest mysteries of the human condition: the omnipresence of religion across nearly of recorded history, barring a few brief exceptions.
A staunch atheist himself, he finds rational explanations of religion exceedingly weak.
Thread on how ex-Yugoslavia & the Balkans emerged in the 90s as world leaders in cigarette smuggling, arms trafficking & hub for the international drug trade.
There were endemic factors, but as usual the US greatly exacerbated the problem. Excerpts from M. Glenny's "McMafia". 🧵
Preliminaries. In the aftermath of the collapse of Communism, each state's underworld earned reputations for unique aptitudes in varying criminal specialties. For Bulgaria & Albania it was car-theft. Yugoslavia it was arms & cigarettes. Ukraine & Moldova, human trafficking. Etc.
Glenny uses Montenegro as an introduction to the topic of smuggling. A newly independent & tiny Balkan nation with a primitive economy, whose people were popularly distinguished from Serbians only for being famously lazy. Its leader was an ex Basketball player. Not a great start.
Another Scandinavia thread, this time excerpting Stoddard, a once world-famous American author.
Writing (1924) on Europe during its unstable interwar period. Stoddard was deeply pessimistic over Europe's future, but he saw Scandinavia's recent history as a source of hope.🧵
Nordic successes of the early 20th Century were & are virtually invisible to a casual reader of the news cycle.
Between Colonial Crises abroad, Balkan Wars, WW1 & the Russian Revolution, Scandinavia's quiet solving of some potentially very serious problems had gone unnoticed.
Stoddard emphasises that Scandinavia recently (as of the 1920s) weathered several crises, but as we'll see, most non-Nordics have never heard of them, precisely because they avoided "making a mess of things" as even Great Powers such as Germany, Britain or the US had done.
Thread w/excerpts from Toynbee's 'The Abortive Scandinavian Civilisation'.
Specifically, his thesis that the Norse, in the aftermath of Rome's fall & the Germanic migrations, had developed an embryonic Civilisation all of their own -which was snuffed out by Christianity.🧵
This chapter is presented both as a sequel & comparison to Toynbee's "The Abortive Far-Western Christian Civilisation". For a time, Ireland culturally bloomed under its own independent Church, which even proselytised in direct competition against an infant Roman Catholicism.
Compared to the earlier struggle of the Celtic Church against Romanism, which was purely for "hearts & mind", the Pagan Vikings had no qualms over openly warring against such an alien civilisation.
In light of a 𝕏 personality interviewing the ex-CEO of Blackwater, thought I'd get up a thread on the topic of soldiers for hire.
Specifically, the fate of the Greek mercenaries who fought with the Persians against Macedon. Excerpts from Badian's seminal article 'Harpalus'.🧵
The late Persian Empire had hired ever-growing numbers of Greek mercs, mainly to supress internal revolts. Although the degree to which the Persians were dependent on them is now thought to be exaggerated, the total in Persian service was nonetheless enormous by Alexander's time.
Alexander's initial policy towards Greeks in Persian hire sought to set a public example by enslavement to Macedon, perhaps to work their silvermines. He then realised his mistake, when these mercenaries, with nothing to lose, fought to the last man at Hallicarnasos & elsewhere.