I disagree that you dress like Cary Grant. In this thread, I will list some of the ways in which your dress differs and why such important details matter. 🧵
On Twitter and elsewhere, I often notice that people collapse men's style into very broad forms. A suit is just a suit, and pants are just pants. But in fact, tiny differences make a huge impact, and more attention should be paid to silhouette, shape, and detailing.
Let's start with the basics.
A collar gap can appear if your jacket's shoulders don't match the slope of your natural shoulders. Or if the jacket isn't cut right for your posture. Or the jacket is too tight across the chest (the most likely reason for Tristan's collar gap)
You'll notice that Grant's collar always hugs his neck, even when he dances. See this scene from the 1958 film Indiscreet. One reason you want your collar to hug your neck is that the jacket is not only more comfy but will look more natural on you.
The tightness of Tristan's clothes creates other problems. Here we see divots along the sleevehead, pulling at the waist, and trousers that cling to his calves, causing ripples to go down his legs.
No such issues for Cary Grant. His clothes always hang beautifully and smoothly while still giving a distinctive, flattering silhouette.
Tristan also wears low-rise trousers. As a result, his shirt often peeks out from beneath his coat's buttoning point when his coat is fastened, ruining the elegant line and harmonious look that a suit should create. No such issue for Grant because his trousers sit higher.
This is also something Grant sticks with when he's not wearing a jacket. The result is a silhouette that shifts and moves. IMO, it's more elegant.
In fact, going back to an earlier thread where I said people appreciate "shape and drape" even when they don't know it, I think what people like about this outfit (referenced in the original tweet) is how it has shape and drape. The outfit moves.
You can see here that Tristan's overcoat is not as long, so it can't move in the same way. The trousers are also much slimmer than what Grant is wearing in the second photo.
Some of Tristan's suits exhibit a technical tailoring problem. In tailoring, the term "balance" refers to how a coat hangs from the shoulders. There are four dimensions to balance: front-back balance, left-right balance, straightening, and crookening.
Straightening and crookening refer to a technical tailoring issue that's too complicated to discuss here. However, left-right balance refers to how the jacket's hem should hang evenly across the left and right sides when seen from the front. This is correct:
Similarly, front-back balance refers to how the jacket hangs across the front and back when the coat is seen from the side. The front can be lower or level with the back, but it should never be higher. Tristan's coats are sometimes higher at the front because he has a big chest.
Compare this to Grant. His jackets always hang perfectly from the shoulders, creating a balanced hem.
If you have a short front balance, the coat will look like it's riding up on you. This can give you the appearance of a beer gut.
That's why it's ironic that Tristan's style advice is "achieve this body shape." This is not style advice; this is fitness advice
He's also incorrect that King Charles uses his tailor, Huntsman. Charles has never used Huntsman. He has used Kent & Haste, A&S, and Malcolm Plews
Tight, short clothes with heavily pegged trousers actually end up emphasizing your hips, making you look heavier in that area. Tristan has a more muscular figure than Grant, but his silhouette here is wider across the hips.
Historically, the Plantonic male figure in classic Western aesthetics is represented as having shoulders broader than the hips, while the female figure is the reverse (not saying you have to conform to these molds, but this is how they're represented in the arts).
Widening the leg below the knee would help de-emphasize the hips, giving you that Statue of David silhouette. This is something Cary Grant understood.
The central thing about Cary Grant's style is that he always looked elegant, even in To Catch a Thief (1955), where he wore a long-sleeve striped shirt, wide pants, loafers, and a neckerchief.
Comfort is central to elegance because you can not look elegant if you are uncomfortable. Tristan puts darts on everything—even the front of his shirts—because he wants to show off his figure. That's fine if that's your aesthetic, but it's not dressing like Grant.
The last thing I want to note, which I've noted in other threads, is that fitness is different from style. It's fine to be into fitness. But it's not true that you have to be a certain body shape to be stylish or dress well.
You also don't have to wear tailoring. My friend @DavidLaneDesign, who posts under the name bigfits1 on Instagram, is super stylish because he knows how to dress for his body type and how to use clothes as social language. There are lots of great casual looks on his Instagram
IMO, Tristan—and many of the people who follow him—associate style too much with having a certain body type (muscular), living a certain lifestyle, driving fast cars, and having a lot of wealth.
I think style is more about knowledge and developing your eye. My friend Tim thrifts most of his clothes or shops from affordable brands like Spier & Mackay. The blazer and grey trousers you see here were things his mom bought from Ralph Lauren when he was 16
IG thefoxtooth
Grant had a level of style few will ever reach. But I think Tim and David get closer to it—despite not following Tristan's style advice—because they employ certain ideas. Meanwhile, Tristan lacks Grant's elegance because he doesn't pay enough attention to the details.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me make the case for why the NHL should abolish its dress code, which currently requires players to wear a suit and tie while heading to and from games. 🧵
The arguments I've seen for the dress code fall into one of two categories: players look better in a coat-and-tie (some use descriptions such as "classy"). Others say that requiring players to dress in this way shows respect for the game. I will address each argument in turn.
It's true that tailoring once played a larger role in sports. Basketball coaches, for instance, used to wear tailored jackets pretty regularly, even at games. Some even looked quite good in these outfits.
It's true that progressives valorize "ugliness." But I think this person doesn't interrogate this position enough and thus lands at the wrong conclusion.
Let me give you a new perspective on ugliness. 🧵
In popular discourse, the world was once good, people were virtuous, and all things were beautiful. Then modernity came along and destroyed everything. In this view, beauty is an objective standard that has been corrupted by liberalism.
I contend that beauty in personal appearance is subjective, not objective. In fact, its standards rest on the shifting tectonic plates of politics, economics, and technology. Let me give you examples.
Today, we think of these photos as the standard for male beauty and dress:
Earlier this week, I asked which tie knot you think looks better. Of course, you can wear whichever you like. But here's the social history behind both knots and why some people consider one better than the other. 🧵
In the mid-19th century, as ready-to-wear tailoring started to take form, people got around in horse-drawn carriages. After all, the car had not yet been invented. During this time, some formed driving clubs, where they rode drags.
Check out the text in this lithograph:
The term "drag" refers to the carriage you see above, which was a sporting vehicle that was lighter than the more robust stagecoach. Men in driving clubs raced drags. Hence the term "drag race" first appearing in an 1863 issue of Racing Times.
People keep asking me to do a thread breaking down why these suits don't look great. I gather that these are famous, very well accomplished F1 drivers (I don't know these people). Since I only talk about famous people, I will do a thread. 🧵
Please note nothing in this thread is meant to diminish the men in these clothes. If anything, it's the people who dressed them that failed them. I am only talking about the clothes. Hopefully, by pointing out these issues, you will learn something for when you're shopping.
A pinstripe suit with a white business shirt cries out for tie. If you don't want to wear a tie, then you need a more casual shirt or a more casual suit. Additionally, the shoes are too chunky for this outfit.
The US Army celebrated its 250th year today with a massive parade in Washington, DC. It appears @ComfortablySmug believes that this is an appropriate tie for the occasion.
It's once again worth reminding that men's dress used to be governed by time, place, and occasion (TPO). If you were of a certain social station and had to do a certain thing, you were expected to wear a certain outfit.
This tradition can be seen in men's neckwear.
In Britain, where we derive most of our traditions for classic men's dress, the term "regimental stripe" refers to neckwear with diagonal lines, like you see below. These were not purely about decoration. Each design symbolized belonging to some organization.