I disagree that you dress like Cary Grant. In this thread, I will list some of the ways in which your dress differs and why such important details matter. 🧵
On Twitter and elsewhere, I often notice that people collapse men's style into very broad forms. A suit is just a suit, and pants are just pants. But in fact, tiny differences make a huge impact, and more attention should be paid to silhouette, shape, and detailing.
Let's start with the basics.
A collar gap can appear if your jacket's shoulders don't match the slope of your natural shoulders. Or if the jacket isn't cut right for your posture. Or the jacket is too tight across the chest (the most likely reason for Tristan's collar gap)
You'll notice that Grant's collar always hugs his neck, even when he dances. See this scene from the 1958 film Indiscreet. One reason you want your collar to hug your neck is that the jacket is not only more comfy but will look more natural on you.
The tightness of Tristan's clothes creates other problems. Here we see divots along the sleevehead, pulling at the waist, and trousers that cling to his calves, causing ripples to go down his legs.
No such issues for Cary Grant. His clothes always hang beautifully and smoothly while still giving a distinctive, flattering silhouette.
Tristan also wears low-rise trousers. As a result, his shirt often peeks out from beneath his coat's buttoning point when his coat is fastened, ruining the elegant line and harmonious look that a suit should create. No such issue for Grant because his trousers sit higher.
This is also something Grant sticks with when he's not wearing a jacket. The result is a silhouette that shifts and moves. IMO, it's more elegant.
In fact, going back to an earlier thread where I said people appreciate "shape and drape" even when they don't know it, I think what people like about this outfit (referenced in the original tweet) is how it has shape and drape. The outfit moves.
You can see here that Tristan's overcoat is not as long, so it can't move in the same way. The trousers are also much slimmer than what Grant is wearing in the second photo.
Some of Tristan's suits exhibit a technical tailoring problem. In tailoring, the term "balance" refers to how a coat hangs from the shoulders. There are four dimensions to balance: front-back balance, left-right balance, straightening, and crookening.
Straightening and crookening refer to a technical tailoring issue that's too complicated to discuss here. However, left-right balance refers to how the jacket's hem should hang evenly across the left and right sides when seen from the front. This is correct:
Similarly, front-back balance refers to how the jacket hangs across the front and back when the coat is seen from the side. The front can be lower or level with the back, but it should never be higher. Tristan's coats are sometimes higher at the front because he has a big chest.
Compare this to Grant. His jackets always hang perfectly from the shoulders, creating a balanced hem.
If you have a short front balance, the coat will look like it's riding up on you. This can give you the appearance of a beer gut.
That's why it's ironic that Tristan's style advice is "achieve this body shape." This is not style advice; this is fitness advice
He's also incorrect that King Charles uses his tailor, Huntsman. Charles has never used Huntsman. He has used Kent & Haste, A&S, and Malcolm Plews
Tight, short clothes with heavily pegged trousers actually end up emphasizing your hips, making you look heavier in that area. Tristan has a more muscular figure than Grant, but his silhouette here is wider across the hips.
Historically, the Plantonic male figure in classic Western aesthetics is represented as having shoulders broader than the hips, while the female figure is the reverse (not saying you have to conform to these molds, but this is how they're represented in the arts).
Widening the leg below the knee would help de-emphasize the hips, giving you that Statue of David silhouette. This is something Cary Grant understood.
The central thing about Cary Grant's style is that he always looked elegant, even in To Catch a Thief (1955), where he wore a long-sleeve striped shirt, wide pants, loafers, and a neckerchief.
Comfort is central to elegance because you can not look elegant if you are uncomfortable. Tristan puts darts on everything—even the front of his shirts—because he wants to show off his figure. That's fine if that's your aesthetic, but it's not dressing like Grant.
The last thing I want to note, which I've noted in other threads, is that fitness is different from style. It's fine to be into fitness. But it's not true that you have to be a certain body shape to be stylish or dress well.
You also don't have to wear tailoring. My friend @DavidLaneDesign, who posts under the name bigfits1 on Instagram, is super stylish because he knows how to dress for his body type and how to use clothes as social language. There are lots of great casual looks on his Instagram
IMO, Tristan—and many of the people who follow him—associate style too much with having a certain body type (muscular), living a certain lifestyle, driving fast cars, and having a lot of wealth.
I think style is more about knowledge and developing your eye. My friend Tim thrifts most of his clothes or shops from affordable brands like Spier & Mackay. The blazer and grey trousers you see here were things his mom bought from Ralph Lauren when he was 16
IG thefoxtooth
Grant had a level of style few will ever reach. But I think Tim and David get closer to it—despite not following Tristan's style advice—because they employ certain ideas. Meanwhile, Tristan lacks Grant's elegance because he doesn't pay enough attention to the details.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two terrible takes. The second somehow worse than the first. 🧵
Wool and down are just materials, like linen or cotton. They can be used to make anything. Down doesn't have to be a Canada Goose parka. It can be something like a Rocky Mountain Featherbed vest or a Nigel Cabourn Everest parka.
The second is great because it's modeled after something Sir Edmund Hillary and his team wore on their climb up Mount Everest. The advantage of natural down is that it's very warm for its weight; synthetic versions are better in wet conditions. Fill power count tells you warmth.
It's a lot easier to understand fashion/ clothing if you think of it in terms of social language, not purely in terms of function or artistic expression. I will give you some examples. 🧵
Have you ever wondered why there's this buttonhole on a jacket's lapel? Or really, suit jackets and sport coats have lapels at all? The lapels seemingly serve no practical function and yet take a bit of fabric and skill to make.
The answer is in the garment's history.
The lapel's buttonhole is a vestigial detail from when sport jackets could be buttoned up all the way up to the neck to protect the wearer from blustery cold. Here, we see single and double-breasted coats with what's known as a Ghillie collar.
Some quick reactions to the menswear outfits seen tonight at the Golden Globes show. Please note that none of these comments are personal. I'm just reacting to the outfits. 🧵
IMO, Daniel Craig's outfit has too much velvet. Compare him to Hiroyuki Senada, who wears a similar outfit but ditches the vest. I think this improves the look, as black velvet can suck up a lot of light. The white shirt here provides some needed contrast.
Not a fan of these unusual double-breasted jackets made with one or two button closures. I don't think it improves on the traditional design. The lapels are also too narrow for his frame and the shoes are too inelegant for the outfit.
I said "one of the most," not "the most." But I'm happy to explain why Kapital has been *one of the most* creative, fun, and interesting menswear brands in the last twenty years. Hopefully this thread inspires you to explore the world of offbeat Japanese workwear. 🧵
In 1985, Toshikiyo Hirata built a clothing factory in Kojima District, Okayama, an area known as Japan's denim capital (hence the brand's name). He had just spent time in the US, where he fell in love with vintage jeans, so he wanted to make American workwear using Japanese craft
In 2002, his son Kiro Hirata joined the company. Kiro is immensely creative and borrows heavily on Americana, workwear, and counter-cultural movements. He uses familiar archetypes: the hippie, surf bum, war vet biker, rock star, etc. But designs feel psychedelic.
The first and most obvious is that taste is a social construct shaped by forces such as cultural and financial capital. As Pierre Bourdieu pointed out in his book Distinction, our notions of "Good Taste" is often nothing more than the preferences and habits of the ruling class.
In this sense, judgements of taste tend to be path dependent. Dress shirts are considered to be in "good taste" when they're white or light blue for no other reason than the fact that's what elites wore. Black dress shirts are associated with the lower, sometimes criminal classes
Like a lot of stuff in classic men's dress, the rule of "no white after Labor Day" is rooted in class dynamics during the early 20th century. Many questions can be answered by "what is the aesthetic?" and "who set the rules?" 🧵
During the early 20th century, men's dress was governed by TPO (time, place, and occasion). In England, where we get many of our rules, men did business in London while wearing navy suits and black oxfords. But when in the country, they wore brown tweeds and grained derbies.
This is where we get the rule "no brown in town." The idea was that you were not supposed to wear brown tweeds and brown grained derbies while doing business in London (a rule that held pretty firmly until relatively recently, at least for sectors like finance).