The action we should be considering is whether universities deserve the massive federal benefits and funds given to them. We should be taking this demonstration of what universities produce (and make no mistake, these protests are a natural part of the ideology on campus for decades) to pull their funding, tax their endowments, and generally rein them massively in if they wish to stay wards of the taxpayer. Instead, the GOP seems to be working on appointing anti-semitism hall monitors at corrupt institutions. GOP proving itself wholly incapable of notching Ws once again.
Then there’s the cowering reaction in the face of these completely pathetic protests. WHY? The danger these protestors pose to both Jews and the US is primarily through what we can call the Chesa Boudin route - that they’re just the latest class to graduate into the Fortune 500, DOJ, and the next Democratic administration. In that sense, they’re an enormous threat, as they have been for the last decade and more.
But a physical threat? The assaults so far have been people wrestling over flags etc. There’s language that amounts to Title VI violations, sure, sue the crap out of universities. Don’t cower, don’t stay home, don’t whine. This isn’t kristallnacht. Stand upright, you have a perfect right to be there as a student, or as a counter-protester.
Things we should absolutely do:
- haul university presidents in front of Congress to humiliate them
- cut taxpayer loans and grants to universities
- file CRA lawsuits against universities when they’re in violation
Things we should NOT do:
- send in the national guard to solve university admins’ self-created problems for them
- create carveouts or appoint hall monitors specifically for anti-semitism that will do exactly nothing in the face of the overwhelming ideological commitments of universities
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, the Biden admin is releasing regulations more powerful than most real legislation. His Title IX changes:
- Redefine sex in civil rights law to include gender identity, exposing girls and women across the country to men in their bathrooms, sports teams, and locker rooms
- Reinstate Obama-era kangaroo court rules for men accused of sexual assault on college campuses that completely flout due process and make mere accusation the standard that can ruin young men’s lives
- Encourage universities to unconstitutionally curtail protected speech in the name of subjective offense and “harassment”; empower schools to enforce rules like punishing children for using biologically incorrect pronouns
- Curtail parents’ rights to know what schools are doing with their own children with regard to “gender transition”
Each one of these changes itself would be a five-alarm fire, and in many cases represent unconstitutional curtailment of established rights, rights federal courts have consistently upheld. These changes will be challenged in court. But it’s a good reminder of the enormous power of bureaucracy to massively change American law and curtail all of our rights overnight.
Not being one myself, I’m honestly offended on behalf of the Christian moral majority of the 90s because the people who styled themselves “rational” and “data-driven” have reacted to the MM basically being right about the direction of everything by doubling down on contempt.
The “rational, data-driven” reaction to being completely wrong is to reconsider why people you thought were drooling morons got it right. But instead the reaction is still a status game of separating yourself from the icky mouthbreathers (who were right while you were wrong).
Having watched this long interview, I think Tucker did a decent job. He let Putin talk & talk but this is his interview style (not a great one imho for this reason). Tucker’s Qs were challenging, not obsequious. More thoughts on the substance of Putin’s answers when I have time.
There’s value in Americans listening to this version of history, but unfortunately not in their current state of knowing none of their own. Like zoomers reading the Bin Laden letter and nodding along. Fortunately, the average American fell asleep 15 mins in. Still, an act of journalism.
For those who know at least a bit about WWII, I ask that you apply your incredulous response to Putin on that subject (Poles started WWII?) to the rest of his historical fantasies.
A dispatch from idiot island, where the people who are still triple masking rule and liberal women who drove off their husbands hold sway, follows:
My husband and I thought, after the sad natural passing of our wonderful, missed, and very elderly dog, that we would get a new kitten to keep our middle-aged cat company. And there are hundreds of stray cats and kittens all over NYC, so like two naive people, we thought doing the good deed of giving one of them a good home was going to be easy.
We are both cat people, both had cats our whole lives. We have a nice little apartment by city standards. So when we went down to one of the pet supply stores and saw a cute little guy about 6 months old, we applied to take him home, especially since we’d seen the same cats in the store for months. How sad, we thought, no one wants them!
It is observably true. Our guarantee was +200 pts or $ back, I never once had to issue the refund w 100s of students. The SAT is a completely bankrupt test devoid of any of its 90s and prior content. The right here is just defending the skin suit of a long-hollowed out thing.
I know “studies say” (many of them done on previous iterations of the test) but I’m sorry in this case I believe my years of direct experience. The SAT is eminently gameable and teachable.
Pls send ur kids to take @CLT_Exam instead, and judge the worthiness of the colleges they’re trying to enter by whether or not they accept that test