Kevin McKernan Profile picture
Apr 30 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Let play a game.
Can anyone make sense of these contradicting Pfizer-Regulator documents.

So the SV40 Promoter is not responsible for plasmid manufacturing.
But it’s the promoter for the Kanamycin resistance gene? Image
The documents submitted to the EMA show they use 50ug/ml of Kanamycin to replicate the plasmid.
How does that work?
No Promoter, no Kanamycin resistance..
No plasmid manufacturing?
Image
Image
They also claim the DNA has no functional consequences.

Moderna’s patents disagree.

Maybe dysfunctional consequences is a better term? Image
Drayman et al begs to differ.
SV40 promoters bind to P53 Tumor suppressor genes.

@TamaraUgo Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan

Kevin McKernan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

Apr 28
The targeted enrichment of BNT162b2 is working.

We have a 22,000 fold enrichment for plasmid containing sequences from cell lines treated with vaccine. Image
The variants in the plasmid have reproduced themselves for a 3rd time.

We do not see these in the vaccine alone. Only when the vaccine is in contact with OVCAR3 cell lines.

This implies the DNA is active in those cell lines and likely replicating. Image
Now that we are enriching for reads which match the plasmid sequence, we get many more reads that map to plasmid+human. Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 23
Well, well, well,

As health agencies assure the public that the DNA contamination is of no consequence, behind the scenes they are scurrying to have it removed from future vaccines!
No prior vaccine in Canada has been approved with such a sequence contaminant.
@FLSurgeonGen
Pfizer assured them the sequence is not material to plasmid manufacturing.
This is an overt lie.
You cannot make plasmids without the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene.

It is active in mammalian cells.
If it’s not needed, why is it in there? Image
Regulators are asking for their PCR protocol.
That means they have performed ZERO checks on this DNA contamination themselves and are entirely relying on the word of the manufacturer.
They look at the Fluorometry data as well ask why 2 diff methods? Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 21
Let’s dissect Berensons horrible capacity to critically read scientific literature.
“The Best Study Yet”

Says the guy selling a reefer madness book.

Did Alex really read the study or just parrot one that supports his fear porn over a plant?
Lets look
First order of business.
How do these authors make money?

Oh… by treating cannabis use disorder!

You need to associate cannabis with harms in order for society to believe they should pay for treatment.

The authors declare no conflict despite how blatant and overt this is.

Image
Image
Image
It’s ironic that the authors are from an institution notorious for using violence against its patients.
Life threatening and traumatic restraints have killed patients under their care.

So now that we understand what these physicians are pimping let’s walk through their scam.
Read 18 tweets
Apr 16
Who wants to teach a Yale PhD about reverse transcriptase and what happens to the nucleus during cell division?

For extra credit you can teach her about frameshifting, template switching and dsDNA contamination.

youcanknowthings.com/2020/12/10/wha…
While a helpful high school version of biology,
Her statement about the 100% unidirectional nature of DNA was put to bed decades ago when we sequenced the human genome and found 8% of it coded for HERVs.
Most cell biologists also understand that when cells divide the nuclear envelope dissolves allowing cytosolic RNA and DNA to enter the nucleus.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 12
In true form, the journalist never links to the paper.

Did you not realize that?

If you go digging for it, you’ll see it’s a non peer reviewed study designed to never find a 1:5000 event like myocarditis.
But one person died 4 days after vax and they chalked it up as coincidence.

cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
@Doctor_Eric_B Note, this is a CDC MMWR which is non peer reviewed propaganda.

They have to gall to claim they have no conflicts despite working for the CDC that sells $ billions of vaccines every year.
Image
Image
@Doctor_Eric_B No conflicts declared…
Really. Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 22
.@USMortality is sending letters to my employer trying to claim I doxxed him but spelled his name wrong?

That got a chuckle or two.

But at least we know he’s the cancel culture type that got @MartinKulldorff fired.

Stay away from this fraud.
I’m going to guess the reason he/it doesn’t want his name correctly spelled as it might risk his employment if people figured out who Ben M is.

But he’s just fine sending in complaints to other people’s employers.

Funny how that works.
Of course…
His actual name is public so the doxxing claim is pure BS.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1383894…
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(