In this old Brooks Brothers catalog from 1915, we see an entry for Chesterfields, a type of single-breasted "city coat" made with a velvet collar. At the time, Brooks Brothers offered these in Vicuna, Cheviot, and Elysian. Coats were lined in satin and piped with velvet.
Joshua Ellis, a British mill mostly known for cashmere, still offers Elysian today. It's a labor-intensive overcoating made with two layers of plain weave sewn together, then covered in a third layer of weft floats. This gives it a nap like velvet or corduroy.
You can see that in skilled hands, this material can still be used to create the silhouettes discussed in that original post. But the material is very expensive—$350/ meter. A tailor needs 4 meters to make an overcoat, so $1,400 for fabric alone.
Coat by The Anthology
The idea that modern fabrics are necessarily delicate is also a myth. Here are some old suit trousers. We know the owner wore them hard because there's evidence that the waist has been let out. The knee lining has also been worn through.
Yet, the trouser hem is in perfect condition, even on the inside. The suit jacket's sleeve cuff is also fine. And the most telling sign of all: there is no wear to the trouser seat, which is usually the first part of a suit to give out.
Photos via Tutto Fatto a Mano
The biggest difference between vintage and modern fabrics is weight. People used to wear heavier, coarser materials. But flip this suit inside out, and you will see the selvedge. This is a British-made Super 150s cloth. (Super wools are made from very fine fibers)
There are dozens of quality cloth mills and merchants, most of them located in the UK or Italy. Some names include Harrisons of Edinburgh, Holland & Sherry, Dugdale, Fox Brothers, Huddersfield Fine Worsteds, VBC, Cerruti, Loro Piana, Drapers, and Lovat (a favorite for tweed).
Years ago, @NickSullivanESQ commissioned a series of videos from @paddygrant to be posted on Esquire, which showcased British manufacturing. Here's one on Fox Brothers, a fabric mill known for its flannel (the wool kind used for suits, not the stuff for shirts).
Here's Douglas Cordeaux, co-owner of Fox Brothers, wearing some clothes made from his company's fabrics. Pretty nice shaping, right? What determines this is not just cloth, but skilled tailoring and pressing.
The starting price for Fox flannel is $250/ meter, and you need 4 meters for a suit. However, all prices here are for ppl outside of the trade. Tailors—and especially factories—get discounts. A brand can pay as little as ~$30/ meter for quality fabric (not Fox, but other mills)
But if a brand needs 4m for a garment and pays $30/ meter, that's already $120. Add trims, labor, and basic business costs (e.g., storage, marketing). Then multiply the price by 2x so they can make a profit. And another 2x so the store servicing you can profit. Stuff adds up
The main thing missing is demand. You don't even need luxurious materials to make a shaped garment. You need customers with trained eyes and a willingness to take risks. Here's a photo of @julieragolia (pic by @urban_comp)
Notice the shape of those trousers—the curve in the leg. You can get a similar cut through De Bonne Facture (their balloon-leg pants in drill cotton). The main reason they're expensive is because they're small batch production.
Some materials, such as Elysian, are necessarily expensive because of the labor involved, but other materials, such as cotton, can be cheap. Even Alpha Industries' nylon bombers have shape. Lots of good clothes out there, and you can also shop second-hand.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you like quality for quality's sake, and you mostly wear casualwear, then I think you should check out the Japanese brand 45rpm. 🧵
I fell in love with 45rpm 15 years ago after coming across their lookbooks. Their lookbooks at the time were often shot by Eric Kvatek, a talented photographer who now works for Kapital. Here are some images from more recent lookbooks (my old image files are too low res)
The thing about 45pm is that the "quality" is not always apparent to casual observers. Years ago, Antonio of 18 East—who used to run an Isaia sub-label called Eidos—broke down all the work that went into these seemingly basic navy 45rpm chinos.
Someone from @piersmorgan's staff asked if I would like to come onto Pier's show, Piers Morgan Uncensored, to talk about the state of his attire. Since he invited feedback, I thought I'd do a thread comparing his style to menswear icon Kermit the Frog. 🧵
Let's again start with the basics.
The core of any outfit is fit and silhouette. Pier's suit jackets often have lapels that buckle away from his chest and a collar that floats from his neck. This suggests his jackets may be too small.
No such issues for Kermit the Frog. His clothes hang beautifully and smoothly while still giving a distinctive, flattering silhouette.
The buttoning point is the topmost button on a two-button coat or the center button on a three-button coat. It serves as the coat's visual fulcrum, determines the narrowest part of a jacket, and is where the lapels bloom.
Here, we see Jackson has a very muscular figure. The V-shape formed by his broad shoulders and narrow waist is even more extreme than the Statue of David.
I disagree that you dress like Cary Grant. In this thread, I will list some of the ways in which your dress differs and why such important details matter. 🧵
On Twitter and elsewhere, I often notice that people collapse men's style into very broad forms. A suit is just a suit, and pants are just pants. But in fact, tiny differences make a huge impact, and more attention should be paid to silhouette, shape, and detailing.
Let's start with the basics.
A collar gap can appear if your jacket's shoulders don't match the slope of your natural shoulders. Or if the jacket isn't cut right for your posture. Or the jacket is too tight across the chest (the most likely reason for Tristan's collar gap)
Along with keeping you warm and protecting you from the elements, our clothing performs other important functions: making us look good, communicating our identity, and speaking in a language that makes cultural sense. In tailoring, the number of buttons communicates something. 🧵
A one-button closure is considered formal. With the exception of Huntsman, a Savile Row tailoring house that has made it part of its house style, it is typically only seen on evening wear, such as dinner suits (aka tuxedos).
A two-button closure is less formal than one button. On Savile Row, this was the standard for business suits, which are less formal than eveningwear. The bottommost button here is not meant to be fastened.
Here are two suits from the NFL Draft? Which do you like better?
Before reading on, please take the time to make up your mind independently, so you are not influenced by what I'm about to say. I will give my opinion below on which works better. 🧵
I should note I don't know anything about sports or these two men. The following is just commentary on the clothes, not them as people or athletes. Getting into the NFL is a massive accomplishment, and clothes don't take away from that. Congrats to both on their achievements.
Between these two suits, I think the pink one works better. Many will be drawn to the fabric: the color, sheen, and what looks to be a camo pattern. All these elements make it unique. It's also nice that it complements the woman's dress without directly matching. Very thoughtful