Russia is actively recruiting soldiers to replace massive casualties in Ukraine, bolstering the myth of almost endless Russian human resources. We've been looking into it, and the picture isn't as pretty as the Putin regime would like the world to believe. 1/n
After realizing that 200k troops was not enough to defeat Ukraine in 2022, Russia started using every recruitment trick in the book, in many cases, using methods directly from Stalin's playbook. 2/n
In the early part of 2022, Russia was able to recruit Russian nationalists and other ideologically-motivated volunteers, who had already served in the Russian army (in many cases they were old enough to have served in the Soviet Army) or hadn't been eligible for service. 3/n
Nationalistic volunteers were not necessarily fighting only for money, in many cases they believed that they were helping restore Russia to some kind of previous glory, whether Soviet or pre-Soviet imperial. 4/n
In parallel, in 2022, Russia increased mobilization efforts in Russian-occupied Donetsk and Luhansk, hunting down young and old men alike who had previously evaded serving in Russian DPR/LNR units. In 2022, these men formed the bulk of Russian cannon fodder. 5/n
Forcing Ukrainian citizens stuck in Russian-occupied territories into meat storms was an ideal strategy for Russia because it helped insulate Russian society from massive casualties, but eventually that resource started running out. 6/n
By fall 2022, Ukraine had mobilized close to a million motivated people, outnumbering Russian troops, many of whom were now disillusioned by the war. At this critical juncture, had the West surged weapons to Ukraine, Russian front lines would have completely collapsed. 7/n
Indeed, by late fall 2022, Ukraine has liberated most of the Kharkiv region and the city of Kherson, pushing Russian troops to the eastern bank of the Dnipro. At this point, the momentum was on Ukraine's side. 8/n
As Ukrainians pleaded for an increase in weapons and ammo to take advantage of a small window of opportunity to decisively defeat Russia when it was on the back foot, Russian commanders were pleading for additional troops to prevent the looming defeat. 9/n
Although the West, adamantly refused to surge weapons to Ukraine, fearing a Russian defeat, Putin heeded the calls of his commanders and announced a mobilization campaign, which he had wanted to avoid, as a last ditch attempt to prevent defeat. 10/n
As a million Ukrainians were forced to wait for weapons that never arrived or were severely and deliberately delayed by the West, instead of quickly liberating poorly defended Russian-occupied territories, Russia began mobilizing several hundred thousand troops. 11/n
Thanks to the Russian mobilization effort and cooperation from a West uncommitted to a Ukrainian victory, Russia stabilized the front lines and renewed its own offensive operations. 12/n
Although Russia's capacity, such as facilities and personnel, to train new recruits were limited, Russia used Belarus to expand that capacity and began to streamline the training process, focusing on increasing the quantity of troops over their quality. 13/n
Stalin's "quantity has a quality all its own" approach was now Russia's path forward. If in the 2010s, Russia (mostly unsuccessfully) tried to modernize its armed forces to have better trained and equipped soldiers, it was now reverting back to meat wave warfare. 14/n
With Ukraine being drip-fed weapons, troop quality was now far less important for Russia than sheer numbers. Now Russian orphans, psychiatric patients, and convicts would be assaulting Ukrainian defenses. 15/n
Russian private military companies like Wagner, recruited mercenaries, especially from the prison system, furthering swelling the ranks of Russian forces in Ukraine to around 500k soldiers. 16/n
After the bloody battles of Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and other small towns and villages in eastern Ukraine, Russia began depleting the convict resource, and started searching for other ways to increase the troop count, especially as Ukrainian resistance remained fierce. 17/n
Although there is constant speculation that Putin will announce a new mobilization wave, he has so far refrained from doing so, fearing that it could undermine his regime, especially in the wake of Prigozhin's revolt. 18/n
Instead, Russia has been quietly recruiting around 30k soldiers/month using a hidden mobilization, that relies on a carrot-and-stick approach. This effort has been sufficient to replace casualties while Ukraine is outgunned, but insufficient to achieve a victory. 19/n
Because mass mobilization carries risks, the Putin regime has distributed that risk across regions and institutions in an attempt to redirect any discontent with the Kremlin, which protected by state propaganda, tries to stay above the fray as much as possible. 20/n
In the "Good Tsar, bad Boyars" paradigm, local Russian officials do much of the dirty work of recruiting soldiers, while Putin escapes popular wrath. Russian institutions and regions are required to meet mobilization quotas and pay the price whether they fail or succeed. 21/n
For example, regional officials offer amnesty to people facing criminal convictions if they sign up to fight in Ukraine. In some cases, the charges may be bogus or motivated by local political or financial disputes, but some prefer fighting in Ukraine for pay to prison. 22/n
To meet mobilization quotas, wealthier Russian regions are literally buying people from poorer regions, promising them bigger paychecks if they sign up as recruits from the wealthier regions. 23/n
Because the Russian economy is on a war footing, those working in the military industrial complex are exempt from serving in the military, which has incentivized regions and companies to increase the number of (often low-paying) jobs in the military industrial sector. 24/n
Recently, the price of recruitment has dramatically increased severalfold across multiple regions. For example, in regions like Krasnodar Krai, authorities are offering recruits staggering $10k/month salaries. 25/n
As fewer Russians are willing to risk their lives in Ukraine, the price of recruitment is increasing, tension between regions is growing (especially as places like Chechnya enjoy special protection from the war), and the need for increasingly unpopular measures is evident. 26/n
Russia needs a large mobilization wave to achieve any major results, but its resources are not limitless. The idea that Ukrainians will run out of bullets before Russia runs out of people is Kremlin propaganda, which can be easily obliterated by properly arming Ukraine. 27/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Extorting Ukraine for its natural resources that dwarf any aid that the US has ever provided or could ever provide by threatening to turn off Starlink access is an expected and cruel development, which Ukraine has been preparing for. 1/9
Starlink is perhaps the most significant American tech used by Ukraine. It is the backbone of command and control systems and especially drone warfare. The strategic significance of the weapons America has provided pale in comparison to Starlink. 2/9
America has simply never provided sufficient quantities of any weapons systems for them to have the same kind of impact that Starlink has had. There are tens of thousands of Starlink terminals in Ukraine, and that number is growing. 3/9
Assad's regime has fallen, with Russian forces scrambling like rats from a sinking ship, like they did during Wagner's march on Moscow. As always, the West stands slack-jawed and impotent on the sidelines, while Putin gets another reminder of the fragility of absolute power. 1/15
Putin put on a successful decade-long and extremely bloody theatrical production in which he played the role of Assad's protector and humiliator of cowardly and delusionally naive Western leaders like Obama, who ended up tacit accomplices to Russian crimes around the world. 2/15
While Obama led the West "from behind," sacrificing the credibility of America's promises or power projection to appease Moscow, Putin took advantage of the power vacuum to present himself as a reliable ally to anti-Western forces. 3/15
Before 2022, Russia's troubles in Georgia and Syria would have seemed potentially disastrous for Putin. Now, they're dwarfed by Russia's war against Ukraine—a war that will forever define the Putin regime and the future of Russia itself. 1/8
Russia is undoubtedly looking for ways to back pro-Kremlin proxies in Georgia and to bolster Assad in Syria, but there's only so much it can do when it's running the meat grinder for its own forces at full power in Ukraine. 2/8
In Georgia, Russia can deploy some FSB special forces and "titushky" (mercenary street thugs), repeating the tactics it used against Ukraine in 2014. In Syria, it would need to deploy a significant number of troops and air power, which is far more difficult now. 3/8
Ukraine's air force has confirmed that Russia launched an intercontinental ballistic missiles, hitting Dnipro. This is the first use of an ICBM in combat and was clearly intended to intimidate the West as part of Russia's extremely successful narrative-shaping campaign. 1/9
Given all the earlier chatter of an impending Russian ICBM attack, it may have been coordinated with the West. An ICBM launch can trigger a response from nuclear-armed states, and Russia may have warned the West ahead of an attack, as it has done prior to ICBM test launches. 2/9
ICBMs are essentially space vehicles, making them extremely large, expensive, difficult to manufacture, and Russian ICBMs are also inaccurate, which is part of the reason that it doesn't make sense to use them with non-nuclear warheads, as Russia has now done. 3/9
A credible Western "escalation" against Russia would give Putin the off-ramp that the "escalation managers" and peacemongers insist he needs—ironically, it’s the only path to achieving the very outcome they claim to pursue. 1/12
For Putin, losing to Ukraine is an unforgivable humiliation, especially when he has far more resources and more reliable allies than Ukraine. The West's appeasement has given him every reason to continue. 2/12
Watching and reading Russian propaganda, one sees how humiliating losing to Ukraine is. Whenever, Ukrainians succeed—for example, by shooting down Russian jets—Russia usually blames malfunctions or human error. 3/12
The Biden-Harris administration's calculated withholding of urgent weapons from Ukraine—effectively shielding Russia from defeat when victory was within reach—has made Trump's reelection seem far less catastrophic, perhaps even offering a silver lining. 1/8
Neither Trump nor Harris are allies of Ukraine, and a Harris win would mean 4 more years of Obama advisors implementing Russia/Iran appeasement policies. Trump could be even worse, but his unpredictability allows for unexpected, yet welcome outcomes. 2/8
In one of the most optimistic scenarios, the US would loan Ukraine the weapons it needs instead of gifting them, requiring it to repay at a later date, something that Biden-Harris refused to do, despite Congress passing the Lend-Lease Act of 2022. 3/8