EVIDENCE TAMPERING? Biden DOJ/Jack Smith just admitted they messed with boxes supposedly containing "classified" documents they seized from Trump and can't be sure the order or placement of the documents as originally found has been maintained -- which is contrary to what they assured the court!
Footnote 3: The Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government counsel
previously understood and represented to the Court. See, e.g., 4/12/24 Hearing Tr. at 65
(Government responding to the Court’s question of whether the boxes were “in their original, intact
form as seized” by stating “[t]hey are, with one exception; and that is that the classified documents
have been removed and placeholders have been put in the documents”
And here is an admission of the FBI completely screwing with the classified documents:
"After the boxes were brought to WFO, the FBI created an index to correlate the documents with classification markings to codes (e.g., document “bb”) and labeled the classified cover sheets in the boxes with the codes for the seized documents. The FBI also generally replaced the handwritten sheets with classified cover sheets annotated with the index code, but regardless, any handwritten sheets that currently remain in the boxes do not represent additional classified documents—they were just not removed when the classified cover sheets with the index code were added. In many but not all instances, the FBI was able to determine which document with classification markings corresponded to a particular placeholder sheet."
.@JudicialWatch, through hard-fought Federal FOIA lawsuits, exposed Fauci's dishonesty about gain of function and its funding, his agency's close relationship to Wuhan and other dangerous research, etc. This #FauciFiles thread contains the real truth about his legacy:
So we wanted to ask Hillary Clinton basic questions about her emails. Unfortunately, the political DC courts (and Supreme Court) protected her with dishonest rulings. Compare and contrast with effort to JAIL citizens who object to Pelosi rump 1/6 committee harassment.
Hillary Clinton ignored law but received special protection from both courts and law enforcement. For countless Americans, this double standard of justice destroyed confidence in fair administration of justice. And this DC rule of law collapse continues... judicialwatch.org/hrc-scotus-ref…
Judge Lamberth ruled she must testify by leftist appellate court rewrote FOIA law and changed the rules to protect Hillary. Supreme Court refused to step in to protect the rule of law and FOIA. judicialwatch.org/scotus-hillary…
Thread: Ten steps Biden could take immediately and in the near-future to increase domestic energy production, supply, lower costs here at home, and assert American energy superiority around the world. foxnews.com/opinion/putin-…
Immediately unfreeze all oil and gas leases and drilling permits, that were paused by the Biden Admin in February 2022. The White House unilaterally blocked hundreds of leases and permits after a federal district court ruled against its “Social Cost of Carbon” regulation scheme.
Allow the implementation of the “Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program” in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), which were suspended by the Department of Interior in June 2021. This includes reissuing 10-year leases on nine tracts covering more than 430,000 acres.
Federal judge blocks Biden vaccine mandate for health care workers in Missouri, 9 other states Biden admin seeks to impose "an unprecedented demand to federally dictate the private medical decisions of millions of Americans." news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-…
Federal court: "Indeed, CMS states that “the effectiveness of the vaccine[s] to prevent disease transmission by those vaccinated [is] not currently known.”
Court: "Review of the affidavits filed in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction shows the harm to the physical health and well-being of their states’ citizens if the mandate is not enjoined."
BREAKING: Six justices of Supreme Court attack our republican form of government --rewrite federal civil rights law, in exercise of raw judicial power, to change definition of "sex" to "sexual orientation" and "gender identity." Legislating from the bench is an abuse of power.
There has been years long battle by Left to change federal law to bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and identity. But Supreme Court today short-circuited the democratic process and rewrote the law without a vote of Congress but by a vote of six unelected judges.
A Supreme Court majority essentially ruled today that Congress is a joke. The majority is right, not because they were right to hijack Congress's power to legislate under the Constitution, but because Congress will do nothing about this abusive power grab.