Post

More from @JohnBeaudoinSr

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Apr 16

1/ INTRODUCTION
APPELLATE BRIEF IN 1ST CIRCUIT
BEAUDOIN v BAKER
corrections in [backets]

John Paul Beaudoin, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES D. BAKER, JR. individually as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; MAURA T. HEALEY, in her Official Capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; MARGARET R. COOKE, individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; MINDY HULL, individually and in her Official Capacity as Chief Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; JANICE Y. GRIVETTI, individually and in her Official Capacity as Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; MICHELE N. MATTHEWS, individually and in her Official Capacity as Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; ROBERT M. WELTON, individually and in her Official Capacity as Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; JULIE HULL, individually and in her Official Capacity as Medical Examiner of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
Defendants - Appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Massachusetts

No. 1:22-cv-11356-NMG

Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF

INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff brought this entirely equitable action against the defendants because the plaintiff was deprived of the right to a legal education due to his refusal to show proof of covid “vaccination.” The law school requiring covid “vaccination” stated that they enacted the “vaccine” mandate because of the number of covid deaths claimed by the defendants and because the “vaccine” would somehow make everyone safe if everyone was injected with it as stated by the defendants.

The plaintiff received and analyzed nearly five hundred thousand (~500,000) un-redacted death records from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The plaintiff determined that numerous death records are false writings. The defendants have not corrected the false writings even after receiving notice derived from this lawsuit in September 2022. The defendants massively overcounted covid deaths through fraud on public records and hid covid “vaccine”- caused deaths from the public by intentional omission of the true causes of death. Since the cover-up of the “vaccine”- caused deaths, several thousand more people in Massachusetts died as a result of covid “vaccination.”

The law school that unenrolled the plaintiff and other law schools to which the plaintiff was interested in applying stated publicly that the reasons for the mandates are the covid death counts and stated that the “vaccine” is “safe and effective,” both of which are the responsibility of the defendants and both of which are false statements.

No reasonable person would conclude that law schools would have enacted “vaccine” mandates if they knew the TRUTH documented from the Commonwealth’s own official records in 123 pages in EXHIBIT F of this case. But for the fraudulent misrepresentations put forth by the defendants, law schools would not have enacted mandates. There is “no reasonable doubt” of traceability, a standard far beyond what is necessary to confer standing.

The plaintiff has another case in state court for a contract breach against the law school. That is a separate matter. The matter at hand is narrow and specific in order to stop the injury. The requested relief is to enjoin the defendants to publicly admit the TRUTH regarding the official records of Massachusetts. Tell the TRUTH to the people is all that is really necessary.

No reasonable person would believe that law schools would not immediately drop “vaccine” mandates if they were told the TRUTH that deaths caused by covid “vaccination” were labeled as “covid” deaths, that accidental deaths from fentanyl overdose, blunt force trauma to the head, blunt force trauma to the torso, and other hundreds of accidental deaths were labeled “covid” deaths, that the CARES Act is a behavior modification device that, through large financial incentives, changed the behavior of doctors to ventilate people who had oxygen saturation in the nineties percent. The massive fraud on The People is also a massive murder of The People. And this court and the prior court may misuse and abuse “standing doctrine” to flick this case away, but they cannot flick away their own and their family members’ heart attacks, strokes, turbo dementia, turbo cancers, acute renal failures, aortic dissections, and many other “vaccine”- caused injury[ies] and death[s].

There is no doubt whatsoever that if the law schools were told the TRUTH by the defendants, then the law schools would immediately end covid “vaccine” mandates.

Let’s stop pretending that Iqbal’s Revenge has not killed a million people in the United States in the past four (4) years and that it was enabled by the courts’ misuse of “standing doctrine” case law.

2/
JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
The action arises under the United States Constitution, Amendment I right to petition a Court for a redress of grievances and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights.

This Court has jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s appeal from the final decision of the United States District Court for the District or Massachusetts under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Judgment was entered on October 27, 2023. This appeal is from a final judgment that disposed of all of [the plaintiff’s] Petitioner’s claims.

ISSUES PRESENTED
Whether the plaintiff has standing to sue the defendants, whose fraud caused “vaccine” mandates from law schools

Whether the plaintiff has an injury-in-fact.

Whether the plaintiff’s injury can be “fairly” traced to the conduct of the defendants.

Whether the plaintiff’s request for equitable relief, if ordered by the court, would redress the injury, ergo, cause the schools to drop the mandates.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The plaintiff, John Paul Beaudoin, Sr., is a systems engineer and has an MBA in Management.

The plaintiff investigated public health data put out to The People by the defendants and found massive amounts of fraud. The plaintiff further investigated by interviewing an agent from within a state organization and also correlated other databases such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) against the Commonwealth’s databases. The plaintiff’s irrefutable evidence has been shown to millions of people around the world and several thousand doctors and scientists. No one has refuted the facts evinced by the plaintiff, whose two (2) publications will ship to the public within a few weeks.

The plaintiff sued the defendants in August 2022, with all defendants served by September 9, 202[2]3. The District Court dismissed the suit in equity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12.(b)(6).

3/
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

The District Court found that the plaintiff lacked standing in stating that the plaintiff being barred from law schools by a “vaccine” mandate is a “generalized grievance.” The District Court also stated that it was “doubtful” that the plaintiff’s injury could be considered “concrete and particularized.” Further, the District Court stated that the plaintiff’s injury would doubtfully be deemed “actual or imminent.”

In addition to claiming that there is no injury-in-fact to the plaintiff, the District Court also stated that the plaintiff’s claims of fraudulent conduct by the defendants and their agents was “nothing more than a bare hypothesis that does not demonstrate that defendants’ conduct caused any law school to act.”

Lastly, the District Court also stated that the “plaintiff’s alleged loss of his right to a legal education would in no way be redressed by a favorable decision.”

The District Court’s dismissal appears to be a cookie cutter dismissal citing favorite cases of “standing doctrine” to flick away some pro se litigant, while never having read the complaint or EXHIBIT F of the complaint. The District Court made errors of fact and errors of law in the dismissal and stole the most foundational right in the Constitution from the plaintiff.

For example, The District Court, despite law schools expressly stating that they enacted mandates due directly to the covid data provided by defendants, stated that the law school “vaccine” mandates that injured the plaintiff cannot be traced to the conduct of the defendants. The traceability prong of Lujan is satisfied by the express statements of the third party law schools. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)

The plaintiff argues that “standing doctrine” has been overused, especially in this case, that the dismissal violates the plaintiff’s foundational right to petition the government for redress of grievances, that he has an obvious and concrete and actual and imminent and particular grievance that is in no way “generalized,” that the “plausible” standard is a subjective farce on The People, that judicial economy is the true reason behind “standing doctrine” and that the behavioral economics intersection with law is broken under Twiqbal, and that courts nowadays do not seem to understand the value of chancery in the context [of] cases such as the present one. This lack of understanding has presented itself in one million (1,000,000) Americans dying in the last four (4) years due to the broken court system, which is fundamental to the present case.

Read 11 tweets

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Mar 25

1/
I've seen docs saying there's no evidence of increased cancers. They dismiss Phinance Technologies' data from Ed Dowd or The Ethical Skeptic's data.

I don't have time to find and post. So please feel free to repost these pages of THE CDC MEMORANDUM.

Read 18 tweets

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Feb 17

https://twitter.com/pfizer/status/1756803720250036644

1/
#turbocancer

Pbrought pto pyou pby Pfizer

https://twitter.com/pfizer/status/1756803720250036644

2/
That is a page from EXHIBIT E of THE CDC MEMORANDUM (TCM)available next week in eBook form (hopefully) and in about 3 weeks in paper version.
Here is another
#turbocancer
set of graphs from TCM.

It's not just old people dying from turbo cancer.

Pfanx Pfizer

3/
Summing up the Lymph node cancer set, let's look at a simple bar set of bar graphs from TCM.
Does it look like #turbocancer is slowing down anytime soon?

Read 5 tweets

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Jan 16

https://twitter.com/pattycake34772/status/1742837664359821590

@FLSurgeonGen
1/
If you think mRNA vx is causing cancers, then why not let me analyze FL's data?

Here are pages from "The CDC Memorandum" due out in a few weeks as a publication. But you will get an unredacted official copy along with FL AG and Gov.

https://twitter.com/pattycake34772/status/1742837664359821590

Read 7 tweets

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Dec 9, 2023

1/
When did Minnesota start murdering people with CDC and FDA recommended covid drug protocols?

It wasn't when covid started.

It wasn't when the EUA's for remdesivir and baricitinib started.

IT WAS WHEN CMS STARTED PAYING A BONUS FOR THE USE OF REMDESIVIR, BARICITINIB.

2/
How many of these people 25-44 had spouses and children?

How many were healthy and went to the hospital because they had flu like symptoms and would have been fine at home?

3/
When will Minnesota investigate the murders at their hospitals?

Read 6 tweets

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

@JohnBeaudoinSr

Dec 7, 2023

1/
An extra 2 ppl died from acute renal failure involvement EVERY DAY for THREE YEARS in Minnesota

365 days X 3 years X 2ppl/day = 2,190 ppl EXCESS died from ARF in MN

> 100K across USA

Many answers in 1M death certificates
Why is big media not interested?

TheRealCdC dot com

2/
The greater evidence is in the fact that CDC and FDA have not changed their protocols since 2020

It's as if their intent is not public health, but rather to sell the drugs they hoped might work

If CDC and FDA do not evaluate the effects of those drugs EVER, then how will

3/
how will they know if they are killing or saving people or doing nothing but spending 4TRILLIONS through cms dot gov ?

They don't know. They don't want to know.

But they will be NOTIFIED by "The CDC Memorandum" in a couple weeks

They cannot run from the carnage they caused

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @JohnBeaudoinSr

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!