Between 1980 and 1994 the Royal Navy submarine service conducted over 130 highly classified missions to gather intelligence or covert operations. Even though the files are closed, it is still possible to draw some significant conclusions from the archives. /1
The missions involved both conventional and nuclear submarines operating mostly in the Arctic, North Atlantic, Med and off coast of Argentina. They usually involved intelligence gathering or operating in places they should not have been. /2
The pay off was huge - significant intelligence was generated to support wider operations, protect the nuclear deterrent and gather information to ensure our understanding of the threats could be properly analysed and assessed. This was crucial to winning the Cold War. /3
The long Pinstripedline blog analyses these deployments and for the first time ever lists all known RN submarine operations and intelligence gathering missions / patrols from 1980 - 1994 and assesses why it remains so important.
The blog may be of interest to @NavyLookout @UKDefJournal @EngageStrategy1 @fightingsailor @IBallantyn @SSN14CO @CovertShores @SubBrief @Saturnax1 @USN_Submariner @DaveGOwen @GaskarthJamie @MarkUrban01 @gordoncorera @RoryCormac among others!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In July 1984 the Royal Navy, RFA and RAF Nimrods conducted a TOP SECRET UK/US intelligence gathering mission in the Barents Sea. Its goal - to acquire intelligence on Soviet Navy operations, and obtain military hardware where possible. /1
(Blog at ) tinyurl.com/ycyp4na
The month long mission required Ministerial approval, and nearly clashed with a visit to Moscow by the Foreign Sec. Nerves were high as Nimrods practised covert insertion up to within 30 miles of Russian coastline, and the RN hoovered up as much intelligence as possible.
In early August the RN ships 'acquired' Soviet acoustic intelligence buoys in international waters. They 'liberated' two, and sunk others with gunfire, while the Soviet Navy tried, unsuccessfully, to stop them. A formal diplomatic protest was raised. /3
Today, I posted a blog talking about Admiral Nelson and asking whether the RN needed to re-evaluate its attitude to him - bit.ly/3nC4bSF
The response on social media has been, to put it mildly, depressing.
Many people clearly did not read the blog, or its views /1
There have been accusations of 'wokeness' and suggestions that it is silly to question his legacy.
I beg to differ - Nelson was a great naval officer, and it is right that his legacy is remembered. But he was complex, and held views on slavery that today we find challenging. /2
I think it is right to ask if in 21st Century Britain, having a man who opposed efforts to emancipate slaves as the central figure of, at times, near hero worship, is appropriate for the Royal Navy.
Does it send the right message, and how does it help promote diversity? /3