Abandoned to death: Ongoing Hindu genocide of a 1000 years.
Important thread about the unknown genocide of Kalash and Kafiristan tribes.
PS: This will be a long but informative thread about the past and present of a hardly known Hindu tribal community. Please read until the end.
🧵
Who are the Kalash?
The Kalash is a native tribe of around 4000 people residing in valleys of the Chitral District in Pakistan. This district shares borders with Nuristan in Afghanistan.
Unlike their neighbors, the Kalash are NOT Muslim even today. Their history in the last 600 years has been one of fierce resistance, determination to survive and fight back in the face of repeated genocides and prospect of extinction.
I begin by positing forth a few factual technicalities before proceeding with the actual story. Readers interested in actual story are free to skip whatever follows in brackets.
[Until 1895, the neighbors of Kalash people on Afghan side of the border, known today as Nuristanis, formed one cultural continuum with Kalash and shared their Non-Muslim religion. They were known to Muslims as 'Safed Posh Kafirs'('White Robed Kafirs') and 'Siyah Posh Kafirs'('black robed Kafirs') . This entire Hindukush region was formerly known as Kafiristan ( Lands of the Kafirs). Durand line divided Kafiristan into two. Kalash people fell under British protection but another section of Kafiristan fell to the lot of Afghan king Amir Abdur Rahman. The Amir forcibly converted the Kafiristan on his side of the border in 1895. This Kafiristan was then renamed as 'Nuristan'('Land of the light'). Linguistically speaking, the Kalash people are speakers of Indic language family( Sanskrit language group) whereas Nuristani languages are classified as a separate branch of Indo-Iranian linguistic family. Having specified these internal distinctions, the rest of the thread continues to tell the one history of Kafiristan and its people ]
The Kalash people, like many other groups of this region such as Pamiris and Hunza, display a relatively high frequency of Europoid Physical characteristics including fair skin, light eyes and blond hair. [This does not imply that every Kalash exhibits such physical characteristics. Many among them are physically indistinguishable from Punjabis].
This has led to a slug-fest of modern day ethnic appropriation and totally baseless claims. There is a popular myth that Kalash are descended from Alexander. Despite the fact that Alexander and his Greeks never entered Chitral and despite the complete absence of anything Greek including art, architecture, loanwords, religious influence etc among Kalash, the myth continues to persist.
However, modern scholarship and genetics has completely refuted this myth of Greek origin of Kalash.
The Kalash are genetically much closer to a Tiwari Brahman of Uttar Pradesh than they are to any Greek.
Scholars classify Kalash/Nuristan religion as 'ancient Hinduism'.
Noted Nuristan linguist Richard Strand says 'Before their conversion to Islam the Nuristanis practiced a form of ancient Hinduism'.
Noted Harvard linguist Michael Witzel says "In Kalash religion, many of the traits of myths, ritual,society, and echo many aspects of Ṛgvedic religion".
Recently, historian Augusto Cacopardo published his fieldwork which established beyond any doubt that social and cultural customs of Kalash are identical to Vedic.
Here are some Vedic/Hindu customs of Kalash:
1) Worship of Indra and Mahandeo(Shiva).
2)Avoidance of Sapinda marriages until 7th generation. Avoidance of cousin marriages like North Indian Hindus.
3)Avoidance of eggs, chicken and other foods prohibited in Hindu Dharmashastras.
4)Vedic concept of cleanliness and ritual purity.
5)Vedic festivals like Chaturmasya(Chowmos).
6)Stories of Pandava brothers.
Of course, this is not to say that Kalash religion is exactly identical to Puranic Hinduism. Geographically isolated from mainstream Hindus for millennia, Kalash lacked reception of newer religious developments within Hinduism and developed their own peculiarities. Yet, because of the same background, scholars classify Kalash religion as 'Para Vedic religion' or 'Ancient Hinduism'.
Having elucidated their Hindu heritage, I narrate the history of brave resistance and determination shown by Kalash Kafiristani Hindus in face of repeated invasions, ethnic cleansing and impending Genocide.
In 11th century, Mahmud Ghazni invaded Kabulistan and defeated Hindu Shahis. He claimed that he completely uprooted idolatry and raised the triumphant flag of Islam everywhere in his kingdom.
However, as we shall see, this claim turns out to be nothing but an empty boast. He failed.
Not only have the Kafirs survived Ghaznavid onslaught. They also reoccupied many of their former territories and drove back Muslim invaders.
Almost 400 years after Ghazni boasted of uprooting all infidels, Timur invaded India:
When he came to this Hindu Kush region, the local Muslim Pathans fell at Timur's feet. They begged Timur to rescue them from these Kafirs.
They said: ' Sir Timur, please save us. These Kafir idolaters blackmail us and exact annual tribute from us. On failure to pay, they carry us away. We fly at your feet for protection'.
So much for Ghazni's 'extermination of Kafirs'.
Source: Tuzuk-I-Timuri.
When Timur inquired further, he was told that the entire region from Kabul to Kashmir was ruled by Kafirs.
In other words, during c. 1398, the entire region from Kabul to Kashmir was still ruled by Kafiristani Hindus. They exacted tribute from Afghans and local Muslims
As a true Jihadi, Timur declared he would exterminate and wipe out the existence of these Kafir Hindus.
He invaded Kafiristan with a very large army. He personally led charge and surrounded them from all sides. Timur's army began 'dispatching unbelievers to hell'.
Timur ordered a tower of skulls of Kalash Kafirs to be built.
However, the Kafir Hindus were not ones to crumble.
A great number of them were kiIIed. Therefore, they tactically withdrew.
On the same occasion, however, they fell upon a commander of Timur named Burhan Aghlan.
Owing to fear of Kafirs, this commander dropped his arms and fled.
Timur's army was routed.
A small community of tribal Hindus in stuck in Hindu kush. A sea of Muhammadan enemies all around them. A large army of Timur to exterminate them.
One would expect these Kafirs to be uprooted.
However, exactly the opposite happened. This is a testament to the Hindu resistance and willpower to survive.
1527:
Around 130 years after Timur, we hear of these Kafirs again. This time from Babur's autobiography.
Not only did these Kafirs survive Timur's onslaught, they recovered and reestablished their kingdom.
They in fact exacted tributes from Muslims living as far as Panjshir.
The next Jihadi attack on Kafiristan was led by none other than secular hero Akbar.
In 1581, Akbar reached Jalalabad. He sent an army to plunder and destroy Kafiristan.
Was the mighty Mughal army of Akbar able destroy the Kafirs? Was it able to force them into submission?
The answer is a clear no.
We have testimony of Portuguese Jesuit traveler Benedict Goës who traveled to this region in 1603, 22 years after Akbar's invasion.
He says that Kafiristan was an independent kingdom in which no Musalman was allowed to enter (Although Hindu merchants were allowed).
Any Muslim who tried to entered Kafiristan was executed.
This clearly shows Kafiristan still maintained its independence.
As they could not directly exterminate the Kafirs, the Mughals opened another front of war:
Raids into Kafiristan. Abduction, rαpe and enslavement of Kafir women.These captured women were distributed among Jihαdi soldiers.
This policy was carried out by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb himself. His armies raided into Kafiristan and abducted women. Aurangzeb presented a Kafir slave girl to his son Bahadur Shah.
This poor Kafir slave girl had already changed multiple hands.
Abducting and rαping Kalash women became Jihαdi past time. So much that markets in Central Asia were filled with these Kalash slaves.
This slave trade continued unabated until 20th century.
Muzlims especially craved for Kalash women who were renowned for their beauty.
The sεx slavery of Kalash girls well into the 19th and 20th centuries.
The Nizam of Hyderabad himself purchased 10-12 year old Kalash girls as sεx slaves.
This Kalash girl was the daughter of a priest. She was abducted by local Muslim Mehtar and sold to Nizam for 500 rupees. Her parents petitioned the British to return their girl to them. But no help ever came from British.
A point to be noted here. Even after geographical isolation and no contact for millenia, Kalash language vocabulary is remarkably closer to Sanskrit. A few examples will suffice.
Boy=Purush(gak) from Sanskrit. Purusha.
Brother= Baya (cf Sanskrit. Bhrata, cf Hindi Bhaiyya)
Child=Suda (from. Sanskrit Suta)
Day=Adua (cf. Sanskrit Adya, Hindi Aaj)
Milk=Chir (cf. Sanskrit Kshira)
Dance= Natim (cf. Sanskrit Natya)
Dog=Shoa (cf. Sanskrit Shva)
Cow=Gaak (from Gaav)
Shen=Bed (cf. Sanskrit Shayana)
hoof/foot=Khur (cf. Sanskrit Khura)
Ram= Mesh (from Sanskrit Mesha).
Village=Grom (from sanskrit grama)
Tears= Ashtru ( from sanskrit ashru)
Tooth= Dand (from sanskrit danta)
Fire/charcoal=Angar ( from sanskrit angara)
Thumb= Angust ( from sanskrit angusti)
Calf= Batsha (from sanskrit vatsa)
Most Hindus do not know about Kalash and Nuristani people and their persecutions. Likewise, most Kalash themselves are unaware of any connection to Hindus. But their enemies knew better.
Muslim authors such as Baihaqi and Abul Fazl often referred to Kalash and Kafiristanis as 'Hindus'.
The proof of Hindu genocide can be found in Afghan Pashto language itself.
In Afghan language, there are genocidal songs against these Hindus. One such song reads-
"As long as Kafiristan exists, I cannot sleep in peace.
Let Kafiristan be destroyed and let it never be inhabited.
Go friend, go to Katar and bring me a Kafir maid"(euphemism form sεx slave)
What Muslim rulers from Timur to Babar to Akbar dreamt but could not accomplish was done by Afghan king Amir Abdur Rahman in 1895: The genocide of Kafiristanis.
However, he could not accomplish this genocide alone. He was aided politically, economically and militarily by British in this unholy task. More on this below.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This Portuguese "Saint" used to say that Indians were black and ugly "monsters whose sight is unbearable".
This colonialist destroyed many Hindu temples with his own hands. He wrote many letters to the Portuguese king advocating for inquisition in Goa. He was thus directly responsible for Goan inquisition which kiIIed thousands of Hindus and some Jews.
According to Francis Xavier, Indian women were 'black and ugly monsters whose sight is unbearable'.
According to him, 'black and ugly Indian women' were unfit to be even Portuguese Concubines.
It is amazing that in 21st century, most visitors to his grave are Indian and 'Hindu' women.
[ Source: Celebrated Jesuits by William Harris Rule]
Portuguese forcibly converted many Hindu Dalit fishermen. Many of these converts used to worship Hindu Gods secretly.
When Francis Xavier came to know about this, he burnt the huts of these Dalit converts. This was a punishment for secretly worshiping Hindu deities.
This is false. She is deliberately using a CORRUPTED verse to defame Shri Rāma and Sita.
What the corrupted verse reads:
उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||
("I resided at my in laws for 12 years")
However, this corrupted verse (probably a medieval copyist's mistake) is present only in some southern manuscripts.
But in Maithili, Bengali, and Devaganagari as well as calcutta manuscripts of Valmiki Ramayana [N2 – V1 – B – D6-7], the verse reads as:
संवत्सरं चाध्युषिता इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||
("I resided at my in laws for 1 year")
Therefore, Devi Sita was 18-1=17 years old at the time of her wedding and NOT 6 years old as wrongly claimed below:
Here is what the authors and editors of Critical Edition of Valmiki Ramayana had to say:
After noticing the discrepancy between manuscripts, they come to the conclusion that staying at "one year" is not only attested to by many manuscripts(2 Nepali, 1 Maithili, 1 Bengali, Devanagari, Gorresio, Calcutta)
but that it also suits the context.
In Valmiki Ramayana (2.17.26 CE), Kausalya laments that Shri Rāma was just 17 years old at the time of exile [दश सप्त च वर्षाणि तव जातस्य राघव].
Let us assume for the sake of argument that exile happened 12 years after wedding.
This makes Shri Rāma just 5 years old at the time of wedding.
He underwent Upanayana (to be conducted at 11 years for Kṣatriyas according to Dharmaśāstras). He then completed his education. He then protected Vishvamitra's sacrifice by his physical prowess. Then broke Shiva's bow. And then married Sita.
All a boy of 5 years? The sheer absurdity of this entire argument!
In my thread, I showed that Sambhal disputed structure was originally a temple, which was not used as a Mosque until 19th century.
Denying all evidence, this apologist produces a painting of the disputed structure from 1789. He alleges the artist of this sketch depicted 'Jama Masjid of Sambhal'.
Is it true? Let us examine the evidence to see what the artist of the sketch himself had to say
Thread 🧵
The artist of this sketch was William Daniell. He and his uncle Thomas Daniell had toured India. Apart from the paintings, they also left a description of this structure.
Does the artist say the above structure is a Jama Mosque? The answer is an emphatic NO.
The artist says that in 1789, local Muslims called the structure "the grave of Babur".
To begin with. In Muslim religion, a grave is NOT a mosque. A grave is not a place fit for any sort of worship.
According to authentic Hadiths, Prophet Muhammad cursed the Jews and Christians for building places of worship at graves. Prophet clearly instructed Muslims not to construct Mosques at the graves and not to use graves of righteous men as places of worship.
Of course, a few ignorant and illiterate Muslims who are not well informed about their own religion do offer prayers at graves but that doesn't change the fact that a grave is not and cannot be a Mosque.
Muslims claim Sambhal is a historical "Mosque" built by Babur in 16th century.
This is FALSE. Babur did NOT build this mosque . It did not even exist until 19th century,
It was a Hindu temple until recently, before it was stolen by Muslims. Thread
Sambhal has been in the news:
Muslims & Liberals have argued that Sambhal is a historical Mosque built by Babur. That it should thus be protected under the places of worship act 1991.
This is TOTALLY false. Sambhal Mosque was NOT built by Babur. It is a recent usurpation.
Sambhal holds great religious significance for Hindus. As great as Ayodhya & Mathura.
In the Mahabharata (3.189), it is mentioned that God Vishnu will take birth in Sambhala as Kalki. Kalki is the future avatara of Vishnu.
Skanda Purana mentions a Vishnu temple in Sambhala.
The Pushyamitra who allegedly destroyed Buddhist temples was NOT a Hindu king.
According to same story, he was a Buddhist. He was NOT Pushyamitra Sunga. Rather, he was Pushyamitra Maurya. A great grandson of Buddhist emperor Ashoka!
This year, Diwali and Halloween coincided on the same day. But is there more to this 'coincidence'? Since Indian and Western calendars differ, their corresponding dates vary.
Yet, both Hallowen and Diwali occur at the same time. End of Harvest season and beginning of winter. In many regions of India, Diwali coincides with the end of a harvesting season known as the Kharif.
Likewise, Halloween occurs exactly at the end of Harvest season and the beginning of winter. This is traditionally October 31/November 1 on Western calendar.
Halloween originated as a festival in the British Isles before its importation to US. It has roots in Hallowtide and Samhain. As such, it is a very ancient pagan festival which was subsequently Christianized and commercialized.