One of the largest concerns with the mRNA gene therapy was its cancer risk—yet Pfizer was exempted from testing for it. Since then, we've seen many signs these vaccines cause aggressive cancers. Recently, a Medicaid whistleblower showed us cancer rates went up 2.5 times. A🧵
The complete data Kirsch received from the Medicaid whistleblower can be viewed below. In addition to being statistically significant, it also showed only specific cancers increased, and many of those were the highly aggressive cancers. kirschsubstack.com/p/turbo-cancer…
Right before Pfizer's vaccine hit the market, its regulatory documents were leaked. I immediately checked what they said for the required cancer, autoimmunity and fertility studies. Remarkably, none had been done. I took this as a tacit admission the real data was very bad.
Once they came out, numerous people I knew began having unusual new cancers or old cancers suddenly come back—many of which were fatal. One young non-smoker had a stable lipoma begin growing which had a very rare lung cancer within it. Another got a sarcoma where he was vaxxed.
Before long, data emerged showing we had a huge cancer problem. Nonetheless, the "experts" insisted we were imagining things. Contrast that, for example, with this chart @EthicalSkeptic has been continually updating since this tragedy began.
In tandem to this, research began emerging showing the mRNA spike protein impaired the repair of damaged DNA and concentrated in the nucleus. Rather than heed this red flag, the NIH got the paper retracted. Arkmedic discusses the scale of this crime here: arkmedic.info/p/welcome-to-g…
In parallel to this, a vast multi-million dollar "non-profit" campaign was deployed where many fake "experts" were deployed to defame, ban and delicense anyone who questioned the safety or efficacy of the vaccines. Recently we exposed who funded them. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-vast-pha…
However, no amount of gaslighting or wishful thinking can change what's happening, and now major publications are being forced to cover this "mysterious" increase in cancers.
•
• nature.com/articles/d4158… dailymail.co.uk/health/article…
One peer reviewed study found this epidemic has only hit the richer countries (and not say Africa). This mirrors the WHO's "inexplicable" discovery that COVID death rates were the highest in the countries that followed the WHO's costly pandemic policies. acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/ca…
Most recently, a peer-reviewed Japanese study found that a significant rise in cancer deaths occurred directly in parallel to the mRNA vaccination of Japan. cureus.com/articles/19627…
In the face of this data, the dam is breaking and the mainstream media is beginning to allow publication of articles which touch upon this inexplicable rise of cancer. Consider for instance this recent OP-Ed by @PierreKory realclearhealth.com/blog/2024/04/2…
However, all of this still dances around the real issue. We witnessed the greatest regulatory failure in history, and each time concerning evidence came out, they didn't listen and just covered it up. Those officials are now now employed by the manufacturers. This has to stop.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A recent survey yield an unexpected result—a strong association between vaccination and gender dysphoria.
A followup found 80% of it could be attributed to vaccination. Additionally, I found data suggesting it changed intimate relationships (e.g., how men connect to women). A🧵
There's been a longstanding embargo on any type of research evaluating the effects of vaccination on our children. Yet, when researchers can study them (as shown in this article), the vaccinated are 2-10X as likely to have the common childhood diseases. midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-dam…
Steve Kirsch was recently able to conduct a large survey which found these results, and also was validated by outside statistician. It found vaccination produced a 6.9X increase in "sexual orientation issues." kirschsubstack.com/p/new-survey-c…