Amal Saad Profile picture
May 7 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Thread: It's hard to believe that Israel can afford to snub the US sponsored cease-fire proposal that Hamas has accepted. While this remains a very real possibility given Israel's increasingly irrational behaviour, another scenario is also possible 1/
It could well be that Netanyahu is scrambling to save face with a war-hungry Israeli public and burnish his genocidal credentials with his far-right partners, before he is forced into a humiliating cease-fire deal. Pounding Rafah and maximising civilian casualties while seizing key humanitarian crossings could well be a last ditch attempt to compensate for Israel's military failures 2/
There are precedents for this, such as in August 2006 when Israel reserved some of its heaviest bombardment of Lebanon in the last 24 hours before UN Resolution 1701, which ended hostilities, came into effect. Former Israeli PM, Ehud Barak, said at the time "It's time to do all we can to destroy as much as we can of the infrastructure in the next 12 or 13 hours." 3/
If however, Israel has indeed decided to defy the US' apparent wishes to end the war, we may well be entering a very critical stage of the conflict, where the likelihood of regional conflagration increases dramatically. This is especially the case if the Resistance Axis concludes that the US lacks either the will or the ability to restrain Israel's actions in Gaza 4/
For 7 months, the working assumption among members of the Axis has been that at some undefined but not too distant point, the US is going to force Israel to submit to a cease-fire. If the timeline for this war is seen as indefinite, then the red lines—the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and a significant weakening of Hamas —become imminent. 5/
Moreover, if the US is viewed as lacking either the will or the ability to restrain Israel's actions in Gaza, this will raise concerns that it will not restrain its actions in Lebanon either, making an Israeli attack on Lebanon also imminent. This could well spell an end to Hizbullah's "sub-threshold" response strategy 6/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amal Saad

Amal Saad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @amalsaad_lb

Apr 19
THREAD: Whether Israel's micro-drone strike against Iran was launched from inside Iran or from neighbouring countries, this very underwhelming response (which was essentially a repeat of similar strikes Israel has conducted over the past few years) demonstrates the following:
-that Iran's retaliatory strike succeeded in achieving short term, "immediate deterrence"
-that Israel's deterrence posture vis-a-vis its enemies has been considerably weakened
-that Israel's over-reliance on US military assistance has constrained its war-making 2/
-that Israel can no longer project an image of deterrence nor the more modest goal of restoring military prestige
-that neither overwhelming brute force against Palestinians (cumulative deterrence) nor underwhelming strikes against Iran (classical deterrence) have succeeded 3/
Read 4 tweets
Apr 15
THREAD: Iran and Hizbullah seem to have mastered the strategy of sub-threshold retaliation—a type of response that straddles the line between deterrence and escalation. 1/
This was demonstrated by Iran's recent strikes against Israel, as well as Hizbullah's strikes on Israel's Meron air intel base in January. Both of these strikes were responses to Israeli provocations in which it totally abandoned the previous rules of engagement 2/
Both responses appear to have been carefully calibrated to avoid a full-scale war in the region which Israel appears intent on achieving, while still sending a message of deterrence and capability. In this sense, they transcended "symbolic" strikes 3/
Read 6 tweets
Apr 14
THREAD: The region is entering uncharted territory where the previous strategic paradigm and rules of engagement no longer apply. From now on, any Israeli action will be met with a direct and collective response by the Axis. 1/
Regardless of what Israel does next, there is no going back to the status quo ante. This is no longer the Iran that just supports resistance movements with weapons and training. This is the Iran that directly engages in strikes against Israel. 2/
This is a new proactive phase of the Resistance Axis' "offensive defense" strategy, which was officially launched on October 8 when Hizbullah and later other Resistance Axis allies directly intervened in the conflict against Israel. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Apr 9
I don't think the US fully grasps how existential this war is for all the actors in the Resistance Axis. The Axis is aware that the war is existential for Israel but the converse isn't the case. The US' blindness to the existential stakes has dangerous policy implications 1/
These existential stakes are especially high for Hamas, Hizbullah and Iran, for whom a cease-fire would suffice to achieve a strategic victory.
The ability of Hizbullah and Hamas to survive a war and repel an Israeli invasion is a vindication of the "logic of resistance" 2/
If Israel can re-occupy land, then resistance is no longer viewed as effective or rational. Because Hizbullah and Hamas both owe their raison d'etre to resisting Israeli invasion, sustaining the logic of resistance becomes integral to the very existence of these groups 3/
Read 6 tweets
Apr 6
THREAD: Everyday racism cannot explain the deeper, systemic reason behind the Western world's indifference to the slaughter of over 40,000 Palestinians, including at least 13,000 children, compared to its outcry over the deaths of 6 white aid workers 1/
That reason is that Palestinians have been dehumanised by Israel to such an extent that it has normalised the creation of a new extra-legal category of Palestinians as less-than civilians. After 6 months of genocidal war, this category has become ingrained in the western mind 2/
The ease with which Israel has openly declared and waged genocide against Palestinians has served to erase their legal personality as protected civilians and turned them into "unlawful noncombatants", i.e. terrorist sympathisers of an "unlawful combatant" group, namely, Hamas 3/
Read 5 tweets
Apr 3
THREAD: The main reason the war appears to have no immediate end in sight is that Israel doesn't have a strategic vision that goes beyond the extermination of the Palestinian people, while the US lacks a realistic vision. 1/
As expressed by Israeli journalist Amos Harel, Netanyahu wants "perpetual war more than he wants total victory." This explains why the cease-fire talks keep hitting a brick wall, as well as Israel's adoption of a chaotic warfare strategy designed to regionalise the conflict 2/
For its part, the United States' strategic vision remains detached from reality, insisting on imposing regime change in Gaza despite Israel's inability to win the war and believing that continuous pressure on Hezbollah will force it to move its forces away from the border. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(