I'll give a proper answer to the critique. To steelman this argument, the neo-pagan sees Tolkien's "history as a long defeat" as a rallying cry of nihilism. After all, Gondor is but a shadow of Númenor. And it is all but explicitly said that the Age of Men will be lesser... 1/
But what the neo-pagan fails to see is the religion Tolkien's mythos is embedded in. Tolkien sees the strength of elves and men as fading to sin. So it is a very good thing, that the fate of the world does not lie in men! Tolkien meant his world for a Redeemer 2/
The neo-pagan sees the collapse of empire, the collapse of material glory. But Tolkien's story is a foreshadowing of our own story, the seeking of spiritual riches beyond this world. Just as Frodo cast the Ring into Mount Doom, so did Christ rise from the grave. 3/
The end of LOTR is not a weary call for another collapse. It is a call for greater heroes, greater triumphs. And as the times grow darker, so must stronger men ride out to meet them. Théoden was not a lesser son. He was a son who stood true when it mattered the most. 4/
And unlike Denethor, we are fortunate because we know we live in a time of victory. Christ has conquered over the grave. Death and Sauron has been defeated in the distant past! We only need to live by the example of those who have gone before us. That is the final test. end/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay, since so many people are having trouble understanding the political landscape of America in 2025, I’ll lay it all out—logic in full. Disaffected liberals, centrists, and moderates of all stripes take note, this is why white America is done with you.
The Post-WW2 consensus, the foundation of all of America’s current political woes, sold white Americans on a narrative that the worst sin was racism and that this country was held back from the secular liberal utopia by the irrational bigotry and hatred of white Americans. /2
This led to the Civil Rights Act, a spoken and unspoken contract in our society that made it illegal for whites to collectivize on any grounds based on identity. Among other things, people assumed that banning “discrimination” would fix the black community’s problems. /3
I was skimming an indie novel, and I was struck by how scenes with heavy action still bored me to death. Action is good, but action that reveals character is 100x better.
For example, go to Cowboy Bebop. The slippery way Spike fights tells the viewer everything about him. 1/
What separates the amateurs from the masters is to be able to do three or four things at once with the same scene. Action should usually be accompanied by an insight, an idea to underscore, or a new aspect of a character. This is why the fights in FMAB are immaculate. 2/
Some people enjoy fights because of mechanics, and I would argue this is another dimension to consider. But your ability to make these interesting is like trying to write a good detective story. Your goal is to do unexpected things within a constrained ruleset. 3/
I believe that the future direction of the book industry is trending towards maximalist, highly detailed book covers. At least, for those indies who wish to remain competitive in an oversaturated market.
Here’s some tips on cover art and how to stand out from AI slop. /1
Here’s a cover I whipped up with AI until I can commission a proper one from an artist. It’s decent and it gets the proper vibe across.
However, there are a few problems. The guy has two hoods. The city has blurry details, and the picture gets worse the longer you squint. /2
Here’s the thing about AI. It can generate an image with two or three key ideas. Any more than that, and the generators flat out break. And even in good shots, you see tons of AI errors if you look long enough. And these generators can’t create images they aren’t trained on. /3
Some thoughts on what I think destroys modern writers.
The first and foremost is that writers view their stories as an expression of a product and not vision. This leads writers to treat tropes and the fantastical as commodities at a store rather than artistic intent. 1/
This leads to rampant homogenization where every setting has elves and dwarves and a thousand kinds of dragon, but without anything really being said through the setting. You have authors writing 150 page histories, and it all feels the same. 2/
Which leads to my next point. Authors emphasize complexity as the highest virtue. Everyone loves to clown on Martin, but everyone still wants to write the next ASOIAF. Endless detail and history is anathema to storytelling—which is the concise presentation of detail. 3/
An interesting trend @KingEmprPenguin noted was the rise of movies and television that were meta-commentaries on other stories. They only made sense when a person was inundated with all the tropes. Now I’m not saying this is bad in practice, in fact, Megamind is an example… 1/
of a story I quite like that falls in this category. But the whole hero stops being a hero and handing the city to the villain only makes sense where tropes exist independently of their bearing in reality. It only makes sense when heroes and villains are morally immaterial. /2
The tropes exist in-universe, and are roles that are filled by a cosmic order as larger than life figures larp as good guys and bad guys. Now Megamind is saved because it plays its real villain straight and doesn’t try to deconstruct everything. /3
Indiana Jones was a product of its time. His ideals of putting the whole of human history in a museum could only spring up in liberal fantasy.
But history has not ended. The past is still alive, and these symbols move among us just as they did thousands of years ago.
The brilliance of Indiana Jones has always been the acknowledgement that the past has real power, and this creates a contradictory tug and pull as Indiana regularly encounters the supernatural, only to see it stuffed away at the final moment.
What’s the first movie’s answer to finding a “Conduit to God”? Shove it in a warehouse and hope science can rationalize it later. Ironically, the Nazis were more correct in their thinking, even though they got splattered. How long can something like that be locked away?