Prof Adam Finn on Radio 4’s Today programme (@BBCr4today):

“We’re in a very different place with almost everyone in the population immune to SARS-CoV-2...”

This statement is incredibly poor public health messaging. Here’s a quick thread of reasons why…

🧵
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why is it that, as recently as mid-December 2023, 1 in every 24 people across the whole of England were infected with Covid?

If we’re all so ‘immune’, surely such high waves of Covid shouldn’t be happening repeatedly?

gov.uk/government/sta…
Image
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why do the scientific studies show that people infected with the Omicron variant (& its many sub-variants) have very little natural immunity boost against future Covid infections?

imperial.ac.uk/news/237315/om…
Image
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why does very recent research on the currently circulating JN.1 Covid variant show that protection against reinfection rapidly declines to just 50% after 6-9 months & is down to negligible levels after one year?



(H/t @ejustin46) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Image
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why have there been nearly 4.5 THOUSAND registered Covid deaths just in the first 17 weeks of 2024?
Image
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why is Yale School of Public Health telling us that growing research shows that Covid infections can have a lasting detrimental effect on people’s immune systems, making them more susceptible to other opportunistic infections?
Image
The really concerning thing is that Prof Adam Finn is a key member of the JCVI, the committee which decides who does and doesn’t get offered a Covid vaccine… Image
Prof Finn has stated in the past (before the Autumn booster):

“There's no real value in investing a lot of time & effort immunising them again.”

He’s made it clear that the UK’s strategy is a ‘get infected to protect against getting infected’ strategy.

bbc.co.uk/news/health-66…
Image
Let me translate:

The stated aim is to get infected over & over & over again… to protect against getting infected over & over & over again!

How does this make any sense at all when there are vaccines available? Image
It also seems to be a direct contradiction of what Prof Chris Whitty said recently (in November 2023) at the Covid Inquiry:

“The ONE situation… that you would ever aim to achieve herd immunity is BY VACCINATION. That is the ONLY situation that is a rational policy response.”
Worse still, it turns out that the government would rather throw away the vaccines they’ve ALREADY BOUGHT (with taxpayers money), rather than using them to protect people…

…and so millions of doses have tragically been destroyed.

You can read more about that in this thread ⬇️
For the Spring 2024 booster campaign, the *same* cost-effectiveness methodology was used, with the same fundamental flaws.

Aspects ignored in analysis include:
▪️Long Covid in non-hospitalised patients
▪️Primary care costs
▪️Infection control in hospitals
▪️Workplace absences Image
One of the key aspects that has been left out of the cost-effectiveness analysis is the impact of Long Covid in NON-hospitalised patients…

…despite studies which tell us that Long Covid strikes after MILD initial symptoms in ~90% of cases.

fortune.com/2023/01/05/ori…
Image
We also know that Covid vaccination dramatically lowers the risk of Long Covid.

“A meta-analysis of 24 studies found that people who had received 3 doses of Covid vax were 68.7% less likely to develop Long Covid compared with those who were unvaxxed.”

scientificamerican.com/article/vaccin…
Image
Meanwhile, 2 MILLION people are now suffering from Long Covid across England & Scotland.

That’s a massive 3.3% of the entire population.

Over 380,000 people reported that their daily activities were SEVERELY impacted by their Long Covid illness.

ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
Image
30% of these people currently affected by Long Covid have been suffering for under a year.

It’s clear that this is NOT just a legacy problem from the early waves of the pandemic.

With each new wave of Covid infections, more & more people are succumbing to Long Covid… Image
Multiple studies show that the risk of Long Covid increases with each subsequent infection.

This study from @StatCan_eng showed that the risk of developing Long Covid is:

▪️15% after 1 infection

▪️25% after 2 infections

▪️38% after 3+ infections - that’s 1 in 2.6 people!
Image
And this study from Prof. Al-Aly (@zalaly) also clearly demonstrated that the risk of developing Long Covid symptoms increases with each successive reinfection.

Just because you’ve had Covid before & were fine, it doesn’t mean you’ll be fine next time…

nature.com/articles/s4159…
Image
With no mitigations to reduce the spread of Covid, we keep getting infected again & again.

But reinfections are NOT harmless.

Each infection is a game of Covid Roulette as to whether you’ll end up with long-term health repercussions.

time.com/6553340/covid-…
Image
Many people may think they’ve fully recovered from their Covid infection…

…but this is a virus which causes untold damage below the surface…

…and the full impact of the longer term ‘silent’ organ damage may not become apparent for several years.

rsm.ac.uk/media-releases…
Image
A recent study found that people who caught Covid were 5x more likely to die from heart disease in the 18 months after infection.

As of June 2023, there had been nearly 100,000 more deaths than usual attributed to heart problems since the pandemic began.

bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/new…
Image
One of the aspects I’m most concerned about is the long-term damage which Covid can cause to the brain.

We now know that Covid infection can lead to a plethora of new neurological symptoms, including confusion, difficulty concentrating, memory problems, depression & anxiety.
All this is leading to a BIG problem…

As Prof Danny Altmann (@Daltmann10) wrote in this paper:

“The oncoming burden of long COVID faced by patients, health-care providers, governments and economies is so large as to be unfathomable…”

nature.com/articles/s4157…
Image
Cambridge Econometrics have done some important analysis into the economic burden of Long Covid in the UK through to 2030…

If prevalence of Long Covid increases to 4 million people by 2030, this would lead to:
▪️a reduction of 2.7 BILLION in GDP
▪️311k job losses PER YEAR.
Image
To anyone paying attention, none of this should come as a surprise...

When you mass infect a population with a disease which, according to the World Health Organisation, causes long-term chronic illness in around 10% of infections, then this is the inevitable consequence.
Experts have predicted for several years that Long Covid would lead to a tsunami of disability.

Our government ignored those warnings and now we must all face the consequences...







scientificamerican.com/article/a-tsun…
nytimes.com/2021/03/17/opi…
insurancebusinessmag.com/ca/news/breaki…
salon.com/2024/01/20/liv…
Image
It’s time to stop brushing Covid and Long Covid under the carpet.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

We could be doing SO much more to reduce the spread of infections and halt the gradual decline in the health of our nation & economy.

Here’s my Top 10 Covid mitigation wishlist ⬇️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cat in the Hat 🐈‍⬛ 🎩 🇬🇧

Cat in the Hat 🐈‍⬛ 🎩 🇬🇧 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_CatintheHat

Mar 22
MENINGITIS B TRANSMISSION

There’s been a lot of discussion online and in the media about how exactly Meningitis B spreads.

A lot of it is conflicting & confusing.

So let’s put opinions & hearsay aside and take a proper look at what the latest science actually tells us…

🧵 Image
The UK National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) states that bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease is transmitted by the following 3 modes:

▪️ aerosol
▪️droplets
▪️direct contact

cks.nice.org.uk/topics/meningi…Image
The first of these modes of transmission, AEROSOL, has been the subject of heated debate.

Let’s look at why…

Notice the second line:

“Transmission usually requires either frequent or prolonged close contact.”

At first, this may seem contradictory with aerosol transmission… Image
Read 22 tweets
Mar 19
COVID INQUIRY: MODULE 3 REPORT

“Fundamental flaws in the UK’s approach to IPC [infection prevention & control] guidance, for example in relation to the use of PPE, put patients and healthcare workers at risk.”

— Baroness Hallett, Chair of the Covid Inquiry

Read more here… ⬇️
These are the words we were all hoping to hear:

“Initial guidance on preventing the spread of infection was flawed. It assumed the virus was spread by contact transmission, failing properly to consider the extent to which it was also spread by AIRBORNE transmission.” Image
But it wasn’t just the “initial guidance” that was flawed!

To this very day, the IPC guidance STILL does not reflect the latest science on AIRBORNE transmission.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 18
Last week, CATA released two explosive reports which revealed a scandal of monumental proportions.

Flawed decisions were made at the start of the Covid pandemic - and then covered up for years to come.

In this series of videos, @SafeDavid3 talks us through the key findings…
The CATA Executive team have worked tirelessly in their pursuit of the truth, forensically analysing over 17,000 Covid Inquiry documents & submitting countless FOI requests.

Concerningly, they discovered around 100 key emails which have not been disclosed to the Covid Inquiry…
Their report explores 7 separate occasions when the IPC Cell was challenged re: the adequacy of its guidance on respiratory protection for healthcare workers.

This included challenges from PHE/UKHSA, Chief Nursing Officers & even the CMO.

Each time, concerns were brushed aside.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 16
In honour of #LongCOVIDAwarenessDay, I’d like to present some important data from the latest GP-Patient survey.

This is a HUGE survey with a sample size of ~700K people in England (5x bigger than ONS’s Covid survey).

In this thread, I’ll walk you through some key findings…

/1 Image
According to the GP-Patient survey:

🚨4.2% of people say they DO have Long Covid. That equates to around 2.3M people in England.

🚨A further 9.5% (~5.3M) say they ‘don’t know’.

So potentially as many as 7.6M people in England either have Long Covid or suspect they might.

/2 Image
The fact that 9.5% of people said they “don’t know” if they have long Covid is actually not surprising.

It’s a HUGE number of people who suspect something isn’t right but don’t have clarity…

…and once you think about how Covid is diagnosed, it makes perfect sense.

/3
Read 23 tweets
Mar 14
CATA's reports are a truly remarkable piece of forensic investigation & took literally YEARS to put together.

The fact it’s taken so long is a fundamental part of the story.

For example: it took a whopping 27 MONTHS to extricate one document from the DHSC via an Fol request... Image
And it took 17 MONTHS to elicit a set of draft minutes from IPC Cell meetings which took place in Dec 2020 - and only following a direct order by the ICO.

This doc is one of the most damning pieces of evidence in the report as it reveals how minutes were fundamentally altered. Image
PHE & UKHSA have been similarly obstructive in providing information in a timely fashion.

The statutory requirement of FoIs is to provide the info requested within 20 working days…

…but it took over 300 WORKING DAYS (roughly 14 MONTHS) to finally extricate one key document. Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 10
In 2023, the British Council for Offices (BCO) updated the ventilation guidance for offices:

💨 The *minimum* recommended ventilation rate was increased from 12 to 14 litres of outdoor air per sec per person.

Now guess what the ventilation rate is in a typical UK classroom…❓ Image
Since 2022, the Schools Air quality Monitoring for Health & Education (SAMHE) project has monitored indoor air quality in hundreds of schools across the UK.

Shockingly, their data revealed that the ventilation rate in a typical UK classroom is just 5.3 litres per sec per person. Image
Worse still, the data shows the average ventilation rate plummets to just 3.8 litres per sec per person in colder weather.

Now compare this to the MINIMUM recommended ventilation rate for offices of 14 litres per sec per person.

Schools are achieving just a fraction of this! Image
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(