If we’re all so ‘immune’, why do the scientific studies show that people infected with the Omicron variant (& its many sub-variants) have very little natural immunity boost against future Covid infections?
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why does very recent research on the currently circulating JN.1 Covid variant show that protection against reinfection rapidly declines to just 50% after 6-9 months & is down to negligible levels after one year?
If we’re all so ‘immune’, why is Yale School of Public Health telling us that growing research shows that Covid infections can have a lasting detrimental effect on people’s immune systems, making them more susceptible to other opportunistic infections?
The really concerning thing is that Prof Adam Finn is a key member of the JCVI, the committee which decides who does and doesn’t get offered a Covid vaccine…
Prof Finn has stated in the past (before the Autumn booster):
“There's no real value in investing a lot of time & effort immunising them again.”
He’s made it clear that the UK’s strategy is a ‘get infected to protect against getting infected’ strategy.
The stated aim is to get infected over & over & over again… to protect against getting infected over & over & over again!
How does this make any sense at all when there are vaccines available?
It also seems to be a direct contradiction of what Prof Chris Whitty said recently (in November 2023) at the Covid Inquiry:
“The ONE situation… that you would ever aim to achieve herd immunity is BY VACCINATION. That is the ONLY situation that is a rational policy response.”
Worse still, it turns out that the government would rather throw away the vaccines they’ve ALREADY BOUGHT (with taxpayers money), rather than using them to protect people…
…and so millions of doses have tragically been destroyed.
For the Spring 2024 booster campaign, the *same* cost-effectiveness methodology was used, with the same fundamental flaws.
Aspects ignored in analysis include:
▪️Long Covid in non-hospitalised patients
▪️Primary care costs
▪️Infection control in hospitals
▪️Workplace absences
One of the key aspects that has been left out of the cost-effectiveness analysis is the impact of Long Covid in NON-hospitalised patients…
…despite studies which tell us that Long Covid strikes after MILD initial symptoms in ~90% of cases.
We also know that Covid vaccination dramatically lowers the risk of Long Covid.
“A meta-analysis of 24 studies found that people who had received 3 doses of Covid vax were 68.7% less likely to develop Long Covid compared with those who were unvaxxed.”
And this study from Prof. Al-Aly (@zalaly) also clearly demonstrated that the risk of developing Long Covid symptoms increases with each successive reinfection.
Just because you’ve had Covid before & were fine, it doesn’t mean you’ll be fine next time…
One of the aspects I’m most concerned about is the long-term damage which Covid can cause to the brain.
We now know that Covid infection can lead to a plethora of new neurological symptoms, including confusion, difficulty concentrating, memory problems, depression & anxiety.
To anyone paying attention, none of this should come as a surprise...
When you mass infect a population with a disease which, according to the World Health Organisation, causes long-term chronic illness in around 10% of infections, then this is the inevitable consequence.
It looks like the World Health Organisation are about to come up with alternative terminology for ‘airborne transmission’ in an attempt to save face after denying that Covid was airborne for so long.