Problem with conspiratorial thinking isn’t the sense that those in power are screwing you over, but the diagnosis that it’s being done in a personal way. People love to imagine a cabal of horrors at the top when the reality is that’s an easier issue to solve than what we’ve got.
It’s the more banal evils of the bureaucracy, the creeping “norms” of a self-referential circle of thousands of orgs, schools, networks, all made up of former students who mostly said yes to teacher as teacher taught them more and more insane and radical things - that is our problem. It’s a web, a class with interests, all of the above. Not a cabal. A cabal would be what, a few dozen at most? No, this is 10% of the population or more. It’s organic “collaboration” that springs from unacknowledged but common premises in worldview.
The problem with conspiratorial thinking isn’t that it makes the right people clutch their pearls in horror, it’s that it lends itself to “just get my guy in and the problem will be solved” mentality. “One weird trick” mentality. Any real victory requires battling a hydra on multiple fronts in an intelligent way, and conspiratorial thinking is often a detriment to the ability to do this effectively.
I’ve already said too much on this subject so I will condense to this: you’re not battling a cabal of powerful, evil actors, you’re battling the phrase “best practices”.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, the Biden admin is releasing regulations more powerful than most real legislation. His Title IX changes:
- Redefine sex in civil rights law to include gender identity, exposing girls and women across the country to men in their bathrooms, sports teams, and locker rooms
- Reinstate Obama-era kangaroo court rules for men accused of sexual assault on college campuses that completely flout due process and make mere accusation the standard that can ruin young men’s lives
- Encourage universities to unconstitutionally curtail protected speech in the name of subjective offense and “harassment”; empower schools to enforce rules like punishing children for using biologically incorrect pronouns
- Curtail parents’ rights to know what schools are doing with their own children with regard to “gender transition”
Each one of these changes itself would be a five-alarm fire, and in many cases represent unconstitutional curtailment of established rights, rights federal courts have consistently upheld. These changes will be challenged in court. But it’s a good reminder of the enormous power of bureaucracy to massively change American law and curtail all of our rights overnight.
Not being one myself, I’m honestly offended on behalf of the Christian moral majority of the 90s because the people who styled themselves “rational” and “data-driven” have reacted to the MM basically being right about the direction of everything by doubling down on contempt.
The “rational, data-driven” reaction to being completely wrong is to reconsider why people you thought were drooling morons got it right. But instead the reaction is still a status game of separating yourself from the icky mouthbreathers (who were right while you were wrong).
Having watched this long interview, I think Tucker did a decent job. He let Putin talk & talk but this is his interview style (not a great one imho for this reason). Tucker’s Qs were challenging, not obsequious. More thoughts on the substance of Putin’s answers when I have time.
There’s value in Americans listening to this version of history, but unfortunately not in their current state of knowing none of their own. Like zoomers reading the Bin Laden letter and nodding along. Fortunately, the average American fell asleep 15 mins in. Still, an act of journalism.
For those who know at least a bit about WWII, I ask that you apply your incredulous response to Putin on that subject (Poles started WWII?) to the rest of his historical fantasies.
A dispatch from idiot island, where the people who are still triple masking rule and liberal women who drove off their husbands hold sway, follows:
My husband and I thought, after the sad natural passing of our wonderful, missed, and very elderly dog, that we would get a new kitten to keep our middle-aged cat company. And there are hundreds of stray cats and kittens all over NYC, so like two naive people, we thought doing the good deed of giving one of them a good home was going to be easy.
We are both cat people, both had cats our whole lives. We have a nice little apartment by city standards. So when we went down to one of the pet supply stores and saw a cute little guy about 6 months old, we applied to take him home, especially since we’d seen the same cats in the store for months. How sad, we thought, no one wants them!
It is observably true. Our guarantee was +200 pts or $ back, I never once had to issue the refund w 100s of students. The SAT is a completely bankrupt test devoid of any of its 90s and prior content. The right here is just defending the skin suit of a long-hollowed out thing.
I know “studies say” (many of them done on previous iterations of the test) but I’m sorry in this case I believe my years of direct experience. The SAT is eminently gameable and teachable.
Pls send ur kids to take @CLT_Exam instead, and judge the worthiness of the colleges they’re trying to enter by whether or not they accept that test