Here's how I prove the Protests, especially right here in Portland are an Op, the same one we dealt with a few years ago, The word ACAB. We also see the 'CHOP' type 'Zone', the Umbrellas, Anarchists and the 'Red House' crowd and they have changed the narrative over to Boeing, imagine that. They are holding Portland State hostage but it is not a large group. I believe the Police will deal with them at some point today, I just ask they do not use Riot Gear, it will trigger them.
Y'all are missing the point about what the Hur report really said.
Like Durham, he was supposed to find crimes on Biden but instead, he got personal (a big no-no), which will hurt him down the road, and told us about Trump's crimes that DO rise to a crime, he mentioned Trump's actions should be criminally adjudicated.
Let's not forget that Hur was chosen by Trump and the Freedom Caucus, Garland obliged them because he knew the truth. Biden did not commit any crimes that rise to the level of High Crimes and Misdemeanors but he pointed out that trump did.
Hur compared the 2 cases
Dear Maga
Page 11
The exception is former President Trump. It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr. Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would present serious aggravating facts. Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with the investigation. In reaching our decision, we did not consider every circumstance m which criminal charges against a former president or vice president for mishandling classified information may be warranted. But on the facts of this case, "the fundamental interests of society" do not "require" criminal charges against Mr. Eiden.~ For this additional reason, applying the Principles of Federal Prosecution set forth in the Justice Manual, we decline prosecution.