(THREAD) It’s important that everyone RETWEET this thread. As some of you know, Elon Musk has been on a deranged tear trying to destroy one of the most reliable news sources in the world, REUTERS. The recent reports in this thread are the ones Musk doesn’t want *anyone* to share.
6/ REUTERS is publishing so many devastating reports on Musk in quick succession that it’s reasonable to wonder whether a whistleblower inside Musk’s operation is involved. Certainly, Musk has recruited a troll army here at Twitter to try to discredit REUTERS’ accurate reporting.
8/ REUTERS: In Tesla Autopilot Probe, American Prosecutors Focus on Securities Fraud and Wire Fraud reuters.com/business/autos…
9/ It seems clear from these recent REUTERS reports that REUTERS believes—as I do, and as I think Americans broadly writ increasingly do—that Elon Musk is one of the most dishonest men alive, and quite possibly one of the most dangerous to the continuation of our civilization.
12/ I’ve been researching Musk in contemplation of a book on the man for over a year—and will soon publish at PROOF a report on his adoption of an extremely dangerous, deranged bundle of ideas known as TESCREALism.
Very few people understand how far off the deep end Musk is now.
15/ How the hell does a single news service, REUTERS, get *so many* damning exclusives about Elon Musk over just a several-week period? I’ve no idea. I suspect Musk has no idea, either. Which is why he’s desperately trying to napalm one of the most reliable news sources on Earth.
16/ REUTERS: Elon Musk’s Tesla Overhaul Hits the Very ‘Executive Bench’ He Once Touted reuters.com/business/autos…
17/ REUTERS: Tesla Threatened to Fire Law Firm in Bid to Block a Critic of Elon Musk’s Compensation Package reuters.com/legal/transact…
18/ Many Twitter users have been saying that they would like to see Maggie Haberman—recently revealed as little more than a Donald Trump stenographer—return her Pulitzer Prize. I’ve no opinion on that, but if it does get returned, can it be given to REUTERS for its Musk coverage?
19/ REUTERS: Tesla Plans to Cut 600+ More Jobs in California, Notice to Government Says reuters.com/technology/tes…
20/ REUTERS: Tesla Strike in Sweden Heats Up As Nation’s Largest Union Joins Fray reuters.com/business/autos…
21/ These are all *recent* reports. They raise questions:
(i) Are there *any* Musk companies that are *not* flailing?
(ii) How many lawsuits is Musk now the target of?
(iii) How many state and federal investigations is Musk the target of?
(iv) Why does *anyone* support this man?
23/ REUTERS: Australian Regulator Says Musk’s Twitter Should Not Set the Limits of Internet Law reuters.com/technology/aus…
24/ Given all these reports—including many reports on Musk’s use of drugs and bizarre public and private behavior—it’s no wonder that he’s being radicalized by far-right white supremacists in real time, and appears to be having some sort of mental breakdown.
27/ REUTERS may be the one indispensable news service in journalists’ ongoing fight to uncover the seemingly endless malfeasance of the world’s second-richest man. So him trying to destroy it is terrifying. Plus we see this idiocy from a Musk stooge he’s now gleefully amplifying:
28/ REUTERS: Reuters Wins Polk Award for Coverage of Elon Musk’s Business Empire
REUTERS has a Polk Award for this reporting; it deserves (another) Pulitzer beyond the ones it already has for this run of reporting on Musk.
29/ REUTERS: Musk Decision to Leave Knife Attack Video on Twitter Prompts Police Terror Warning reuters.com/world/asia-pac…
30/ If Musk doesn’t want you to see something, it’s probably not just 100% accurate but desperately important—and harrowingly damaging to him in a way he richly deserves. Please do go back and RETWEET the first tweet in this thread so the world can see the man for who he is. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: We now have a good idea of why Trump rushed to contact PBPD—one of the first to do so—when he learned Epstein was under investigation in 2007.
It was a CYA. Per his friend Lutnick, it was believed Epstein had blackmail on men he'd hung out with. usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
Trump knew Epstein was angry over the 2003 money-laundering deal Trump did with a Putin agent—stealing the property from Epstein—and knew Trump then dimed him out anonymously in 2003.
Trump figured if he got to PBPD fast, they'd think any videos of him Epstein offered were fake.
This maneuver by Trump is so old and so obvious that it's literally the focal point of perhaps the most famous scene in the most famous movie ever made.
The best part?
Trump flubbed his lines, telling PBPD that "everyone" knew what Epstein was doing.
(🚨) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Trump Personal Lawyers Bondi, Blanche, and Patel Hid From American Voters a *Minimum* of *95%* of All References to Donald Trump in the Epstein Files (950,000 of 1M+), Establishing the Largest Political Coverup in American History axios.com/2026/02/10/tru…
As a Trump biographer/presidential hisrorian who has written a book on Trump and Epstein establishing that the two operated distinct but mutually beneficial—sometimes interconnected—trafficking operations, I took guff for estimating Trump would appear in the Files 50,000+ times.
Critics said there was no way that was possible. So I want to do here what I know those critics won't and apologize. I low-balled how entwined Trump was with Epstein to a degree that is almost numerically difficult to express. They were even more joined at the hip than I thought.
Imagine being a 42 year-old pleading with a known pedophilic sex criminal to fly you to his island so you can party with girls he assures you will be 25 or younger.
Then imagine lying about it to hundreds of millions. Even after your lies are caught.
You don't hate Elon enough.
Instead of saying—as honor demands—"I made horrible mistakes for which there's no excuse, I'll take time away from public life to reflect on them," he's kept lying, attacked media, tried to distract, and obscenely said he worked harder than Epstein's victims to get the Files out.
Now imagine that this happens during the same 12-month period this man gleefully—without having any idea what he was doing, or even *caring* if he had any idea—cut a massive foreign aid program whose erasure is projected to cause *more than 10 million deaths* in the years ahead.
This major report on the Greg Bovino-to-Tom Homan handover in Minneapolis at once reveals that the Trump regime hasn’t changed its plans for ICE *and* serves as a primer on the many aspects of the criminal justice system Homan lied about today.
It can't be sufficiently emphasized that the Trump regime has at all points lied about every aspect of its immigration agenda, every aspect of how immigration enforcement works and every aspect of the justice system that touches upon immigration enforcement.
It's all a long con.
No one is saying that every American must understand the justice system.
That would be ideal, but it's impractical.
The problem is that our justice system lies at the center of our politics—which means ignorance about how it works is ripe for abuse by an authoritarian regime.
I shouldn't even have to say this, but precisely *no one* in the independent journalism sphere is saying that Trump can *legally* cancel the midterms.
So corporate media should put on its thinking cap and ask themselves what independent journalists *are* saying.
Yes.... *that*.
It's Month 1 of a 10-month plan and they're already illegally invading countries, illegally occupying U.S. cities, posting Nazi memes from government accounts almost daily, and publicly saying there should be no elections anymore. You think their plan is to do *anything* legally?
So I've no idea why corporate media keeps sanctimoniously reminding us of something we already know—that Trump can't *legally* cancel elections. Because that's not where the debate or mystery is now. The question is whether he thinks he can wait until 2028 to declare martial law.
The question media should be asking: if Minneapolis only needs 600 police officers to perform all general law enforcement activities in the city, why did Trump send 3,000 federal agents to execute a statutorily and constitutionally *much* smaller task?
Answer? He wanted a *war*.
Based on the size of the task and authority ICE actually has—merely executing judicial warrants for already-identified undocumented persons—we'd expect an ICE "surge" in Minneapolis to be about 100 agents.
Trump sent *30 times that*.
Because he wants to declare an insurrection.
So if you're an American paying only small attention to Minneapolis and wondering why things are crazy there, imagine *your* town being the target of an *unprecedented* federal op.
Big deal, right?
Now imagine the feds sending *30 times* too many men—most *virtually untrained*.