The European Union bans the broadcasting of four pro-Russian media outlets. Voice of Europe, RIA Novosti, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, and Izvestia. These media outlets spread misinformation to influence public opinion. According to Vice-President of the European Commission Věra
1/23
Jourová, “What we suspected is confirmed: the Kremlin uses dubious channels, posing as the media, and buys hidden influence with money. Moscow develop outlets, like Voice Of Europe, which pretend to be legitimate but then spew lies,” she said. Voice of Europe broadcast from
2/23
Prague and recently the Czech Information Security Service (BIS) released a huge investigation in which they uncovered a large network organized by Russia, which also tried to influence the elections to the European Parliament on June 6-9. The Czech site
3/23
writes about this. It became one of the largest exposed Russian influence operations in recent years. BIS began working on this case last spring, when the Voice of Europe website went live in the Czech Republic. Russians in Prague tried to influence
4/23 denikn.cz
European Parliament elections in Germany, France and Belgium. The main players in the network of influence were Viktor Medvedchuk and his close associate Artem Marchevsky. Former Ukrainian politician Viktor Medvedchuk, known as “Putin’s godfather,” currently lives in Moscow,
5/23
after he was detained in Ukraine and exchanged along with 55 Russian soldiers for 215 Ukrainians, including more than a hundred of Azovstal defenders. Currently sanctioned in the Czech Republic, the pro-Russian propagandist, a citizen of Ukraine and Israel, Artem Marchevsky,
6/23
who headed the Voice of Europe platform, received temporary protection in Slovakia after the Czech Ministry of Internal Affairs decided to revoke the Czech temporary protection visa that he received after the Russian aggression against Ukraine. The Slovak Ministry of
7/23
Internal Affairs does not yet intend to initiate a case against Marchevsky. They don't see him as a threat. The Voice of Europe website was influenced and financed from Moscow. The news site provided space for politicians who demand an end to EU aid to Ukraine and who spread
8/23
narratives favorable to Russia. According to BIS, hundreds of thousands of euros were paid out from Russia for these purposes in the last year alone. Some European politicians who collaborated with the media platform were paid for this. Some of their campaigns were financed
9/23
by money coming from Russia. Some politicians from Germany, France, Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands and Hungary were involved. The case involves the German far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD). The platform content is directed against Ukraine, migrants, LGBTQ,
10/23
the European Union and Muslims. Information from the site is widely disseminated by openly pro-Russian and Russian social media accounts such as TikTok and Facebook. French newspaper Le Monde reported in early March that the French counterintelligence agency DGSI has been
11/23
investigating a “pro-Russian campaign” ahead of the European Parliament elections since last fall. The information was received from the Czech secret service. French intelligence services are also monitoring the European Parliament campaign, which is led by the far-right
12/23
National Rally party, previously led by Marine Le Pen. Earlier, Russian politician Alexander Babakov helped them get a loan of nine million euros. Shortly after the publication of information about the exposure of the Russian network in the Czech Republic, the Polish
13/23
counterintelligence service ABW also announced that it had conducted searches during which it had seized almost 48,500 euros and $36,000. Network members wanted to lead pro-Russian initiatives and media campaigns in the EU to promote Russian policies. Money from Russia to
14/23
politicians in Europe flowed to the Czech Republic through Poland. This was announced by the Chairman of the Czech Parliamentary Security Committee Pavel Zacek. He was talking about hundreds of thousands and millions of euros. This is not support for the site or payment for
15/23
some kind of interview, it seems that the site is some kind of cover. Resources are aimed at creating a fifth column within the European Union. The money was intended for future aides and newly elected politicians in the European Parliament. The money was delivered to the
16/23
Czech Republic from Poland by couriers. At the same time, an investigation began in Poland against a Polish citizen suspected of spying for Russian intelligence services. He also allegedly bribed Polish and European parliamentarians in favor of Russian services. So it's not
17/23
just one channel. It is a network of different websites, social media pages and different platforms. The investigation carried out by the Czech intelligence services into the Russian network is of great concern, said Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. According to him, Dutch
18/23
intelligence services are also involved in the investigation. The Netherlands, like other EU member states, has decided not yet to publish the names of politicians who received money from Moscow. Before this, the President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, called
19/23
on EU leaders to be “on guard.” This comes after Latvian MEP Tatyana Zhdanoka was accused by the Russian independent newspaper Insider of spying for the Russian Federation based on leaked emails. The European Parliament subsequently launched a formal investigation. I would
20/23
like to add that in Estonia we also have a pro-Russian member of the European Parliament, Jana Toom. It is not yet known whether an investigation is being carried out against her, but I would like to believe that KaPo is looking into it. NATO Allies are deeply concerned
21/23
about recent malign activities on Allied territory, including those resulting in the investigation and charging of multiple individuals in connection with hostile state activity affecting Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and the United Kingdom.
22/23
The Estonian Security Police KaPo published a detailed report on Russian tactics and its influence in Europe in 2018, but it did not cause widespread resonance at the time.
23/23
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brussels has found a way to make decisions on blocking Russian assets without the consent of all EU member states, the Financial Times reports. This would allow the assets to be frozen indefinitely rather than having the blockade renewed every six months as is currently 1/9
the case. According to the publication, this is made possible by one of the EU treaty provisions stating that unanimous approval is not required in situations of economic shocks, which Brussels considers the war in Ukraine to be. Until now, when extending the freeze, there 2/9
was a risk that one EU country, for example Hungary, could oppose it, and without unanimous agreement the assets would be unfrozen. In early December, the European Commission approved two options for financing Ukraine for 2026 and 2027. The first plan involves providing 3/9
Russia is laying the groundwork to make the 1990s look like a walk in the park. Everyone says Russia is returning to the nineties, but what does that mean? The collapse of the Soviet Union was driven by many factors. Economic problems had already begun in the 1970s. The USSR
1/16
economy was built on the export of energy resources (oil and gas), metals, timber and grain. Most of the revenue went into the arms race of the Cold War. This is very similar to Russia today, whose military budget has reached record levels. The 1973 oil crisis initially
2/16
worked in the USSR's favor by increasing export revenues, but soon an event occurred that had a greater impact on the crisis of the 1990s than anything else - the war in Afghanistan. Although the Soviet Union spent about $20 billion on the war, this was negligible compared
3/16
US-Russia negotiations will not lead to peace. Diplomacy with Russia does not work and this truth is something the Trump administration refuses to see. The more we learn about the details of the US-Russia deal on Ukraine, the clearer it becomes that this administration 1/9
is pursuing only personal gain, both in the form of stakes in Russian business and in the form of a share of the frozen Russian assets whose unfreezing after a peace deal the US administration insists on. Russia is not striving for any peace and has never done so - this is 2/9
obvious to anyone who truly understands the issue. Russia uses the same old Soviet negotiation tactics that Kaja Kallas described when she quoted Andrei Gromyko. Three things: first demand the maximum. Do not ask but demand something that has never been yours. Secondly, 3/9
In mid-October, Putin introduced a moratorium on the cancellation of the fuel damper. This mechanism provides that if the export price of gasoline and diesel fuel is higher than the conditional domestic one, the state compensates companies for part of this difference. 1/8
It is intended to curb fuel prices, but prices continue to rise and have reached record highs not seen in the last 30 years. In September alone, oil companies received more than 30 billion rubles in compensation despite failing to keep their promises not to raise prices. 2/8
The reason is that Putin himself is also a beneficiary of oil companies through various schemes. These companies are the main source of his personal wealth and the financial backbone of Russia’s war machine, and he will keep them afloat at any cost. These payments are an 3/8
The new talks between Trump, Putin, and Zelensky are likely to end in yet another deadlock. This time, Putin has softened his illegal demands and is now “ready to give up” the Zaporizhzhia region in exchange for a ceasefire and control over the rest of Donetsk region. These
1/16
“concessions” have probably signaled to Trump that Putin is ready for negotiations, and that maybe, finally, he can strike a peace deal and get his long-coveted Nobel Prize - since it didn’t work out with Israel, where Hamas opened fire again. The White House rhetoric has
2/16
once again shifted sharply, from “Tomahawks are already on their way to Kyiv” to “Donbas should be Russian.” It’s the same old Kremlin ploy - when things go badly, start pushing for negotiations. All this commotion began after Putin’s call with Trump and has now turned into
3/16
In Russia, a new wave of hatred toward Chechens is flaring up - and this time, the reason seems surprisingly harmless: a Central Bank vote to choose the image for a new 500-ruble banknote. Yet another attempt by the authorities to distract from economic and social problems
1/12
has unexpectedly exposed deep-seated interethnic tensions that have been smoldering in the country for decades. Two options emerged as frontrunners in the online voting: Mount Elbrus and the Grozny City business center - a symbol of the modern Chechen capital. In the region
2/12
itself, the campaign has taken on the character of a national project: authorities, schools, hospitals, and military units have been organized to participate. The process is personally supervised by Ramzan Kadyrov and his administration. This activity provoked a stormy
3/12