Actually I do know why. Here’s the completely amoral argument for why homosexuality can’t be tolerated. Bees build hives and farm honey, wolves hunt ruminants in packs, men cooperate in groups to dominate other men and their surroundings.
In order to defeat other groups of men, in order to win, men need the desire to fuck others over, but simultaneously to not fuck their friends over. Women, whose psychology is built around being fucked, and men who want to be fucked, disrupt this dynamic.
The most sublime and beautiful emotions in the male psyche exist around loyalty to friends and victory over the enemy. If a man wants to fuck his friends, be fucked by them, or be fucked by the enemy, all of these motivating glories get poisoned and inverted…
…and the cohesion of the group, its ability to win, falls apart. The distinction between the active and passive homosexual seems relevant here, and most societies made the distinction. If one only wants to (literally) fuck the enemy, cooperation doesn’t immediately break down.
Every society that tolerated some gay quarantined male on male buttsex to a subordinate caste of catamites considered subhuman. The recipient could not participate in male society, and the “top” would be excluded if he ever took it in the ass.
The problem is that the boyraper can’t keep his buttrayp to the towel boys, and he starts molesting the sons of his fellow elites, turning them into homos. This spreads through subsequent generations until the elite reaches a critical mass of homos and its cohesion collapses.
See: British boarding schools in the 1800s. This is possible because homosexual courtship is always an inversion of male bonding and initiation rituals. The group of friends partying together -> nightclub orgies. Mentor and student -> grooming and boyrayp
Male bonding and initiation rituals are necessary for elite cohesion and cooperation. Introducing any element of homosexuality into them (and there is no inherent eroticism at all in them to a healthy man) completely destroys them via mechanism I mentioned above.
Every degree of toleration eventually destroys the society that tolerates it; it breaks quarantine sooner or later. Only the German “ergi -> swamp” successfully managed to extirpate it from northern Europe and keep it out until relatively recent times.
Anyway this is orthogonal to question about “our public sphere” which isn’t at all capable of cohesive action in the first place, but bullying the transformers is fun and reflects important instincts, it’s not moralism, so we’re not going to stop
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This isn’t 1850 and we’re not going to the fainting couch because deuteronomy says “thou shalt not dress in drag” or whatever. The presence of homos is acid for male cohesion and any space we’re personally capable of policing, we shun them ruthlessly.
I’m going to answer this bullshit honestly even though the “moralscold” accusation is in bad faith. Brotherhood between men is not possible with a man who wants to be fucked in the ass and lick shit off of a cock. I don’t know exactly why, but it just doesn’t work
I don’t think many today have actually experienced “no women, no homos” male friendship. It’s a night and day difference from gay modern “social circle”. For many men on here, the anonymous internet is the only place they have even a ghost of this
Yes, the death of scifi/fantasy was caused by the fandom “taking ownership” of it. The original writers were all people with interesting lives whose works were all solidly rooted in an actual reality.
The generation after based fantasy on fantasy and none of their works had anything interesting to say or contained anything viscerally compelling. Howard’s Conan stories are good because Howard watched the march of civilization into the closed Texas frontier with his own eyes.
In a very petty way Harry Potter was far better fantasy than technically more well written works because it was actually rooted in an authorial experience that resonated with its audience, even though the “school outsider” is a banal striver anxiety.
Now internet sociology in regard to online dating… tinder became popular just as the FB/IG status jockey turned 18 which is no surprise at all and an extension of the same 100% exposed public social media culture…
…and tinder dried up around 2018 or 2019 as zoomers aged into the dating market, millennial girls “have tinder” now like they “have facebook”. Zoomer dating is almost entirely social circle now and if you see a zoomer girl on tinder or similar…
…she’s either very desperate for variety of reasons (no friends, ugly, fat, etc) or app is used as preliminary screening and she expects you to court her for weeks on snapchat or in DMs on various apps, meet her friends first, various gay things a man has no time for
In the 90s, you needed to have decent computer knowledge to make it onto the internet. The first “social media” was the pseudonymous public forum, a nerd’s libertarian paradise. These usually centered on particular nerdy interests.
They were also almost totally text-focused. Long-form argument ruled, the sperg dominated, and interesting worldviews were shaped in the clash. Jim and Moldbug are products of this culture from its very beginnings. Big divergence between 4chan and Reddit here…
One forum was total anonymity and the deletion of old enough comments and threads. The other was an ur-forum in which one’s reputation followed one through various subforums and threads. As soon as this idea of social proof, a poison in the original well, was introduced…
Let’s fisk these regarded boomer lies. Assume a man in his early-mid 20s who lives with his gf and wants to get married, buy a house, and have kids. He makes a perfectly average income of 60k. The government takes 20% of that and he’s down to 50k take home, or 4000/mo
Let’s assume he can find an apartment for the two of them at median rate. Not the case in many parts of the country but sure. That’s 1200 for a 1br. If you have any real world experience, that’s a shitty little apartment but we’re living like monks to make the dream come true.
The cheapest, shittiest car on the market is the Mitsubishi Mirage for 16k. I looked it up; payments offered to me are 400/mo. Insurance is 250 for me but I drive like a demon with many convictions. Let’s say 600 for all car expenses including gas for efficient shitbox mirage.
My “ancient Israelites were Aryan” theory deserves reiteration on this new account. The Aryans came from “Hyperborea”. In other words, in extremely ancient, Paleolithic times, the R1 haplogroups developed in north central Siberia, and later migrated south.
They ended up settling on the steppe between the Black and Caspian seas, north of the Caucasus mountains, where they practiced semi-nomadic pastoralism and practiced a patriarchal, patrilineal religion involving ancestor worship and the veneration of a supreme Sky Father.
(I refer to all R1a and R1b haplotype males in these cultures as “Aryan” for ease of communication. Minor cultural differences between styles of pottery and burial between the R1-haplotype Proto-Indo-European speaking pastoralists are completely irrelevant to these purposes)