The West is losing the war: current efforts are insufficient to prevent the fall of key Ukrainian regions to Putin in the next 2 years.
1/16 🧵The facts you need to know
(Follow for a second part on good and bad sanctions)
Putin spends about $120bn a year on the war – 5.4% of Russia’s $2.2 trillion GDP – with the most commonly used Russian shell costing about $500
2/16
European aid to Kyiv over two years amounts to $88bn – about 0.25% of the EU’s GDP – with shells that cost between $5,000 and $8,0002
3/16
This means that, if we include the American contribution, Putin is outproducing the West by at least 2.5:1. This year, without US support, that ratio jumps to 4:1
4/16
At the start of the war, Russia’s population was 142 million to Ukraine’s 40 million – a ratio of about 3.5:1. Now, two years later, that ratio is 7:1. And yet, we demand that Ukraine continue to fight on – but with what?
5/16
At the current rate, Kharkiv will fall within the year, and Odesa – next year. By 2026, Ukraine will be capable only of maintaining a small-scale partisan resistance – and that is in the best case scenario
6/16
Lviv will be preserved if Polish troops, as part of NATO, enter the city. This is a more optimistic scenario, provided that the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue their heroic resistance despite all the challenges.
7/16
What is the thought process at play? ‘Perhaps if Putin takes Ukraine, he will calm down’? Perhaps he will – although as I have said before, that is highly unlikely
8/16
More likely, when the war is over, Russian soldiers will be at Poland's border. And they'll be joined by some Ukrainians, resentful of the Western betrayal and, in need of some way to earn a living, forced to join a united Russian-Ukrainian army under Russian command.
9/16
We saw a similar dynamic happen in Donbas.
10/16
I’m sure nobody who has thought about this, really wants to see such an outcome. But as it stands, this is the most likely one. The only way to prevent it is for Western countries to step up their efforts to aid Ukraine and hinder Putin
11/16
Without the support of its allies, Ukraine cannot be expected to fight off the invasion forever. Putin certainly has the support of his own allies. Xi Jinping has said that there are no limits to Sino-Russian co-operation. What can this tell us?
12/16
It tells us that when democracies are not willing to unite and act decisively, then dictators feel empowered to act as they please without fear of consequences
13/16
It’s important to keep in mind that Putin does not need territory. Putin needs a war for his domestic goals. And a weak West makes a wonderful target for him
14/16
If the West hopes to trick the world’s autocrats into a world war, then it’s well on the way to realizing that aim.
15/16
I work to draw attention to the nuances of Russian policy that mainstream outlets often miss. Follow for more analysis
16/16
Thanks to @liberalemoderne for hosting this forum on the current state of affairs between the West and Russia
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's what we know about Putin's new defense minister and what it means for the war in Ukraine.
🧵1/14
A year after Prigozhin's mysterious death, his critiques of Russia's military leadership seem to have resonated with Putin, leading to the replacement of Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. 2/14
Like Shoigu, Andrey Belousov is not a military man. He hasn't even served in the army through conscription, which most Soviet men did. 3/14
Their methods have evolved to include recruiting local criminals and radicals via platforms like Telegram. 2/4
I am adamant that a stark distinction must be made between intelligence operations and sabotage. Intelligence gathering, despite its intrinsic challenges, fundamentally serves to build understanding and informed trust between nations. 3/4
Unsettling reality behind the pomp of Victory Day parade in Moscow:
Among those honored next to Putin were soldiers from units accused of war crimes in Ukraine.
🧵This event, meant to celebrate victory over fascism, now serves to justify Putin’s own fascistic invasion
The parade featured soldiers who fought in Ukraine, some from units accused of war crimes by Ukrainian authorities, identified @agents_media
For instance, troops from the 55th Motor Rifle Brigade, which allegedly held 350 Yahidne villagers captive in a school basement for a month, were among those marching
Imagine facing 10 years in prison because someone complained about you on social media.
This 67 years old pediatrician from Moscow faces a draconian sentence over ‘spreading fake news about the Russian army’
🧵Here's why this is both important and terrifying
Dr Nadezhda Buyanova will be held in a detention center until June 25 after the widow of a Russian soldier posted to a pro-Kremlin Telegram channel that the doctor had allegedly told a child that his father – another soldier killed in the war – was a ‘legitimate target’
What is remarkable about this is the speed with which the regime responded to the post. The day after the complaint on social media, Russia’s chief investigator Bastrykin launched a criminal case, police raided Dr Buyanova’s workplace, and her boss was fired
From the war room to a cell: Putin's deputy defense minister arrested
Insiders say it's a direct threat from Putin to Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.
🧵Here's what we know
In what has been called Russia’s biggest corruption scandal in more than a decade, Ivanov and his friend, businessman Sergey Borodin, are accused of taking a $10,800 bribe to approve a construction firm’s bid for a state contract
Is Ivanov guilty? Most certainly. Last year, @dossier_center found that he had been siphoning money off construction projects in occupied Ukrainian territories. He’s as corrupt as they come dossier.center/ter-ivanov/
The European Parliament's refusal to recognize Putin's presidency is a turning point.
Here’s why it matters 🧵👇
MEPs today voted overwhelmingly to pass a resolution denouncing last month’s sham election and rejecting its falsified results. Of the 522 members, 493 voted in favor of the motion
The resolution points to the lack of competition and the atmosphere of fear and repression created by the regime before the election, as well as the fact polling stations were open in occupied Ukrainian lands