Marjorie Taylor Greene came to Congress specifically to be the antagonistic obstructionist she is. She marched her CrossFit Lego Brick body into the halls of a once venerated institution and has openly harassed and attacked every prominent Democrat. But her fellow 1/
2/ pack of howler monkeys will now screech about decorum because this is America and she, as a white woman, will be cast as the victim, despite being an arsonist running around with gasoline and matches. A Black woman will be cast as the villain for doing what
3/ too many white women find anathema. Standing up for oneself, with receipts, is something that people should have learned over the past decade if not before, is what Black women have had to do because no one else does.
If you've followed Rep. Crockett, you know
4/ that she does regular updates about what was supposed to be the work of the day and what actually was the non-work of the day in Congress. Yes, they're funny as hell. But there's another purpose. One we learn early. We joke about receipts. But we keep them for a reason.
5/ I learned in HS that I needed to be prepared. Someone I thought I trusted (and yes, she was) asked to borrow my notes. Fast forward to both of us being called in by our teacher to ask "who really wrote the paper" (although she knew). Because in those notes, I had
6/ an outline for a paper that we had to do which she followed, verbatim. I sat there silent and angry and she fessed up. The teacher kept me back and told me she had to do what she did. I disagreed because if she knew then she knew but it was HS and I just let it go.
7/ But the lesson I learned and carried forward into college and eventually my career was caution. After contentious meetings, I learned to either write a timestamped desk file or email the other party with a recap of the discussion. Only needed to refernce a few times but
8/ one turned into a "thing" with a WM I laid off when we had to reduce employees. He thought he was slick, going to my boss and her boss. I went that meeting having sent them the emails I'd sent to him in re: the incidents that led to his selection. They already
9/ knew and had to approve the selection and agreed with the assessment. But what stays with me is my 2nd line, a white man, saying "You were right to do this because otherwise we might have had to reverse". That told me he ONLY backed me because of proof, and not
10/ because of my reputation, my manager feedback scores that were always higher than the org and company average, the recognition I'd received that HE had to approve etc. And I know that had I been white, and especially a WM, that part of the discussion wouldn't have happened.
11/11
And how do I know that? Because a WM colleague had to make the same reduction decision I did with a similarly low performing employee and it went off without a hitch.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"But after taking office and examining hundreds of pages of curriculum, Gore was shocked by what she found — and didn’t find." 1/
A GOP Texas school board member campaigned against schools indoctrinating kids. Then she read the curriculum. texastribune.org/2024/05/15/tex…
2/ This lays bare the reality of this "movement". She ran on eradicating things she insisted were there but didn't bother to actually read the real, not projected, curriculum. Why deal in facts when you have "beliefs"?
3/ She was all too willing to swallow lies and projections whole and without doing the work to fact-check or put reality before political gotchas. This entire movement has upended education and is built on a house of cards.
2/ I've heard this projection many, MANY, times. Exactly how do they think this privilege works? It didn't work when we've sold houses and every realtor advised we should take down our pictures. It doesn't work when people assume we aren't a couple. Like at
3/ restaurants where they still ask how the check will be handled, or in stores when one of us walks up to the other in line and gets side-eyed like we're line cutting. It doesn't work when my husband is having a cordial conversation with someone and I walk up and there's
Let's dissect. Paul McCartney not only wrote the song, but has been explicit, for years, about its inspiration and tribute. I'll guarantee you with 99.9% certainty that this person is white. A whitesplainer has come to correct him. Sir. Paul. McCartney. 1/
3/ So you can see that EVEN Sir Paul McCartney is told that what he said isn't what he meant or that what he said inspired him, HIS lived experience witnessing things with his own eyes, is dismissed because someone has decided they don't like it. He has been told
Thoughts on this. Consistent with how way too many white people view racism, it is something that non-white and specifically Black people are expected to endure, not something white people are expected to stop doing. I find that telling. 1/
His message basically boils down to what I and I am very sure many many other Black people have heard forever: "toughen up". The burden is never on those who are engaging in racism to learn, grow, and heaven forfend...STOP. It's on us to become "immune" to it. 2/
I reject the premise and want the baseline assumption changed. We have never had any choice BUT to toughen up. Black children were sent to fields as soon as they could walk. Black children today are adultified and treated as adults when in identical situations, 3/
Because that's what yesterday was. People advocating for a man and his co-defendants...a man who has been found legally liable for sexual assault and who has another trial for covering up his payment to a porn star...can't 1/
fight based on facts or innocence so they turn, easily, to one of the oldest tropes available. The Jezebelization of Fani Willis. What was not at issue yesterday, were any of the facts that led a citizen group of grand jurors to indict them. But in Trumpworld, 2/
women, even if they are supposed to be smart and capable, are to be sexualized. Happened before Trump too. From Palin using her sexuality in place of coherent thoughts, education, or skills, to the edict that the women in the Trump WH look a certain way...an extension 3/