PPE is in the 2nd group- for staff taking care of sick kids. Of course, this ignores the 58% presymptomatic transmission rate for SARS2, 38% for influenza.
Masks for kids are buried in the
"If illness activity is elevated, schools can consider implementing additional strategies"
section. Look at the action words...
Schools CAN CONSIDER implementing additional strategies.
Whoa! Your principal will be RUNNING to implement mask mandates. (Not mentioned).
"These additional strategies depend on several considerations, but include actions such as:"
What considerations? This is just such bad public health writing.
You don't say "there are several things" - and then not actually talk about those things.
Wearing masks are included with increasing space and distance between students and cohorts.
Really? The ONLY time that has been used in the US was during pandemics. (This does not include whole school closure for temporary outbreaks).
So, prima facie, the most effective NPI (NonPharmaceutical Intervention) is only listed in the pandemic section. And not even an effective version, masks, or the fact that mask mandates are necessary for wide uptake.
Especially in schools which are EVEN MORE subject to peer
pressure than adult society. (Mandates work by removing peer pressure).
But hey!
You can applaud the CDC because they actually mentioned the word masks.
✅ Everyone applaud the CDC for dropping the word into a page
You can. Not me.
Let's move on. Maybe it gets better?
Intro page here, but let's look at the quick (the fact) sheet
"Fact Sheet: Help Your Child’s School Prevent the Spread of Infections"
The CDC goes on to recommend possibly adding masking to anti-bullying programs - acknowledging the issue with not having mask mandates. While not mentioning the word.
And a bit later, they point out that immunocompromised children should not be segregated...while ignoring the
fact that not having all in masks? Segregates those in masks.
These CDC guidelines are a touch better than what they had before, but it not only continues to hurt the kids? But the CDC and public health.
/Continued...
Which brings us to maximizing school attendance.
THE NEW CDC GUIDELINES WILL NOT MAXIMIZE ATTENDANCE, and hurt the public's view of the CDC.
That's right - the CDC is hurting public health. Hurting themselves. Hurting the kids. Hurting America.
With this guidance.
/Cont
I will say /fin when done.
Will infectious disease transmission be reduced by the new guidance?
Well, they already had handwashing, cleaning, sanitizing, formally before.
Ventilation was already there before, informally, thanks to Covid.
And infectious disease transmission
has only gone up since the end of public health emergency.
RSV, influenza, etc.
The Zeitgeist has Americans feeling constantly infected. Reddit, Facebook, x/Twitter, etc .
And this new guidance was already in place.
Let's take a simple example, "Jack and Diane".
They see the CDC guidelines. They think, "Yay! The CDC is stepping in to help keep Burt and Ernie from being sick nonstop."
But Burt and Ernie keep getting infected because nothing amhas actually changed since the end of the PHE.
Will Jack and Diane look favorably upon
public health? Or are they more likely to think, "Hey - maybe it IS the vaccines making our kids sick."
Because they already knew their kids school HVAC had been improved.
It is truly ironic that the CDC continues to hurt public health.
While trying to help public health.
If you enjoyed this thread, please give it a retweet.
I almost forgot to close out on the maximize attendance point.
The CDC is "trying" to maximize attendance. This ostensibly is to be done by preventing the spread of the flu, norovirus, strep throat.
Interestingly, covid not mentioned there.
And even more interesting?
All of those are airborne. But as Covid has shown, near field aerosol dominates transmission of airborne diseases.
The CDC is putting fomite and far field aerosol strategies at play.
MASKING is the THE near field aerosol NPI, and is shoved into the back of the closet.
(Note: far field improvements will result in small improvements in near field. Distancing as listed in Alternative strategies is also a near field aerosol NPI)
By ignoring the PRIMARY form of transmission in their HIGHLIGHTED NPIs?
The CDC WILL NOT MAXIMIZE ATTENDANCE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
71 guinea pigs gave their lives between 1956 and 1958 in the eponymous study by Riley et al, getting TB air piped in from some TB patients, to prove TB is airborne.
Influenza is kind of airborne per most doctors. But kind of not.
So....
/1
We need some volunteers.
Will horses be those volunteers that finally lay it all out?
Yes - but none of them lost their lives.
Air samplers were deployed and tracked horses inoculated with Equine influenza virus (EIV).
From the very first day post inoculation (dpi), until the
12th day, EIV was found in the air, in this new study.
With no horses, or guinea pigs, hurt in the process.
But sure, influenza's not airborne - if you are the USDA, right, @nirav_maine?
@ThailandMedicaX, retweeted by some because of their controversial takes (ahem, their lies?), is saying that FAR-UVC is dangerous because somehow the light will get into the lungs.
Lol.
They are just apparent supplement grifters.
🧵
I noticed they were using @NukitToBeSure's excellent torches as their example picture.
Strange to be so selective of an example picture for someone purporting to be an independent news source on health.
Hmm. I helped defend Nukit against charges of
racism by a very nasty couple who it turned out just do not like UVC, personally. I wonder....
Yep, ThailandMedicalX has blocked me.
But, it's weird for a purported news source to block someone like me @gorskon
@doritmi @19joho.
You've heard of "The Three Problem." - great book, and excellent Netflix series.
If you want to be avoid catching Covid, you probably have "The Empty Room" situation in the back of your mind.
How long after a room had people in it, can you safely demask?
Thread.
/1
Measles was thought to be airborne after a child caught measles an hour after the infected child left the same office.
.
Interestingly, you can see the reluctance in blue below to call measles airborne. Much like the WHO with @mvankerkhove researchgate.net/publication/19…
which spent millions to rebrand SARS2 as "through the air" rather than airborne.
It is an inconvenient truth that then leads us to the study showing an #EmptyRoom SARS2 infection at 1 hour and 43 minutes, and FOUR HOURS and FORTY-FIVE MINUTES.
Safer showering and swimming with great breathability!
Others have used a snorkel w/ N95s - but those then collapse around the snorkel, and breathability is more restricted. This new approach is w/ an internal BRACE!
I took a shower with this, and it worked perfectly. Build 🧵
This is a great technique, but I was looking for something with more breathability.