1/ Here is a thread on why recent record sales by the Chinese of US Treasuries might be one of the first signs of a major fiscal crisis in the US. There is a lot of confusion about how this would work so let's go through it step by step.
2/ What matters here is not overall US government debt but rather the balance of payments. If a country runs a trade deficit this must be offset by financial inflows on the financial account to maintain equilibrium.
3/ The United States runs a consistent, large trade deficit. As predicted - because it is a necessity - this trade deficit must be matched with financial inflows. Let's look at what those inflows are.
4/ Here we see that the most important component by a very large amount as 'Debt Securities' that are 'Long Term'. In 2023 $924bn were issued and $103bn bought, meaning net issuance of around $821bn.
5/ These are the key balancing item that allows the US to run its trade deficit. What are they? A lot of them are Treasury bonds.
6/ It used to be that these bonds were bought by China and other governments/central banks. These were stable buyers because it was part of their trade strategy - prop up the US trade deficit to sell more exports. Now increasingly they are bought by private foreign investors.
7/ These investors are buying Treasuries because interest rates are high. Right now they look like an attractive investment. But these investors are 'yield sensitive' and so if interest rates come down they will likely dump the bonds.
8/ This will likely happen in a recession when the Fed lowers rates to counteract the downturn, maybe even more QE. And in a recession tax receipts will fall and unemployment claims will rise - so the US will need to issue even more debt. This will only exarcerbate the problem.
9/ All this is coming on the back of a major Russian-Chinese economic and military alliance that explicitly pushes for a multipolar world order.
10/ Smart strategists on Wall Street understand what is happening, but if you look in the mainstream financial press you will not see any of these stories anywhere.
11/ It appears that those who publish these papers still think 'narrative control' is meaningful. But it no longer is. Only hard economic realities matter now and so the Western press has become like Pravda - a Potemkin Village built for Western leaders to deny reality.
12/ Being blissfully unaware of what is actually happening Western leaders continue to think they control the situation and go around making demands on the Chinese. The Chinese are baffled by this, knowing that they are the United States' creditor.
13/ And so the Chinese just keep offloading US Treasuries, handing them off to yield sensitive investors while recycling the money into gold.
14/ How much could living standards fall? It is hard to tell. Simple modelling suggests that US living standards are around 27% too high relative to their trade deficit.
15/ The people who understand the dynamics at play wait for a recession to kick off to see if lower rates and higher debt issuance will lead to foreign investors dumping Treasuries and forcing the US trade deficit to close - and living standards to fall accordingly.
END/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ With China beefing up its gold reserves and largely opting out of the market for foreign holdings of US Treasuries - which is already causing liquidity problems - it’s useful to get a sense of what the Chinese are saying about this internally. 🧵
2/ Here we turn to the latest issue of the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations’ journal. CICIR is an important government-affiliated think tank that has been around since 1965. So borderline official doctrine coming from this shop.
3/ In the Contents section we see not one, but two articles on the US dollar. ‘The Exorbitant Privilege of US Treasuries and China’s Choice in the New Era’ and ‘Impact of Financial Sanctions on the Dollar’s International Status’.
1/ Now that we have the results let’s take a look at the Shy Trump Effect and how it performed. Remember: when applying the Shy Trump Effect to the polls all we are doing is standard statistical practice. Why can’t @NateSilver538 and @FiveThirtyEight figure it out? 🤷♂️
2/ Some of the swing states haven’t been called but we have some idea of spread. In what follows I will use ‘Trump’s Lead Over Harris’ as the measure. Just as in the original Shy Trump Effect prediction thread.
3/ We start with Arizona.
Polls = +2.6%
Shy Trump Model = +4.9
Result = +4.7%
1/ The US election is here. If you analyze the polls properly you'll see that @realDonaldTrump is ahead of @KamalaHarris by anywhere between 2.4% and 6.9% in the swing states. The reason the media won't tell you this is because they don't understand the Shy Trump Effect. 🇺🇸🧵
2/ The polls show consistent bias against @realDonaldTrump. This is not due to cheating but due to quirks in the polling. More later. For now, let us just look at polls versus outcomes. Here are the November polls in 2020 versus the actual results. They were way off.
3/ Despite these not being the swing states in 2016, we see a similar pattern of polls missing their mark by a long shot in 2016. Again, the polls always showed @realDonaldTrump way behind what his actual results would be.
1/ Despite not becoming Tory leader @RobertJenrick tried to raise serious economic issues in the recent contest. Britain appears locked into 5 year old culture war issues even as its economy looks on the brink of collapse. Britain needs a serious debate on this ASAP. 🧵
2/ @RobertJenrick recognised that one key issue is energy. He advocated switching from green investments into nuclear, specifically small modular reactors (SMR). Britain needs a new energy policy ASAP but it seems highly unlikely the country can develop its own SMRs.
3/ The only country that has successfully built a functional SMR is, you guessed it: China. The Linglong One was brought online at the start of this year.
1/ We have been treated to 48 hours of hot garbage on what happened at the BRICS summit around alternative financing relationships. In this thread we will go through the garbage and look at what actually happened.
2/ Start with the silliest first. Some people were circulating a picture of an actual BRICS banknote, as if the BRICS would adopt a single currency like the euro. This would be like the G7 adopting a single currency. Nonsensical.
3/ The actual source of this was a symbolic gesture between the Russians and the UAE last year. BRICS will never, ever adopt a single currency as that would be utterly ridiculous economically.
1/ What Britain is witnessing is the beginning of Dark Blairism. This is the final stage in the collapse of the country. 🇬🇧🪦🧵
2/ The first iteration of Blairism was a happy-go-lucky affair. Blair and co were Marxists of a variety, but happy Marxists who rejected state socialism and embraced cultural radicalism - a new, freer society where different groups would live in harmony.
3/ But society rejected this vision. People had “biases” - a false consciousness of sorts, mostly amongst the uneducated gammons and chuds. They couldn’t get into Oxbridge to study with Tony, so the state needed to be used to educate them.